甲状腺激素与上皮性卵巢癌的风险和生存:EPIC研究的结果

Azam Majidi,Sabina Rinaldi,Carine Biessy,Beatrice Vozar,Therese Truong,Renée Turzanski Fortner,Charlotte Le Cornet,Matthias B Schulze,Camilla Panico,Rosario Tumino,Giovanna Masala,Fulvio Ricceri,Claudia Vener,Maria-José Sánchez,Raúl Zamora-Ros,Marta Crous-Bou,Sandra M Colorado-Yohar,Marcela Guevara,Pernilla Israelsson,Ruth Travis,Elio Riboli,Agnès Fournier,Laure Dossus
{"title":"甲状腺激素与上皮性卵巢癌的风险和生存:EPIC研究的结果","authors":"Azam Majidi,Sabina Rinaldi,Carine Biessy,Beatrice Vozar,Therese Truong,Renée Turzanski Fortner,Charlotte Le Cornet,Matthias B Schulze,Camilla Panico,Rosario Tumino,Giovanna Masala,Fulvio Ricceri,Claudia Vener,Maria-José Sánchez,Raúl Zamora-Ros,Marta Crous-Bou,Sandra M Colorado-Yohar,Marcela Guevara,Pernilla Israelsson,Ruth Travis,Elio Riboli,Agnès Fournier,Laure Dossus","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroid hormones (free triiodothyronine[fT3] and free thyroxine[fT4]) may influence cancer outcomes, but evidence for ovarian cancer is limited.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a nested case-control study comparing 578 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cases to matched controls within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). To examine associations between circulating TSH, fT3, and fT4 levels and EOC risk, we estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) per standard deviation (SD) using conditional logistic regression. Among cases, we evaluated all-cause and EOC-specific survival by pre-diagnostic hormone levels. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated using multivariable Cox regression. We also estimated covariate-adjusted restricted mean survival time (RMST) and survival probabilities at 5 and 10 years.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThyroid hormones were not associated with EOC risk (RR[95%CI] per SD increase: TSH = 0.99[0.87-1.12]), fT3 = 1.12[0.70-1.79], and fT4 = 1.08[0.56-2.07]) levels. However, higher TSH levels were associated with better survival (HR[95%CI] per SD: all-cause death = 0.90[0.82-0.99], EOC-specific = 0.88[0.79-0.97]), while higher fT4 levels were associated with worse survival (all-cause = 1.10[1.00-1.22], EOC-specific = 1.17[1.05-1.30]), but no association for fT3. RMST and survival probabilities showed similar patterns: for TSH , 10-year RMST and survival increased from 5.3 years and 42.2% in Q1 to 6.4 years and 50.7% in (Quartile[Q]4). Conversely, for fT4, 10-year RMST declined from 5.6 years (Q1) to 5.1 years Q4, and survival from 46.3% to 37.8%.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nTSH and Thyroid hormones might not affect ovarian cancer risk. However, high fT4 and low TSH concentrations may be associated with poorer survival. Further evaluation is suggested in other populations.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thyroid hormones and epithelial ovarian cancer risk and survival: results from the EPIC study.\",\"authors\":\"Azam Majidi,Sabina Rinaldi,Carine Biessy,Beatrice Vozar,Therese Truong,Renée Turzanski Fortner,Charlotte Le Cornet,Matthias B Schulze,Camilla Panico,Rosario Tumino,Giovanna Masala,Fulvio Ricceri,Claudia Vener,Maria-José Sánchez,Raúl Zamora-Ros,Marta Crous-Bou,Sandra M Colorado-Yohar,Marcela Guevara,Pernilla Israelsson,Ruth Travis,Elio Riboli,Agnès Fournier,Laure Dossus\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djaf222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroid hormones (free triiodothyronine[fT3] and free thyroxine[fT4]) may influence cancer outcomes, but evidence for ovarian cancer is limited.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe conducted a nested case-control study comparing 578 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cases to matched controls within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). To examine associations between circulating TSH, fT3, and fT4 levels and EOC risk, we estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) per standard deviation (SD) using conditional logistic regression. Among cases, we evaluated all-cause and EOC-specific survival by pre-diagnostic hormone levels. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated using multivariable Cox regression. We also estimated covariate-adjusted restricted mean survival time (RMST) and survival probabilities at 5 and 10 years.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThyroid hormones were not associated with EOC risk (RR[95%CI] per SD increase: TSH = 0.99[0.87-1.12]), fT3 = 1.12[0.70-1.79], and fT4 = 1.08[0.56-2.07]) levels. However, higher TSH levels were associated with better survival (HR[95%CI] per SD: all-cause death = 0.90[0.82-0.99], EOC-specific = 0.88[0.79-0.97]), while higher fT4 levels were associated with worse survival (all-cause = 1.10[1.00-1.22], EOC-specific = 1.17[1.05-1.30]), but no association for fT3. RMST and survival probabilities showed similar patterns: for TSH , 10-year RMST and survival increased from 5.3 years and 42.2% in Q1 to 6.4 years and 50.7% in (Quartile[Q]4). Conversely, for fT4, 10-year RMST declined from 5.6 years (Q1) to 5.1 years Q4, and survival from 46.3% to 37.8%.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nTSH and Thyroid hormones might not affect ovarian cancer risk. However, high fT4 and low TSH concentrations may be associated with poorer survival. Further evaluation is suggested in other populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

促甲状腺激素(TSH)和甲状腺激素(游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸[fT3]和游离甲状腺素[fT4])可能影响癌症的预后,但卵巢癌的证据有限。方法我们进行了一项巢式病例对照研究,将578例上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)病例与欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC)中的匹配对照进行比较。为了检验循环TSH、fT3和fT4水平与EOC风险之间的关系,我们使用条件逻辑回归估计了每标准差(SD)的风险比(rr)和95%置信区间(CIs)。在这些病例中,我们通过诊断前激素水平评估了全因生存率和eoc特异性生存率。采用多变量Cox回归计算风险比(hr)和95% ci。我们还估计了协变量调整后的限制平均生存时间(RMST)和5年和10年的生存概率。结果甲状腺激素与EOC风险无相关性(每SD升高的RR[95%CI]: TSH = 0.99[0.87-1.12]), fT3 = 1.12[0.70-1.79], fT4 = 1.08[0.56-2.07])。然而,较高的TSH水平与较好的生存率相关(每SD的HR[95%CI]:全因死亡= 0.90[0.82-0.99],eoc特异性= 0.88[0.79-0.97]),而较高的fT4水平与较差的生存率相关(全因= 1.10[1.00-1.22],eoc特异性= 1.17[1.05-1.30]),但与fT3无关。RMST和生存概率表现出类似的模式:对于TSH, 10年RMST和生存从第一季度的5.3年和42.2%增加到第一季度的6.4年和50.7%(四分位数[Q]4)。相反,对于fT4, 10年RMST从第一季度的5.6年下降到第四季度的5.1年,生存率从46.3%下降到37.8%。结论tsh和甲状腺激素对卵巢癌风险无影响。然而,高fT4和低TSH浓度可能与较差的生存率相关。建议对其他人群进行进一步评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thyroid hormones and epithelial ovarian cancer risk and survival: results from the EPIC study.
BACKGROUND Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroid hormones (free triiodothyronine[fT3] and free thyroxine[fT4]) may influence cancer outcomes, but evidence for ovarian cancer is limited. METHODS We conducted a nested case-control study comparing 578 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cases to matched controls within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). To examine associations between circulating TSH, fT3, and fT4 levels and EOC risk, we estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) per standard deviation (SD) using conditional logistic regression. Among cases, we evaluated all-cause and EOC-specific survival by pre-diagnostic hormone levels. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated using multivariable Cox regression. We also estimated covariate-adjusted restricted mean survival time (RMST) and survival probabilities at 5 and 10 years. RESULTS Thyroid hormones were not associated with EOC risk (RR[95%CI] per SD increase: TSH = 0.99[0.87-1.12]), fT3 = 1.12[0.70-1.79], and fT4 = 1.08[0.56-2.07]) levels. However, higher TSH levels were associated with better survival (HR[95%CI] per SD: all-cause death = 0.90[0.82-0.99], EOC-specific = 0.88[0.79-0.97]), while higher fT4 levels were associated with worse survival (all-cause = 1.10[1.00-1.22], EOC-specific = 1.17[1.05-1.30]), but no association for fT3. RMST and survival probabilities showed similar patterns: for TSH , 10-year RMST and survival increased from 5.3 years and 42.2% in Q1 to 6.4 years and 50.7% in (Quartile[Q]4). Conversely, for fT4, 10-year RMST declined from 5.6 years (Q1) to 5.1 years Q4, and survival from 46.3% to 37.8%. CONCLUSION TSH and Thyroid hormones might not affect ovarian cancer risk. However, high fT4 and low TSH concentrations may be associated with poorer survival. Further evaluation is suggested in other populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信