Stephanie Jensen, Camille Simmons, Chiung K Wu, Ansley Ricker, Samuel Ross, Ronald F Sing, Rafael Torres Fajardo
{"title":"钝性脾损伤的非手术治疗:需要常规系列影像学检查吗?十年回顾系列。","authors":"Stephanie Jensen, Camille Simmons, Chiung K Wu, Ansley Ricker, Samuel Ross, Ronald F Sing, Rafael Torres Fajardo","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role for routine follow-up imaging in nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) remains controversial. Delayed complications, specifically vascular abnormalities such as pseudoaneurysms are associated with failure of NOM (FNOM). This study examined a ten-year experience with NOM of BSI and the influence of repeat imaging. Our centers have no guidelines for follow-up imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all trauma patients with BSI admitted within a regional trauma system (two Level III and one Level I ACS-verified trauma centers) between 2013 and 2022. Patient demographics, injury features, imaging and outcomes were obtained from trauma registry data and chart review. Patients undergoing splenectomy 6 hours or more after presentation were categorized as FNOM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1815 patients presented with BSI during the study period. Urgent splenectomy was performed in 15.6 % (N=283). The rate of FNOM was 3.4 % (N=62). Among the 1532 patients initially managed nonoperatively, 139 (9.1 %) underwent a follow-up CT scan. Most scans were obtained in response to clinical changes, while 13.7 % (N= 19) were obtained for splenic surveillance. Follow-up scans were followed by 8 splenectomies and 9 embolizations. Among the 19 scans performed for surveillance, two revealed a pseudoaneurysm; one of which underwent embolization. Results are limited by a low rate of screening imaging and a lack of long-term outcome information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low rate of FNOM was achieved despite less than 2 % (19/1532) of patients undergoing screening follow-up imaging. These findings suggest that there is limited opportunity for routine surveillance imaging to improve outcomes in BSI. Reimaging in response to clinical changes is a cost-effective alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"112627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: Need for routine serial imaging? A ten-year retrospective series.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Jensen, Camille Simmons, Chiung K Wu, Ansley Ricker, Samuel Ross, Ronald F Sing, Rafael Torres Fajardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role for routine follow-up imaging in nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) remains controversial. Delayed complications, specifically vascular abnormalities such as pseudoaneurysms are associated with failure of NOM (FNOM). This study examined a ten-year experience with NOM of BSI and the influence of repeat imaging. Our centers have no guidelines for follow-up imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all trauma patients with BSI admitted within a regional trauma system (two Level III and one Level I ACS-verified trauma centers) between 2013 and 2022. Patient demographics, injury features, imaging and outcomes were obtained from trauma registry data and chart review. Patients undergoing splenectomy 6 hours or more after presentation were categorized as FNOM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1815 patients presented with BSI during the study period. Urgent splenectomy was performed in 15.6 % (N=283). The rate of FNOM was 3.4 % (N=62). Among the 1532 patients initially managed nonoperatively, 139 (9.1 %) underwent a follow-up CT scan. Most scans were obtained in response to clinical changes, while 13.7 % (N= 19) were obtained for splenic surveillance. Follow-up scans were followed by 8 splenectomies and 9 embolizations. Among the 19 scans performed for surveillance, two revealed a pseudoaneurysm; one of which underwent embolization. Results are limited by a low rate of screening imaging and a lack of long-term outcome information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low rate of FNOM was achieved despite less than 2 % (19/1532) of patients undergoing screening follow-up imaging. These findings suggest that there is limited opportunity for routine surveillance imaging to improve outcomes in BSI. Reimaging in response to clinical changes is a cost-effective alternative.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"112627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: Need for routine serial imaging? A ten-year retrospective series.
Background: The role for routine follow-up imaging in nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) remains controversial. Delayed complications, specifically vascular abnormalities such as pseudoaneurysms are associated with failure of NOM (FNOM). This study examined a ten-year experience with NOM of BSI and the influence of repeat imaging. Our centers have no guidelines for follow-up imaging.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all trauma patients with BSI admitted within a regional trauma system (two Level III and one Level I ACS-verified trauma centers) between 2013 and 2022. Patient demographics, injury features, imaging and outcomes were obtained from trauma registry data and chart review. Patients undergoing splenectomy 6 hours or more after presentation were categorized as FNOM.
Results: A total of 1815 patients presented with BSI during the study period. Urgent splenectomy was performed in 15.6 % (N=283). The rate of FNOM was 3.4 % (N=62). Among the 1532 patients initially managed nonoperatively, 139 (9.1 %) underwent a follow-up CT scan. Most scans were obtained in response to clinical changes, while 13.7 % (N= 19) were obtained for splenic surveillance. Follow-up scans were followed by 8 splenectomies and 9 embolizations. Among the 19 scans performed for surveillance, two revealed a pseudoaneurysm; one of which underwent embolization. Results are limited by a low rate of screening imaging and a lack of long-term outcome information.
Conclusion: A low rate of FNOM was achieved despite less than 2 % (19/1532) of patients undergoing screening follow-up imaging. These findings suggest that there is limited opportunity for routine surveillance imaging to improve outcomes in BSI. Reimaging in response to clinical changes is a cost-effective alternative.