与右侧左心房切开术相比,上间隔入路是否会增加术后连接节律的发生率?右小开胸微创二尖瓣手术的比较。

IF 1.3
Masataka Yamazaki, Yorihiko Matsumoto, Tatsuo Takahashi, Hirofumi Haida, Naritaka Kimura, Kenichi Hashizume, Hideyuki Shimizu
{"title":"与右侧左心房切开术相比,上间隔入路是否会增加术后连接节律的发生率?右小开胸微创二尖瓣手术的比较。","authors":"Masataka Yamazaki, Yorihiko Matsumoto, Tatsuo Takahashi, Hirofumi Haida, Naritaka Kimura, Kenichi Hashizume, Hideyuki Shimizu","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The superior septal approach offers improved mitral valve exposure compared to the right-sided left atriotomy or transseptal approach. However, the risk of postoperative sinus node dysfunction remains controversial, with limited data in the context of right mini-thoracotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 155 patients (64 women; mean age, 60.8 ± 13.4 years) who underwent mitral valve surgery via right mini-thoracotomy between November 2016 and August 2023. Indications included degenerative mitral regurgitation (94.8%) and mitral stenosis (5.2%). Patients were divided into 2 groups: the conventional minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (CM) group (n = 47), using the right-sided left atriotomy, and the drawer-case technique (DCT) group (n = 108), using the superior septal approach. Demographic, intraoperative, and outcome data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in valve repair techniques or postoperative echocardiographic findings. Postoperative junctional rhythm occurred in 6 patients (CM group) and 21 patients (DCT group); all patients with preoperative sinus rhythm returned to sinus rhythm postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The superior septal approach does not increase the risk of persistent junctional rhythm in right mini-thoracotomy and is a safe and effective option for mitral valve surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Superior Septal Approach Increase the Incidence of Postoperative Junctional Rhythm Compared to the Right-Sided Left Atriotomy?: A Comparison in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery via Right Mini-Thoracotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Masataka Yamazaki, Yorihiko Matsumoto, Tatsuo Takahashi, Hirofumi Haida, Naritaka Kimura, Kenichi Hashizume, Hideyuki Shimizu\",\"doi\":\"10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The superior septal approach offers improved mitral valve exposure compared to the right-sided left atriotomy or transseptal approach. However, the risk of postoperative sinus node dysfunction remains controversial, with limited data in the context of right mini-thoracotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 155 patients (64 women; mean age, 60.8 ± 13.4 years) who underwent mitral valve surgery via right mini-thoracotomy between November 2016 and August 2023. Indications included degenerative mitral regurgitation (94.8%) and mitral stenosis (5.2%). Patients were divided into 2 groups: the conventional minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (CM) group (n = 47), using the right-sided left atriotomy, and the drawer-case technique (DCT) group (n = 108), using the superior septal approach. Demographic, intraoperative, and outcome data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in valve repair techniques or postoperative echocardiographic findings. Postoperative junctional rhythm occurred in 6 patients (CM group) and 21 patients (DCT group); all patients with preoperative sinus rhythm returned to sinus rhythm postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The superior septal approach does not increase the risk of persistent junctional rhythm in right mini-thoracotomy and is a safe and effective option for mitral valve surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与右侧左心房切开或经间隔入路相比,上间隔入路可改善二尖瓣暴露。然而,术后窦结功能障碍的风险仍然存在争议,在右侧小开胸手术的背景下,数据有限。方法:本回顾性研究纳入155例患者(女性64例;平均年龄60.8±13.4岁),于2016年11月至2023年8月期间接受了右小开胸二尖瓣手术。适应症包括退行性二尖瓣返流(94.8%)和二尖瓣狭窄(5.2%)。将患者分为两组:常规微创二尖瓣手术(CM)组(n = 47),采用右侧左心房切开术;抽屉盒技术(DCT)组(n = 108),采用上间隔入路。对人口学、术中和结局数据进行分析。结果:两组间基线特征相似。两组在瓣膜修复技术和术后超声心动图表现上无显著差异。CM组6例,DCT组21例;术前有窦性心律的患者术后均恢复窦性心律。结论:上间隔入路不会增加右小开胸术持续结节律的风险,是二尖瓣手术安全有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Superior Septal Approach Increase the Incidence of Postoperative Junctional Rhythm Compared to the Right-Sided Left Atriotomy?: A Comparison in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery via Right Mini-Thoracotomy.

Purpose: The superior septal approach offers improved mitral valve exposure compared to the right-sided left atriotomy or transseptal approach. However, the risk of postoperative sinus node dysfunction remains controversial, with limited data in the context of right mini-thoracotomy.

Methods: This retrospective study included 155 patients (64 women; mean age, 60.8 ± 13.4 years) who underwent mitral valve surgery via right mini-thoracotomy between November 2016 and August 2023. Indications included degenerative mitral regurgitation (94.8%) and mitral stenosis (5.2%). Patients were divided into 2 groups: the conventional minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (CM) group (n = 47), using the right-sided left atriotomy, and the drawer-case technique (DCT) group (n = 108), using the superior septal approach. Demographic, intraoperative, and outcome data were analyzed.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in valve repair techniques or postoperative echocardiographic findings. Postoperative junctional rhythm occurred in 6 patients (CM group) and 21 patients (DCT group); all patients with preoperative sinus rhythm returned to sinus rhythm postoperatively.

Conclusion: The superior septal approach does not increase the risk of persistent junctional rhythm in right mini-thoracotomy and is a safe and effective option for mitral valve surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信