HeeEun Kang, Asif N Khan, Justin J Kim, Isabella W Martin, Richard A Zuckerman
{"title":"非-内酰胺类药物用于氨苄西林敏感肠球菌菌血症的决定性治疗:单中心经验。","authors":"HeeEun Kang, Asif N Khan, Justin J Kim, Isabella W Martin, Richard A Zuckerman","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.10078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the use of non-beta-lactam agents (NBL) to treat ampicillin-susceptible <i>Enterococcus</i> bacteremia (ASEB), and to identify factors associated with their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study at a rural tertiary referral center was conducted to identify ASEB episodes between January 1, 2016, and 31 December, 2021. Patient, microbiological, infection, clinical management characteristics, and outcomes were compared between those who received NBL versus BL agents for definitive therapy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with NBL use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>158 episodes of ASEB in 153 patients were included. 43 episodes (27%) were treated with NBL for definitive therapy. Factors associated with NBL therapy were younger age, history of penicillin allergy, history of cancer, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), polymicrobial bacteremia, lack of metastatic foci, and lack of endocarditis. Combination therapy was used in 23% of those treated with BL therapy versus zero patients receiving NBL therapy. All-cause 30-day and 90-day mortality and 30-day relapse rate were not statistically different. In the regression model, NBL therapy was more likely in those with: younger age (AOR 0.95, <i>p</i> < .01), any penicillin allergy (AOR 5.87, <i>p</i> < .01), history of cancer (AOR 5.25, <i>p</i> < .01), ESRD (AOR 12.48, <i>p</i> < .001), and polymicrobial bacteremia (AOR 4.20, <i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NBL was used as definitive treatment in 27% of ASEB with good clinical outcomes. This real-life experience suggests NBL can be successfully used to treat ASEB based on clinical discretion.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-beta-lactam agents for definitive treatment of ampicillin-susceptible <i>Enterococcus</i> bacteremia: a single-center experience.\",\"authors\":\"HeeEun Kang, Asif N Khan, Justin J Kim, Isabella W Martin, Richard A Zuckerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2025.10078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the use of non-beta-lactam agents (NBL) to treat ampicillin-susceptible <i>Enterococcus</i> bacteremia (ASEB), and to identify factors associated with their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study at a rural tertiary referral center was conducted to identify ASEB episodes between January 1, 2016, and 31 December, 2021. Patient, microbiological, infection, clinical management characteristics, and outcomes were compared between those who received NBL versus BL agents for definitive therapy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with NBL use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>158 episodes of ASEB in 153 patients were included. 43 episodes (27%) were treated with NBL for definitive therapy. Factors associated with NBL therapy were younger age, history of penicillin allergy, history of cancer, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), polymicrobial bacteremia, lack of metastatic foci, and lack of endocarditis. Combination therapy was used in 23% of those treated with BL therapy versus zero patients receiving NBL therapy. All-cause 30-day and 90-day mortality and 30-day relapse rate were not statistically different. In the regression model, NBL therapy was more likely in those with: younger age (AOR 0.95, <i>p</i> < .01), any penicillin allergy (AOR 5.87, <i>p</i> < .01), history of cancer (AOR 5.25, <i>p</i> < .01), ESRD (AOR 12.48, <i>p</i> < .001), and polymicrobial bacteremia (AOR 4.20, <i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NBL was used as definitive treatment in 27% of ASEB with good clinical outcomes. This real-life experience suggests NBL can be successfully used to treat ASEB based on clinical discretion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"e182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:描述非β -内酰胺类药物(NBL)治疗氨苄西林敏感肠球菌血症(ASEB)的使用情况,并确定其使用的相关因素。方法:在农村三级转诊中心进行单中心回顾性研究,以确定2016年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间的ASEB发作。患者、微生物学、感染、临床管理特征和结果在接受NBL和BL药物作为最终治疗的患者之间进行比较。采用多变量logistic回归分析确定与NBL使用相关的因素。结果:153例患者出现158次ASEB。43例(27%)用NBL作为最终治疗。与NBL治疗相关的因素有:年龄较小、青霉素过敏史、癌症史、终末期肾病(ESRD)、多微生物菌血症、无转移灶、无心内膜炎。接受BL治疗的患者中有23%使用联合治疗,而接受NBL治疗的患者为零。全因30天、90天死亡率和30天复发率无统计学差异。在回归模型中,年龄较小(AOR 0.95, p < 0.01)、任何青霉素过敏(AOR 5.87, p < 0.01)、癌症史(AOR 5.25, p < 0.01)、ESRD (AOR 12.48, p < 0.001)和多微生物菌血症(AOR 4.20, p < 0.01)的患者更可能接受NBL治疗。结论:27%的ASEB患者将NBL作为最终治疗方法,临床效果良好。这一现实经验表明,基于临床判断,NBL可以成功地用于治疗ASEB。
Non-beta-lactam agents for definitive treatment of ampicillin-susceptible Enterococcus bacteremia: a single-center experience.
Objective: To describe the use of non-beta-lactam agents (NBL) to treat ampicillin-susceptible Enterococcus bacteremia (ASEB), and to identify factors associated with their use.
Methods: A single-center retrospective study at a rural tertiary referral center was conducted to identify ASEB episodes between January 1, 2016, and 31 December, 2021. Patient, microbiological, infection, clinical management characteristics, and outcomes were compared between those who received NBL versus BL agents for definitive therapy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with NBL use.
Results: 158 episodes of ASEB in 153 patients were included. 43 episodes (27%) were treated with NBL for definitive therapy. Factors associated with NBL therapy were younger age, history of penicillin allergy, history of cancer, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), polymicrobial bacteremia, lack of metastatic foci, and lack of endocarditis. Combination therapy was used in 23% of those treated with BL therapy versus zero patients receiving NBL therapy. All-cause 30-day and 90-day mortality and 30-day relapse rate were not statistically different. In the regression model, NBL therapy was more likely in those with: younger age (AOR 0.95, p < .01), any penicillin allergy (AOR 5.87, p < .01), history of cancer (AOR 5.25, p < .01), ESRD (AOR 12.48, p < .001), and polymicrobial bacteremia (AOR 4.20, p < .01).
Conclusion: NBL was used as definitive treatment in 27% of ASEB with good clinical outcomes. This real-life experience suggests NBL can be successfully used to treat ASEB based on clinical discretion.