J. Retzmann , A. Grimm , E. Frieauff , D. Schröder , S. Dartsch , S. Kampmeier , C. Härtel , C. Silwedel
{"title":"中心静脉导管在极低出生体重儿:来自全国调查的结果。","authors":"J. Retzmann , A. Grimm , E. Frieauff , D. Schröder , S. Dartsch , S. Kampmeier , C. Härtel , C. Silwedel","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.07.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in preterm infants. They ensure secure vascular access but are also linked to relevant complications such as catheter-associated infections. Data on CVC practice in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are scarce, and management has rarely been comprehensively evaluated to date.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate daily practice of CVC usage in German tertiary level NICUs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a web-based survey, all 163 tertiary level NICUs in Germany were asked to provide information on local CVC practices, including indications, catheter types, and infection prevention measures.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Anonymized data from <em>N</em> = 88 NICUs were analysed (response rate: 54%). Difficult venous access (85%) as well as administration of inotropes (90%) or parenteral nutrition (84%) were named as the most common reasons for CVC insertion. Peripherally inserted central catheters were the preferred catheter type (90–91% in weeks 1–2). Bloodstream infections were identified as the most frequent catheter-associated complication (65%). Key infection prevention measures highlighted by participants included strict hygiene upon catheter insertion (93%) and handling (83%) as well as early catheter removal (90%). However, practices varied significantly across units, particularly regarding skin antisepsis, routine dressing and catheter changes, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and device stewardship.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This survey provides a comprehensive overview of CVC use in German NICUs. It reveals significant variations in practices, reflecting both adherence to and deviations from national recommendations, thereby emphasizing areas of strength as well as opportunities for improvements, such as benchmarking for device stewardship.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"165 ","pages":"Pages 73-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central venous catheters in very low birthweight infants: results from a national survey\",\"authors\":\"J. Retzmann , A. Grimm , E. Frieauff , D. Schröder , S. Dartsch , S. Kampmeier , C. Härtel , C. Silwedel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.07.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in preterm infants. They ensure secure vascular access but are also linked to relevant complications such as catheter-associated infections. Data on CVC practice in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are scarce, and management has rarely been comprehensively evaluated to date.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate daily practice of CVC usage in German tertiary level NICUs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a web-based survey, all 163 tertiary level NICUs in Germany were asked to provide information on local CVC practices, including indications, catheter types, and infection prevention measures.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Anonymized data from <em>N</em> = 88 NICUs were analysed (response rate: 54%). Difficult venous access (85%) as well as administration of inotropes (90%) or parenteral nutrition (84%) were named as the most common reasons for CVC insertion. Peripherally inserted central catheters were the preferred catheter type (90–91% in weeks 1–2). Bloodstream infections were identified as the most frequent catheter-associated complication (65%). Key infection prevention measures highlighted by participants included strict hygiene upon catheter insertion (93%) and handling (83%) as well as early catheter removal (90%). However, practices varied significantly across units, particularly regarding skin antisepsis, routine dressing and catheter changes, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and device stewardship.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This survey provides a comprehensive overview of CVC use in German NICUs. It reveals significant variations in practices, reflecting both adherence to and deviations from national recommendations, thereby emphasizing areas of strength as well as opportunities for improvements, such as benchmarking for device stewardship.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 73-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670125002439\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670125002439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Central venous catheters in very low birthweight infants: results from a national survey
Background
Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in preterm infants. They ensure secure vascular access but are also linked to relevant complications such as catheter-associated infections. Data on CVC practice in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are scarce, and management has rarely been comprehensively evaluated to date.
Aim
To evaluate daily practice of CVC usage in German tertiary level NICUs.
Methods
Using a web-based survey, all 163 tertiary level NICUs in Germany were asked to provide information on local CVC practices, including indications, catheter types, and infection prevention measures.
Findings
Anonymized data from N = 88 NICUs were analysed (response rate: 54%). Difficult venous access (85%) as well as administration of inotropes (90%) or parenteral nutrition (84%) were named as the most common reasons for CVC insertion. Peripherally inserted central catheters were the preferred catheter type (90–91% in weeks 1–2). Bloodstream infections were identified as the most frequent catheter-associated complication (65%). Key infection prevention measures highlighted by participants included strict hygiene upon catheter insertion (93%) and handling (83%) as well as early catheter removal (90%). However, practices varied significantly across units, particularly regarding skin antisepsis, routine dressing and catheter changes, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and device stewardship.
Conclusion
This survey provides a comprehensive overview of CVC use in German NICUs. It reveals significant variations in practices, reflecting both adherence to and deviations from national recommendations, thereby emphasizing areas of strength as well as opportunities for improvements, such as benchmarking for device stewardship.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.