前额叶皮层的神经调节促进语言理解过程中的深度加工:一项tDCS/EEG研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Megan A Boudewyn, Cameron S Carter
{"title":"前额叶皮层的神经调节促进语言理解过程中的深度加工:一项tDCS/EEG研究。","authors":"Megan A Boudewyn, Cameron S Carter","doi":"10.3758/s13415-025-01337-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive neuromodulation technique, to test a set of hypotheses about the extent to which the prefrontal cortex (PFC) contributes to revision and updating processes during language comprehension. Following 20 min of PFC-targeted, Active Control, or Sham tDCS, EEG was recorded while participants performed a widely used paradigm in which they read sentences containing plausible and implausible thematic roles (e.g. The actress/film-maker was directed by the film-maker/actress on set). This linguistic manipulation allowed us to examine comprehension under conditions when shallow processing and deeper processing yield conflicting meaning representations, which previous work has shown often engages revision and updating processes upon detection of the conflict. A different pattern of event-related potential responses was elicited when the same participants encountered implausible thematic roles during reading after receiving Sham compared with PFC-targeted tDCS. Specifically, N400 effects were found after Sham tDCS, whereas robust P600 effects were found after PFC-targeted tDCS (and to a significantly lesser extent, after Active Control tDCS). This suggests that while readers tended to treat implausible thematic roles as semantic anomalies after Sham tDCS, those same readers were more likely to detect conflict and engage in revision and updating in response to implausible thematic roles when in a state of heightened PFC stimulation. These results provide a novel demonstration of within-individual variability in language processing depending on current neurocognitive state and have implications for psycholinguistic theory about PFC contributions to revision and updating processes during language comprehension.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1436-1448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromodulation of prefrontal cortex promotes deep processing during language comprehension: a tDCS/EEG study.\",\"authors\":\"Megan A Boudewyn, Cameron S Carter\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13415-025-01337-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive neuromodulation technique, to test a set of hypotheses about the extent to which the prefrontal cortex (PFC) contributes to revision and updating processes during language comprehension. Following 20 min of PFC-targeted, Active Control, or Sham tDCS, EEG was recorded while participants performed a widely used paradigm in which they read sentences containing plausible and implausible thematic roles (e.g. The actress/film-maker was directed by the film-maker/actress on set). This linguistic manipulation allowed us to examine comprehension under conditions when shallow processing and deeper processing yield conflicting meaning representations, which previous work has shown often engages revision and updating processes upon detection of the conflict. A different pattern of event-related potential responses was elicited when the same participants encountered implausible thematic roles during reading after receiving Sham compared with PFC-targeted tDCS. Specifically, N400 effects were found after Sham tDCS, whereas robust P600 effects were found after PFC-targeted tDCS (and to a significantly lesser extent, after Active Control tDCS). This suggests that while readers tended to treat implausible thematic roles as semantic anomalies after Sham tDCS, those same readers were more likely to detect conflict and engage in revision and updating in response to implausible thematic roles when in a state of heightened PFC stimulation. These results provide a novel demonstration of within-individual variability in language processing depending on current neurocognitive state and have implications for psycholinguistic theory about PFC contributions to revision and updating processes during language comprehension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1436-1448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464150/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01337-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01337-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们使用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS),一种无创神经调节技术,来测试一系列关于前额叶皮层(PFC)在语言理解过程中对修正和更新过程的贡献程度的假设。在以pfc为目标、主动控制或假tDCS的20分钟后,当参与者执行一种广泛使用的范式时,EEG被记录下来,在这种范式中,他们阅读包含可信和不可信主题角色的句子(例如,女演员/电影制片人是由电影制片人/女演员在片场指导的)。这种语言操作使我们能够在浅层处理和深层处理产生冲突的意义表征的情况下检查理解,之前的工作表明,在发现冲突时,通常需要进行修订和更新过程。与pfc靶向tDCS相比,当相同的参与者在接受Sham后阅读时遇到不可信的主题角色时,引发了不同的事件相关潜在反应模式。具体来说,假性tDCS后发现了N400效应,而pfc靶向tDCS后发现了强大的P600效应(在积极控制tDCS后发现的程度要小得多)。这表明,虽然在假性tDCS后,读者倾向于将不可信的主题角色视为语义异常,但在PFC刺激增强的状态下,这些读者更有可能发现冲突,并对不可信的主题角色做出修改和更新。这些结果为语言加工的个体变异提供了一个新的证明,这取决于当前的神经认知状态,并对语言理解过程中PFC对修正和更新过程的贡献的心理语言学理论具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuromodulation of prefrontal cortex promotes deep processing during language comprehension: a tDCS/EEG study.

In this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive neuromodulation technique, to test a set of hypotheses about the extent to which the prefrontal cortex (PFC) contributes to revision and updating processes during language comprehension. Following 20 min of PFC-targeted, Active Control, or Sham tDCS, EEG was recorded while participants performed a widely used paradigm in which they read sentences containing plausible and implausible thematic roles (e.g. The actress/film-maker was directed by the film-maker/actress on set). This linguistic manipulation allowed us to examine comprehension under conditions when shallow processing and deeper processing yield conflicting meaning representations, which previous work has shown often engages revision and updating processes upon detection of the conflict. A different pattern of event-related potential responses was elicited when the same participants encountered implausible thematic roles during reading after receiving Sham compared with PFC-targeted tDCS. Specifically, N400 effects were found after Sham tDCS, whereas robust P600 effects were found after PFC-targeted tDCS (and to a significantly lesser extent, after Active Control tDCS). This suggests that while readers tended to treat implausible thematic roles as semantic anomalies after Sham tDCS, those same readers were more likely to detect conflict and engage in revision and updating in response to implausible thematic roles when in a state of heightened PFC stimulation. These results provide a novel demonstration of within-individual variability in language processing depending on current neurocognitive state and have implications for psycholinguistic theory about PFC contributions to revision and updating processes during language comprehension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信