肠系膜淋巴管造影作为难治性乳糜淋巴渗漏和蛋白质丢失性肠病的新诊断和治疗工具。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
David Yurui Lim, Saebeom Hur, Lyo Min Kwon, Maxim Itkin
{"title":"肠系膜淋巴管造影作为难治性乳糜淋巴渗漏和蛋白质丢失性肠病的新诊断和治疗工具。","authors":"David Yurui Lim, Saebeom Hur, Lyo Min Kwon, Maxim Itkin","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether mesenteric lymphangiography (mLAG) is technically feasible and clinically useful for patients with refractory chylous ascites, chylothorax, and protein-losing enteropathy (PLE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 35 patients (male, 16; female, 19; mean age, 56 years; range, 20-78 years) who underwent mLAG at 2 institutions between March 2016 and July 2022 was performed. mLAG was performed via intraoperative and/or percutaneous approaches. Imaging findings were categorized into 3 types: Type 0 (technical failure), Type 1 (limited to mesentery), or Type 2 (central propagation). Auxiliary findings including lymphangiectasia, reflux, and leakage were recorded. Interventions included mesenteric lymph node embolization (mLNE), retroperitoneal lymph node embolization, lymphoplasty, and lymphovenous shunt creation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 35 patients, 27 presented with refractory chylous ascites and/or chylothorax and 8 with PLE. Of the 35 patients, mLAG was performed percutaneously in 21 (60%) patients, intraoperatively in 9 (26%), and both percutaneously and intraoperatively in 5 (14%) patients. The findings were classified as Type 0 in 4 (11%), Type 1 in 8 (23%), and Type 2 in 23 (66%). Of 35 patients, the auxiliary findings of lymphangiectasia (E), reflux (R), and leakage (L) were observed in 20% (n = 7), 23% (n = 8), and 6% (n = 2), respectively. mLNE was performed in 14 patients. Clinical improvement was achieved in 57% (20 of 35) of the patients. One patient developed bowel wall edema post-mLNE; no other severe adverse event was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mLAG is technically feasible and safe. It can be a useful tool to image the mesenteric lymphatics or perform mesenteric lymphatic embolization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mesenteric Lymphangiography as a New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Tool for Refractory Chylous Lymphatic Leakages and Protein-Losing Enteropathy.\",\"authors\":\"David Yurui Lim, Saebeom Hur, Lyo Min Kwon, Maxim Itkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvir.2025.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether mesenteric lymphangiography (mLAG) is technically feasible and clinically useful for patients with refractory chylous ascites, chylothorax, and protein-losing enteropathy (PLE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 35 patients (male, 16; female, 19; mean age, 56 years; range, 20-78 years) who underwent mLAG at 2 institutions between March 2016 and July 2022 was performed. mLAG was performed via intraoperative and/or percutaneous approaches. Imaging findings were categorized into 3 types: Type 0 (technical failure), Type 1 (limited to mesentery), or Type 2 (central propagation). Auxiliary findings including lymphangiectasia, reflux, and leakage were recorded. Interventions included mesenteric lymph node embolization (mLNE), retroperitoneal lymph node embolization, lymphoplasty, and lymphovenous shunt creation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 35 patients, 27 presented with refractory chylous ascites and/or chylothorax and 8 with PLE. Of the 35 patients, mLAG was performed percutaneously in 21 (60%) patients, intraoperatively in 9 (26%), and both percutaneously and intraoperatively in 5 (14%) patients. The findings were classified as Type 0 in 4 (11%), Type 1 in 8 (23%), and Type 2 in 23 (66%). Of 35 patients, the auxiliary findings of lymphangiectasia (E), reflux (R), and leakage (L) were observed in 20% (n = 7), 23% (n = 8), and 6% (n = 2), respectively. mLNE was performed in 14 patients. Clinical improvement was achieved in 57% (20 of 35) of the patients. One patient developed bowel wall edema post-mLNE; no other severe adverse event was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>mLAG is technically feasible and safe. It can be a useful tool to image the mesenteric lymphatics or perform mesenteric lymphatic embolization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2025.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2025.08.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估肠系膜淋巴管造影(mLAG)在难治性乳糜腹水、乳糜胸和蛋白丢失性肠病患者中的技术可行性和临床应用价值。材料和方法:回顾性研究了2016年3月至2022年7月期间在两家机构接受mLAG治疗的35例患者(M/F 16:19,平均年龄56岁,范围20-78岁)。mLAG通过术中和/或经皮入路进行。影像学表现分为三种类型:0型(技术故障),1型(仅限于肠系膜)或2型(中央传播)。辅助发现包括淋巴管扩张、反流和渗漏。干预措施包括肠系膜淋巴结栓塞(mLNE)、腹膜后淋巴结栓塞、淋巴成形术和淋巴静脉分流术。结果:35例患者中,27例出现难治性乳糜腹水和/或乳糜胸,8例出现PLE。21/35(60%)患者经皮行mLAG, 9/35(26%)患者术中行mLAG, 5/35(14%)患者同时经皮和术中行mLAG。研究结果分为4例(11%)、8例(23%)和23例(66%)。辅助表现为淋巴管扩张(E)、反流(R)、渗漏(L)的分别占20% (n=7/35)、23% (n=8/35)、6% (n=2/35)。14例患者行肠系膜淋巴结栓塞术(mLNE)。57%(20/35)的患者获得临床改善。一例mlne术后出现肠壁水肿;没有其他主要不良事件的报道。结论:肠系膜淋巴管造影技术可行,安全可靠。它可以作为肠系膜淋巴显像或肠系膜淋巴栓塞术的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mesenteric Lymphangiography as a New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Tool for Refractory Chylous Lymphatic Leakages and Protein-Losing Enteropathy.

Purpose: To evaluate whether mesenteric lymphangiography (mLAG) is technically feasible and clinically useful for patients with refractory chylous ascites, chylothorax, and protein-losing enteropathy (PLE).

Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 35 patients (male, 16; female, 19; mean age, 56 years; range, 20-78 years) who underwent mLAG at 2 institutions between March 2016 and July 2022 was performed. mLAG was performed via intraoperative and/or percutaneous approaches. Imaging findings were categorized into 3 types: Type 0 (technical failure), Type 1 (limited to mesentery), or Type 2 (central propagation). Auxiliary findings including lymphangiectasia, reflux, and leakage were recorded. Interventions included mesenteric lymph node embolization (mLNE), retroperitoneal lymph node embolization, lymphoplasty, and lymphovenous shunt creation.

Results: Among 35 patients, 27 presented with refractory chylous ascites and/or chylothorax and 8 with PLE. Of the 35 patients, mLAG was performed percutaneously in 21 (60%) patients, intraoperatively in 9 (26%), and both percutaneously and intraoperatively in 5 (14%) patients. The findings were classified as Type 0 in 4 (11%), Type 1 in 8 (23%), and Type 2 in 23 (66%). Of 35 patients, the auxiliary findings of lymphangiectasia (E), reflux (R), and leakage (L) were observed in 20% (n = 7), 23% (n = 8), and 6% (n = 2), respectively. mLNE was performed in 14 patients. Clinical improvement was achieved in 57% (20 of 35) of the patients. One patient developed bowel wall edema post-mLNE; no other severe adverse event was reported.

Conclusions: mLAG is technically feasible and safe. It can be a useful tool to image the mesenteric lymphatics or perform mesenteric lymphatic embolization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
942
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信