医师引导的胸腺上皮肿瘤体积评估深度学习模型。

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-13 DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.12.4.046501
Nirmal Choradia, Nathan Lay, Alex Chen, James Latanski, Meredith McAdams, Shannon Swift, Christine Feierabend, Testi Sherif, Susan Sansone, Laercio DaSilva, James L Gulley, Arlene Sirajuddin, Stephanie Harmon, Arun Rajan, Baris Turkbey, Chen Zhao
{"title":"医师引导的胸腺上皮肿瘤体积评估深度学习模型。","authors":"Nirmal Choradia, Nathan Lay, Alex Chen, James Latanski, Meredith McAdams, Shannon Swift, Christine Feierabend, Testi Sherif, Susan Sansone, Laercio DaSilva, James L Gulley, Arlene Sirajuddin, Stephanie Harmon, Arun Rajan, Baris Turkbey, Chen Zhao","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.12.4.046501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) relies solely on one-dimensional measurements to evaluate tumor response to treatments. However, thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), which frequently metastasize to the pleural cavity, exhibit a curvilinear morphology that complicates accurate measurement. To address this, we developed a physician-guided deep learning model and performed a retrospective study based on a patient cohort derived from clinical trials, aiming at efficient and reproducible volumetric assessments of TETs.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We used 231 computed tomography scans comprising 572 TETs from 81 patients. Tumors within the scans were identified and manually outlined to develop a ground truth that was used to measure model performance. TETs were characterized by their general location within the chest cavity: lung parenchyma, pleura, or mediastinum. Model performance was quantified on an unseen test set of 61 scans by mask Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), tumor DSC, absolute volume difference, and relative volume difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 81 patients: 47 (58.0%) had thymic carcinoma; the remaining patients had thymoma B1, B2, B2/B3, or B3. The artificial intelligence (AI) model achieved an overall DSC of 0.77 per scan when provided with boxes surrounding the tumors as identified by physicians, corresponding to a mean absolute volume difference between the AI measurement and the ground truth of <math><mrow><mn>16.1</mn> <mtext>  </mtext> <msup><mrow><mi>cm</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> and a mean relative volume difference of 22%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have successfully developed a robust annotation workflow and AI segmentation model for analyzing advanced TETs. The model has been integrated into the Picture Archiving and Communication System alongside RECIST measurements to enhance outcome assessments for patients with metastatic TETs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"12 4","pages":"046501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician-guided deep learning model for assessing thymic epithelial tumor volume.\",\"authors\":\"Nirmal Choradia, Nathan Lay, Alex Chen, James Latanski, Meredith McAdams, Shannon Swift, Christine Feierabend, Testi Sherif, Susan Sansone, Laercio DaSilva, James L Gulley, Arlene Sirajuddin, Stephanie Harmon, Arun Rajan, Baris Turkbey, Chen Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JMI.12.4.046501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) relies solely on one-dimensional measurements to evaluate tumor response to treatments. However, thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), which frequently metastasize to the pleural cavity, exhibit a curvilinear morphology that complicates accurate measurement. To address this, we developed a physician-guided deep learning model and performed a retrospective study based on a patient cohort derived from clinical trials, aiming at efficient and reproducible volumetric assessments of TETs.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We used 231 computed tomography scans comprising 572 TETs from 81 patients. Tumors within the scans were identified and manually outlined to develop a ground truth that was used to measure model performance. TETs were characterized by their general location within the chest cavity: lung parenchyma, pleura, or mediastinum. Model performance was quantified on an unseen test set of 61 scans by mask Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), tumor DSC, absolute volume difference, and relative volume difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 81 patients: 47 (58.0%) had thymic carcinoma; the remaining patients had thymoma B1, B2, B2/B3, or B3. The artificial intelligence (AI) model achieved an overall DSC of 0.77 per scan when provided with boxes surrounding the tumors as identified by physicians, corresponding to a mean absolute volume difference between the AI measurement and the ground truth of <math><mrow><mn>16.1</mn> <mtext>  </mtext> <msup><mrow><mi>cm</mi></mrow> <mrow><mn>3</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> </math> and a mean relative volume difference of 22%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have successfully developed a robust annotation workflow and AI segmentation model for analyzing advanced TETs. The model has been integrated into the Picture Archiving and Communication System alongside RECIST measurements to enhance outcome assessments for patients with metastatic TETs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"046501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.4.046501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.12.4.046501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:实体肿瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)仅依赖于一维测量来评估肿瘤对治疗的反应。然而,胸腺上皮肿瘤(TETs)经常转移到胸膜腔,表现出曲线形态,使精确测量复杂化。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一个医生指导的深度学习模型,并基于来自临床试验的患者队列进行了一项回顾性研究,旨在对TETs进行有效和可重复的体积评估。方法:我们使用了231次计算机断层扫描,包括来自81名患者的572次tet。扫描中的肿瘤被识别并手动勾画出来,以建立一个用于测量模型性能的基本事实。tet的特征在于其在胸腔内的一般位置:肺实质、胸膜或纵隔。通过掩模骰子相似系数(DSC)、肿瘤DSC、绝对体积差和相对体积差对61次扫描的未见测试集的模型性能进行量化。结果:我们纳入81例患者:47例(58.0%)患有胸腺癌;其余患者为胸腺瘤B1、B2、B2/B3或B3。当提供医生识别的肿瘤周围的盒子时,人工智能(AI)模型每次扫描的总体DSC为0.77,对应于AI测量值与地面真实值之间的平均绝对体积差为16.1 cm 3,平均相对体积差为22%。结论:我们成功开发了一个鲁棒的注释工作流和AI分割模型,用于分析高级考试。该模型已与RECIST测量一起集成到图像存档和通信系统中,以增强对转移性tet患者的结果评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physician-guided deep learning model for assessing thymic epithelial tumor volume.

Purpose: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) relies solely on one-dimensional measurements to evaluate tumor response to treatments. However, thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), which frequently metastasize to the pleural cavity, exhibit a curvilinear morphology that complicates accurate measurement. To address this, we developed a physician-guided deep learning model and performed a retrospective study based on a patient cohort derived from clinical trials, aiming at efficient and reproducible volumetric assessments of TETs.

Approach: We used 231 computed tomography scans comprising 572 TETs from 81 patients. Tumors within the scans were identified and manually outlined to develop a ground truth that was used to measure model performance. TETs were characterized by their general location within the chest cavity: lung parenchyma, pleura, or mediastinum. Model performance was quantified on an unseen test set of 61 scans by mask Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), tumor DSC, absolute volume difference, and relative volume difference.

Results: We included 81 patients: 47 (58.0%) had thymic carcinoma; the remaining patients had thymoma B1, B2, B2/B3, or B3. The artificial intelligence (AI) model achieved an overall DSC of 0.77 per scan when provided with boxes surrounding the tumors as identified by physicians, corresponding to a mean absolute volume difference between the AI measurement and the ground truth of 16.1    cm 3 and a mean relative volume difference of 22%.

Conclusion: We have successfully developed a robust annotation workflow and AI segmentation model for analyzing advanced TETs. The model has been integrated into the Picture Archiving and Communication System alongside RECIST measurements to enhance outcome assessments for patients with metastatic TETs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging
Journal of Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信