埃塞俄比亚Butajira地区宫颈癌筛查研究中的知情同意。

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Global Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-08-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/11287462.2025.2542593
Lidya Genene Abebe, Abigiya Wondimagegnehu, Laith A Labban, Brhanu Teka, Andreas M Kaufmann, Tamrat Abebe, Eva J Kantelhardt, Adamu Addissie, Muluken Gizaw
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚Butajira地区宫颈癌筛查研究中的知情同意。","authors":"Lidya Genene Abebe, Abigiya Wondimagegnehu, Laith A Labban, Brhanu Teka, Andreas M Kaufmann, Tamrat Abebe, Eva J Kantelhardt, Adamu Addissie, Muluken Gizaw","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2025.2542593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical cancer screening remains limited in developing countries due to barriers such as lack of convenience and privacy. These challenges hinder both screening uptake and the process of obtaining informed consent. This study aimed to explore ways to address these barriers and support ethical participation in screening research. The study was conducted in three rural and one urban kebele in Butajira, Southern Ethiopia. A total of 58 participants - including community elders, religious leaders, women's representatives, and traditional association leaders - were selected through purposive sampling for focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Two interview guides were used to explore consent, decision-making, and screening preferences. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis via QCAmap software. Participants generally understood the concept of voluntary participation but emphasized the need for clear communication about benefits. Although women could decide independently, many noted the importance of involving husbands. Initial suspicion about written consent was addressed through trust-building. A strong preference emerged for female providers during consent and procedures to enhance comfort. Self-sampling raised concerns about technical difficulty and cultural norms. Addressing cultural and ethical concerns is vital for improving cervical cancer screening participation. Insights from this study should guide future research and interventions in similar settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":"36 1","pages":"2542593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informed consent in cervical cancer screening research in Butajira district, Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Lidya Genene Abebe, Abigiya Wondimagegnehu, Laith A Labban, Brhanu Teka, Andreas M Kaufmann, Tamrat Abebe, Eva J Kantelhardt, Adamu Addissie, Muluken Gizaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11287462.2025.2542593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cervical cancer screening remains limited in developing countries due to barriers such as lack of convenience and privacy. These challenges hinder both screening uptake and the process of obtaining informed consent. This study aimed to explore ways to address these barriers and support ethical participation in screening research. The study was conducted in three rural and one urban kebele in Butajira, Southern Ethiopia. A total of 58 participants - including community elders, religious leaders, women's representatives, and traditional association leaders - were selected through purposive sampling for focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Two interview guides were used to explore consent, decision-making, and screening preferences. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis via QCAmap software. Participants generally understood the concept of voluntary participation but emphasized the need for clear communication about benefits. Although women could decide independently, many noted the importance of involving husbands. Initial suspicion about written consent was addressed through trust-building. A strong preference emerged for female providers during consent and procedures to enhance comfort. Self-sampling raised concerns about technical difficulty and cultural norms. Addressing cultural and ethical concerns is vital for improving cervical cancer screening participation. Insights from this study should guide future research and interventions in similar settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"2542593\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344718/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2025.2542593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2025.2542593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于缺乏便利和隐私等障碍,宫颈癌筛查在发展中国家仍然有限。这些挑战既阻碍了筛查的接受,也阻碍了获得知情同意的过程。本研究旨在探索解决这些障碍的方法,并支持筛查研究中的道德参与。这项研究是在埃塞俄比亚南部Butajira的三个农村和一个城市kebele进行的。通过有目的的抽样,共选择了58名参与者,包括社区长老、宗教领袖、妇女代表和传统协会领袖,进行焦点小组讨论和深入访谈。使用两个访谈指南来探讨同意、决策和筛选偏好。数据分析采用QCAmap软件进行定性内容分析。与会者一般理解自愿参与的概念,但强调必须就利益进行明确的沟通。虽然妇女可以独立决定,但许多人指出丈夫参与的重要性。最初对书面同意的怀疑通过建立信任得到解决。在同意和程序中出现了对女性提供者的强烈偏好,以提高舒适度。自我抽样引起了对技术难度和文化规范的担忧。解决文化和伦理问题对于提高宫颈癌筛查的参与度至关重要。这项研究的见解应该指导未来在类似情况下的研究和干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informed consent in cervical cancer screening research in Butajira district, Ethiopia.

Cervical cancer screening remains limited in developing countries due to barriers such as lack of convenience and privacy. These challenges hinder both screening uptake and the process of obtaining informed consent. This study aimed to explore ways to address these barriers and support ethical participation in screening research. The study was conducted in three rural and one urban kebele in Butajira, Southern Ethiopia. A total of 58 participants - including community elders, religious leaders, women's representatives, and traditional association leaders - were selected through purposive sampling for focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Two interview guides were used to explore consent, decision-making, and screening preferences. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis via QCAmap software. Participants generally understood the concept of voluntary participation but emphasized the need for clear communication about benefits. Although women could decide independently, many noted the importance of involving husbands. Initial suspicion about written consent was addressed through trust-building. A strong preference emerged for female providers during consent and procedures to enhance comfort. Self-sampling raised concerns about technical difficulty and cultural norms. Addressing cultural and ethical concerns is vital for improving cervical cancer screening participation. Insights from this study should guide future research and interventions in similar settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信