与健康皮肤相比,糖尿病足部感染微生物组的散弹枪宏基因组研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Nerdjes Ferhaoui, Mohammed Sebaihia, Tsuyoshi Sekizuka, Makoto Kuroda
{"title":"与健康皮肤相比,糖尿病足部感染微生物组的散弹枪宏基因组研究","authors":"Nerdjes Ferhaoui, Mohammed Sebaihia, Tsuyoshi Sekizuka, Makoto Kuroda","doi":"10.1111/wrr.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a major complication of diabetes, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Host factors and microorganisms in DFI can disrupt healing processes, leading to chronic, non-healing wounds. The aim of this study was to characterise the microbiome of DFIs and contralateral healthy foot skin (CHFS). Thirty-two diabetic patients were enrolled in this study. Samples were obtained from DFIs and CHFS from the same patient. The microbiome was profiled using metagenomic shotgun sequencing. All the samples were polymicrobial, with a predominance of the obligate anaerobes belonging to Bacteroidetes in PEDIS 4. While PEDIS 3 and 2 were dominated by Proteobacteria. CHFS showed similar bacterial composition across all grades of severity, and the most abundant genera detected were Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Cutibacterium. The CHFS was more diverse than DFIs in PEDIS 3 and 4. However, DFIs and CHFS in PEDIS 2 present similar diversity. In addition, DFIs of this grade exhibited a high proportion of Corynebacterium as well as CHFS. PCoA analysis demonstrated that the community structure of DFIs was different from that of CHFS, with Prevotella, Bacteroides, and Porphyromonas the main contributors to the clustering. Neighbour-Net analyses revealed that DFIs exhibited lower diversity compared to CHFS and harboured a more homogeneous dominant bacterial community. Our study revealed a high abundance of obligate anaerobes, including Bacteroides, Prevotella, Morganella, and Porphyromonas, in more severe infections; along with a decrease in microbial diversity. Additionally, there was a decrease in the abundance of key bacteria from the normal skin microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":"33 4","pages":"e70074"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shotgun Metagenomic Investigation of the Microbiome in Diabetic Foot Infections Compared to Healthy Skin.\",\"authors\":\"Nerdjes Ferhaoui, Mohammed Sebaihia, Tsuyoshi Sekizuka, Makoto Kuroda\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/wrr.70074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a major complication of diabetes, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Host factors and microorganisms in DFI can disrupt healing processes, leading to chronic, non-healing wounds. The aim of this study was to characterise the microbiome of DFIs and contralateral healthy foot skin (CHFS). Thirty-two diabetic patients were enrolled in this study. Samples were obtained from DFIs and CHFS from the same patient. The microbiome was profiled using metagenomic shotgun sequencing. All the samples were polymicrobial, with a predominance of the obligate anaerobes belonging to Bacteroidetes in PEDIS 4. While PEDIS 3 and 2 were dominated by Proteobacteria. CHFS showed similar bacterial composition across all grades of severity, and the most abundant genera detected were Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Cutibacterium. The CHFS was more diverse than DFIs in PEDIS 3 and 4. However, DFIs and CHFS in PEDIS 2 present similar diversity. In addition, DFIs of this grade exhibited a high proportion of Corynebacterium as well as CHFS. PCoA analysis demonstrated that the community structure of DFIs was different from that of CHFS, with Prevotella, Bacteroides, and Porphyromonas the main contributors to the clustering. Neighbour-Net analyses revealed that DFIs exhibited lower diversity compared to CHFS and harboured a more homogeneous dominant bacterial community. Our study revealed a high abundance of obligate anaerobes, including Bacteroides, Prevotella, Morganella, and Porphyromonas, in more severe infections; along with a decrease in microbial diversity. Additionally, there was a decrease in the abundance of key bacteria from the normal skin microbiota.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wound Repair and Regeneration\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"e70074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wound Repair and Regeneration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病足感染(DFI)是糖尿病的主要并发症,发病率和死亡率都很高。DFI中的宿主因子和微生物可以破坏愈合过程,导致慢性,不愈合的伤口。本研究的目的是表征dfi和对侧健康足部皮肤(CHFS)的微生物组。32名糖尿病患者参加了这项研究。样本取自同一患者的dfi和CHFS。使用宏基因组霰弹枪测序对微生物组进行分析。所有样本均为多微生物,PEDIS 4中专性厌氧菌属Bacteroidetes占优势。而PEDIS 3和2以Proteobacteria为主。CHFS在所有严重程度中显示相似的细菌组成,检测到的最丰富的属是杆状杆菌、葡萄球菌、假单胞菌和表皮杆菌。在PEDIS 3和4中,CHFS比dfi更多样化。然而,在PEDIS 2中,dfi和CHFS表现出类似的多样性。此外,该级别的dfi显示出高比例的棒状杆菌和CHFS。PCoA分析表明,dfi的群落结构与CHFS不同,以普雷沃氏菌、拟杆菌和卟啉单胞菌为主。neighbor - net分析显示,与CHFS相比,dfi表现出更低的多样性,并且拥有更均匀的优势细菌群落。我们的研究显示,在更严重的感染中,专性厌氧菌的丰度很高,包括拟杆菌、普雷沃氏菌、摩根菌和卟啉单胞菌;伴随着微生物多样性的减少。此外,正常皮肤微生物群中关键细菌的丰度也有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shotgun Metagenomic Investigation of the Microbiome in Diabetic Foot Infections Compared to Healthy Skin.

Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a major complication of diabetes, causing significant morbidity and mortality. Host factors and microorganisms in DFI can disrupt healing processes, leading to chronic, non-healing wounds. The aim of this study was to characterise the microbiome of DFIs and contralateral healthy foot skin (CHFS). Thirty-two diabetic patients were enrolled in this study. Samples were obtained from DFIs and CHFS from the same patient. The microbiome was profiled using metagenomic shotgun sequencing. All the samples were polymicrobial, with a predominance of the obligate anaerobes belonging to Bacteroidetes in PEDIS 4. While PEDIS 3 and 2 were dominated by Proteobacteria. CHFS showed similar bacterial composition across all grades of severity, and the most abundant genera detected were Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Cutibacterium. The CHFS was more diverse than DFIs in PEDIS 3 and 4. However, DFIs and CHFS in PEDIS 2 present similar diversity. In addition, DFIs of this grade exhibited a high proportion of Corynebacterium as well as CHFS. PCoA analysis demonstrated that the community structure of DFIs was different from that of CHFS, with Prevotella, Bacteroides, and Porphyromonas the main contributors to the clustering. Neighbour-Net analyses revealed that DFIs exhibited lower diversity compared to CHFS and harboured a more homogeneous dominant bacterial community. Our study revealed a high abundance of obligate anaerobes, including Bacteroides, Prevotella, Morganella, and Porphyromonas, in more severe infections; along with a decrease in microbial diversity. Additionally, there was a decrease in the abundance of key bacteria from the normal skin microbiota.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Wound Repair and Regeneration 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others. Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信