评估眼科转移到学术一级创伤医院的疗效:诊断准确性和干预率。

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Blake Hopkin, Thellea Leveque, Mary Kim, Anna McEvoy, Karine Bojikian, Jennifer T Yu, Shu Feng
{"title":"评估眼科转移到学术一级创伤医院的疗效:诊断准确性和干预率。","authors":"Blake Hopkin, Thellea Leveque, Mary Kim, Anna McEvoy, Karine Bojikian, Jennifer T Yu, Shu Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.07.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize ophthalmic transfers from hospital, emergency department (ED), and urgent care settings to an academic level 1 trauma center and to evaluate the accuracy of transferring diagnoses and rate of intervention after transfer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All patients transferred from outside hospitals, EDs, and urgent care centers accepted by the ophthalmology service at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, Washington, from February 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transfer center records were reviewed for patient demographics, transfer facility, method of transport, transfer diagnosis, time from acceptance of transfer to patient arrival, and whether the patient was seen by or discussed with an eye care provider (ophthalmologist or optometrist) before the transfer call. Ophthalmology notes were reviewed for final diagnosis, patient disposition, and procedural interventions within 1 month of transfer. Fisher exact tests were used to compare accuracy of transfer diagnoses and rate of intervention or admission between those with and without an in-person evaluation by an eye care provider before transfer.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Accuracy of transfer diagnoses and rate of procedural interventions or admission after transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 685 total transfers, 6.1% of patients received an in-person evaluation by an eye care provider before transfer, and 11.3% were discussed with an eye care provider from the transferring facility. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) travel distance was 30 (16-57) miles, and the median (IQR) time from transfer acceptance to arrival was 216 (158-314) minutes. Transfer diagnoses were accurate in less than half (48.9%) of cases. Half (50.2%) of all transferred patients were discharged from the ED and underwent no procedural intervention within 1 month of transfer. Patients evaluated in-person by an eye care provider before transfer were more likely to have an accurate transfer diagnosis (90.5% vs. 66.3%, P < 0.001) and to require admission or procedural intervention (90.5% vs. 46.8%, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy and likelihood of procedural intervention or admission are higher in patients who undergo an ophthalmic or optometric examination before hospital transfer, suggesting that standardized pretransfer evaluation protocols could enhance diagnostic precision and optimize resource use.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.</p>","PeriodicalId":19533,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Efficacy of Ophthalmic Transfers to an Academic Level 1 Trauma Hospital: Diagnostic Accuracy and Intervention Rates.\",\"authors\":\"Blake Hopkin, Thellea Leveque, Mary Kim, Anna McEvoy, Karine Bojikian, Jennifer T Yu, Shu Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.07.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize ophthalmic transfers from hospital, emergency department (ED), and urgent care settings to an academic level 1 trauma center and to evaluate the accuracy of transferring diagnoses and rate of intervention after transfer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All patients transferred from outside hospitals, EDs, and urgent care centers accepted by the ophthalmology service at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, Washington, from February 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transfer center records were reviewed for patient demographics, transfer facility, method of transport, transfer diagnosis, time from acceptance of transfer to patient arrival, and whether the patient was seen by or discussed with an eye care provider (ophthalmologist or optometrist) before the transfer call. Ophthalmology notes were reviewed for final diagnosis, patient disposition, and procedural interventions within 1 month of transfer. Fisher exact tests were used to compare accuracy of transfer diagnoses and rate of intervention or admission between those with and without an in-person evaluation by an eye care provider before transfer.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Accuracy of transfer diagnoses and rate of procedural interventions or admission after transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 685 total transfers, 6.1% of patients received an in-person evaluation by an eye care provider before transfer, and 11.3% were discussed with an eye care provider from the transferring facility. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) travel distance was 30 (16-57) miles, and the median (IQR) time from transfer acceptance to arrival was 216 (158-314) minutes. Transfer diagnoses were accurate in less than half (48.9%) of cases. Half (50.2%) of all transferred patients were discharged from the ED and underwent no procedural intervention within 1 month of transfer. Patients evaluated in-person by an eye care provider before transfer were more likely to have an accurate transfer diagnosis (90.5% vs. 66.3%, P < 0.001) and to require admission or procedural intervention (90.5% vs. 46.8%, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy and likelihood of procedural intervention or admission are higher in patients who undergo an ophthalmic or optometric examination before hospital transfer, suggesting that standardized pretransfer evaluation protocols could enhance diagnostic precision and optimize resource use.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.07.037\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.07.037","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析眼科从医院、急诊科(ED)和紧急护理机构转移到学术一级创伤中心的特点,并评估转移诊断的准确性和转移后的干预率。设计:回顾性横断面研究对象:所有在2022年2月1日至2023年1月31日期间从华盛顿州西雅图港景医疗中心眼科接受的外部医院、急诊科和急诊中心转来的患者。方法:回顾转诊中心的记录,包括患者人口统计、转诊设施、转诊方式、转诊诊断、从接受转诊到患者到达的时间,以及患者在转诊前是否与眼科医生(眼科医生或验光师)见过或讨论过。在转院1个月内回顾眼科记录,以确定最终诊断、患者处置和手术干预。采用Fisher精确检验比较转移诊断的准确性和转移前是否接受眼科护理人员亲自评估的患者的干预率或入院率。结果:在总共685例转院患者中,6.1%的患者在转院前接受了眼科护理人员的亲自评估,11.3%的患者与转院机构的眼科护理人员进行了讨论。中位(IQR)旅行距离为30(16-57)英里,从接受中转到抵达的中位(IQR)时间为216(158-314)分钟。转移诊断的准确率不到一半(48.9%)。一半(50.2%)的转院患者在转院1个月内从急诊科出院且未接受任何程序性干预。转移前由眼科护理人员亲自评估的患者更有可能获得准确的转移诊断(90.5%对66.3%,p < 0.001),更有可能需要入院或手术干预(90.5%对46.8%,p < 0.001)。结论:转院前接受眼科或验光检查的患者诊断准确性和程序性干预或入院的可能性更高,表明标准化的转院前评估方案可以提高诊断精度,优化资源利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Efficacy of Ophthalmic Transfers to an Academic Level 1 Trauma Hospital: Diagnostic Accuracy and Intervention Rates.

Purpose: To characterize ophthalmic transfers from hospital, emergency department (ED), and urgent care settings to an academic level 1 trauma center and to evaluate the accuracy of transferring diagnoses and rate of intervention after transfer.

Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Participants: All patients transferred from outside hospitals, EDs, and urgent care centers accepted by the ophthalmology service at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, Washington, from February 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023.

Methods: Transfer center records were reviewed for patient demographics, transfer facility, method of transport, transfer diagnosis, time from acceptance of transfer to patient arrival, and whether the patient was seen by or discussed with an eye care provider (ophthalmologist or optometrist) before the transfer call. Ophthalmology notes were reviewed for final diagnosis, patient disposition, and procedural interventions within 1 month of transfer. Fisher exact tests were used to compare accuracy of transfer diagnoses and rate of intervention or admission between those with and without an in-person evaluation by an eye care provider before transfer.

Main outcome measures: Accuracy of transfer diagnoses and rate of procedural interventions or admission after transfer.

Results: Of 685 total transfers, 6.1% of patients received an in-person evaluation by an eye care provider before transfer, and 11.3% were discussed with an eye care provider from the transferring facility. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) travel distance was 30 (16-57) miles, and the median (IQR) time from transfer acceptance to arrival was 216 (158-314) minutes. Transfer diagnoses were accurate in less than half (48.9%) of cases. Half (50.2%) of all transferred patients were discharged from the ED and underwent no procedural intervention within 1 month of transfer. Patients evaluated in-person by an eye care provider before transfer were more likely to have an accurate transfer diagnosis (90.5% vs. 66.3%, P < 0.001) and to require admission or procedural intervention (90.5% vs. 46.8%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Diagnostic accuracy and likelihood of procedural intervention or admission are higher in patients who undergo an ophthalmic or optometric examination before hospital transfer, suggesting that standardized pretransfer evaluation protocols could enhance diagnostic precision and optimize resource use.

Financial disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ophthalmology, from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, contributes to society by publishing research in clinical and basic science related to vision.It upholds excellence through unbiased peer-review, fostering innovation, promoting discovery, and encouraging lifelong learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信