上尿路上皮癌的淋巴结切除术:临床见解和争议(综述)。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Oncology reports Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI:10.3892/or.2025.8970
Dihao Lv, Yinglong Huang, Haihao Li, Shi Fu, Chen Gong, Chadanfeng Yang, Jiansong Wang, Haifeng Wang, Zhiyong Tan, Mingxia Ding
{"title":"上尿路上皮癌的淋巴结切除术:临床见解和争议(综述)。","authors":"Dihao Lv, Yinglong Huang, Haihao Li, Shi Fu, Chen Gong, Chadanfeng Yang, Jiansong Wang, Haifeng Wang, Zhiyong Tan, Mingxia Ding","doi":"10.3892/or.2025.8970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a relatively rare but highly malignant tumor arising from the renal pelvis and the urothelial layer of the ureter, accounts for 5‑10% of all urothelial malignancies. The lack of specific early symptoms commonly results in a delayed diagnosis, with >60% of cases being diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. Lymph node involvement can critically affect the clinical outcomes, thus serving as a key prognostic indicator, guiding both staging protocols and treatment strategies. Lymphadenectomy, typically performed alongside radical nephroureterectomy, not only assists in evaluating the extent of the regional metastases, but also plays a critical role in guiding both staging and treatment planning. Although several studies have suggested that a more extensive lymph node dissection (LND) can improve cancer‑specific survival and disease‑free survival rates, there is still no consensus on the optimal extent of dissection or a universally accepted surgical template. The present review aims to summarize the existing evidence on the efficacy of LND in UTUC, thus emphasizing its potential in staging, outcome prediction and possible survival benefits. The review also aims to address the challenges caused by inconsistent LND practices and the limited availability of robust prospective data. Furthermore, it discusses novel biomarkers that could improve patient classification, and proposes future research directions to improve the management of UTUC through more personalized and evidence‑driven LND strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19527,"journal":{"name":"Oncology reports","volume":"54 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lymphadenectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Clinical insights and controversies (Review).\",\"authors\":\"Dihao Lv, Yinglong Huang, Haihao Li, Shi Fu, Chen Gong, Chadanfeng Yang, Jiansong Wang, Haifeng Wang, Zhiyong Tan, Mingxia Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.3892/or.2025.8970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a relatively rare but highly malignant tumor arising from the renal pelvis and the urothelial layer of the ureter, accounts for 5‑10% of all urothelial malignancies. The lack of specific early symptoms commonly results in a delayed diagnosis, with >60% of cases being diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. Lymph node involvement can critically affect the clinical outcomes, thus serving as a key prognostic indicator, guiding both staging protocols and treatment strategies. Lymphadenectomy, typically performed alongside radical nephroureterectomy, not only assists in evaluating the extent of the regional metastases, but also plays a critical role in guiding both staging and treatment planning. Although several studies have suggested that a more extensive lymph node dissection (LND) can improve cancer‑specific survival and disease‑free survival rates, there is still no consensus on the optimal extent of dissection or a universally accepted surgical template. The present review aims to summarize the existing evidence on the efficacy of LND in UTUC, thus emphasizing its potential in staging, outcome prediction and possible survival benefits. The review also aims to address the challenges caused by inconsistent LND practices and the limited availability of robust prospective data. Furthermore, it discusses novel biomarkers that could improve patient classification, and proposes future research directions to improve the management of UTUC through more personalized and evidence‑driven LND strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology reports\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365877/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2025.8970\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2025.8970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)是一种相对罕见但高度恶性的肿瘤,起源于肾盂和输尿管的尿路上皮层,占所有尿路上皮恶性肿瘤的5 - 10%。缺乏具体的早期症状通常会导致诊断延迟,大约60%的病例在疾病的晚期被诊断出来。淋巴结受累可严重影响临床结果,因此作为关键的预后指标,指导分期方案和治疗策略。淋巴结切除术通常与根治性肾输尿管切除术同时进行,不仅有助于评估局部转移的程度,而且在指导分期和治疗计划方面起着关键作用。尽管一些研究表明,更广泛的淋巴结清扫(LND)可以提高癌症特异性生存率和无病生存率,但对于最佳清扫范围或普遍接受的手术模板仍未达成共识。本综述旨在总结LND在UTUC中疗效的现有证据,从而强调其在分期、预后预测和可能的生存益处方面的潜力。该综述还旨在解决不一致的LND实践和可靠的前瞻性数据的有限可用性所带来的挑战。此外,本文还讨论了可以改善患者分类的新型生物标志物,并提出了未来的研究方向,通过更加个性化和证据驱动的LND策略来改善UTUC的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lymphadenectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Clinical insights and controversies (Review).

Lymphadenectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Clinical insights and controversies (Review).

Lymphadenectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Clinical insights and controversies (Review).

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a relatively rare but highly malignant tumor arising from the renal pelvis and the urothelial layer of the ureter, accounts for 5‑10% of all urothelial malignancies. The lack of specific early symptoms commonly results in a delayed diagnosis, with >60% of cases being diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. Lymph node involvement can critically affect the clinical outcomes, thus serving as a key prognostic indicator, guiding both staging protocols and treatment strategies. Lymphadenectomy, typically performed alongside radical nephroureterectomy, not only assists in evaluating the extent of the regional metastases, but also plays a critical role in guiding both staging and treatment planning. Although several studies have suggested that a more extensive lymph node dissection (LND) can improve cancer‑specific survival and disease‑free survival rates, there is still no consensus on the optimal extent of dissection or a universally accepted surgical template. The present review aims to summarize the existing evidence on the efficacy of LND in UTUC, thus emphasizing its potential in staging, outcome prediction and possible survival benefits. The review also aims to address the challenges caused by inconsistent LND practices and the limited availability of robust prospective data. Furthermore, it discusses novel biomarkers that could improve patient classification, and proposes future research directions to improve the management of UTUC through more personalized and evidence‑driven LND strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology reports
Oncology reports 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Oncology Reports is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal devoted to the publication of high quality original studies and reviews concerning a broad and comprehensive view of fundamental and applied research in oncology, focusing on carcinogenesis, metastasis and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信