平台方法作为佐剂疫苗非临床安全性评估的可行选择。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Eric Destexhe
{"title":"平台方法作为佐剂疫苗非临床安全性评估的可行选择。","authors":"Eric Destexhe","doi":"10.1038/s41541-025-01245-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccine platform technologies are reproducible, standardized manufacturing and development methods that may be leveraged to streamline regulatory approval of new vaccines. To evaluate the plausibility of a platform approach for the nonclinical safety assessment of adjuvanted recombinant-protein vaccine candidates, a comparative analysis was performed on repeat-dose toxicity data of four AS01 adjuvanted candidate vaccines from five rabbit studies. Groups of animals received AS01-adjuvanted vaccines, AS01 alone, or antigens alone on multiple occasions. All vaccines were well-tolerated, showing mainly transient signs of inflammation after the administrations, consistent across all vaccines and similar to AS01. The antigens alone induced only minimal signs of inflammation, indicating that AS01 mainly drives the innate immune response. These findings support the plausibility of a platform approach for the nonclinical safety assessment of adjuvanted vaccines, potentially reducing animal use and expediting first-in-human trials by streamlining or eliminating some nonclinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19335,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Vaccines","volume":"10 1","pages":"192"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A platform approach as a plausible option for nonclinical safety assessment of adjuvanted vaccines.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Destexhe\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41541-025-01245-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Vaccine platform technologies are reproducible, standardized manufacturing and development methods that may be leveraged to streamline regulatory approval of new vaccines. To evaluate the plausibility of a platform approach for the nonclinical safety assessment of adjuvanted recombinant-protein vaccine candidates, a comparative analysis was performed on repeat-dose toxicity data of four AS01 adjuvanted candidate vaccines from five rabbit studies. Groups of animals received AS01-adjuvanted vaccines, AS01 alone, or antigens alone on multiple occasions. All vaccines were well-tolerated, showing mainly transient signs of inflammation after the administrations, consistent across all vaccines and similar to AS01. The antigens alone induced only minimal signs of inflammation, indicating that AS01 mainly drives the innate immune response. These findings support the plausibility of a platform approach for the nonclinical safety assessment of adjuvanted vaccines, potentially reducing animal use and expediting first-in-human trials by streamlining or eliminating some nonclinical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Vaccines\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350924/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Vaccines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-025-01245-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-025-01245-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疫苗平台技术是可重复的标准化生产和开发方法,可用于简化新疫苗的监管审批。为了评估一种平台方法用于佐剂重组蛋白候选疫苗非临床安全性评估的可行性,对来自5个兔子研究的4种AS01佐剂候选疫苗的重复剂量毒性数据进行了比较分析。多组动物分别接种AS01佐剂疫苗、单独接种AS01疫苗或单独接种抗原疫苗。所有疫苗都具有良好的耐受性,在接种后主要表现出短暂的炎症症状,所有疫苗都是一致的,与AS01相似。抗原单独引起的炎症症状很少,表明AS01主要驱动先天免疫反应。这些发现支持了采用平台方法对佐剂疫苗进行非临床安全性评估的可行性,通过简化或消除一些非临床研究,可能减少动物使用并加快首次人体试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A platform approach as a plausible option for nonclinical safety assessment of adjuvanted vaccines.

Vaccine platform technologies are reproducible, standardized manufacturing and development methods that may be leveraged to streamline regulatory approval of new vaccines. To evaluate the plausibility of a platform approach for the nonclinical safety assessment of adjuvanted recombinant-protein vaccine candidates, a comparative analysis was performed on repeat-dose toxicity data of four AS01 adjuvanted candidate vaccines from five rabbit studies. Groups of animals received AS01-adjuvanted vaccines, AS01 alone, or antigens alone on multiple occasions. All vaccines were well-tolerated, showing mainly transient signs of inflammation after the administrations, consistent across all vaccines and similar to AS01. The antigens alone induced only minimal signs of inflammation, indicating that AS01 mainly drives the innate immune response. These findings support the plausibility of a platform approach for the nonclinical safety assessment of adjuvanted vaccines, potentially reducing animal use and expediting first-in-human trials by streamlining or eliminating some nonclinical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Vaccines
NPJ Vaccines Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
146
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Online-only and open access, npj Vaccines is dedicated to highlighting the most important scientific advances in vaccine research and development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信