紫杉醇包被球囊治疗多层支架内再狭窄:AGENT IDE亚组分析。

IF 22.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ajay J Kirtane, Richard Shlofmitz, Jeffrey Moses, William Bachinsky, Suhail Dohad, Steven Rudick, Robert Stoler, Brian K Jefferson, William Nicholson, John Altman, Cinthia Bateman, Amar Krishnaswamy, J Aaron Grantham, Francis J Zidar, Jennifer A Tremmel, Cindy Grines, Mustafa I Ahmed, Azeem Latib, Behnam Tehrani, J Dawn Abbott, Wayne Batchelor, Rafael Cavalcante, Robert W Yeh
{"title":"紫杉醇包被球囊治疗多层支架内再狭窄:AGENT IDE亚组分析。","authors":"Ajay J Kirtane, Richard Shlofmitz, Jeffrey Moses, William Bachinsky, Suhail Dohad, Steven Rudick, Robert Stoler, Brian K Jefferson, William Nicholson, John Altman, Cinthia Bateman, Amar Krishnaswamy, J Aaron Grantham, Francis J Zidar, Jennifer A Tremmel, Cindy Grines, Mustafa I Ahmed, Azeem Latib, Behnam Tehrani, J Dawn Abbott, Wayne Batchelor, Rafael Cavalcante, Robert W Yeh","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2025.05.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) within multiple layers of stent pose a specific clinical challenge because of higher rates of recurrent restenosis as well as a desire to avoid an additional layer of stent. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) provide an alternative antiproliferative therapeutic option for multilayer ISR.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a low-dose paclitaxel-coated vs uncoated balloon among patients with multilayer or single-layer ISR in the AGENT IDE (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis) trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AGENT IDE is a prospective, multicenter trial that randomized patients with ISR (reference vessel diameter >2.0 mm to ≤4.0 mm and lesion length <26 mm) in a 2:1 allocation to paclitaxel-coated or an uncoated balloon following successful lesion preparation. Randomization was stratified by multi- vs single-layer ISR as well as by center. The primary study endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF): composite occurrence of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or cardiac death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 600 patients randomized in the trial, multilayer ISR was present in 258 (44%) patients. Patients with multilayer ISR had higher rates of TLF at 1 year compared with those with single-layer ISR (29.0% vs 15.7%, P < 0.0001). The overall study results were consistent irrespective of multilayer vs single-layer ISR (P<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.66). Among patients with multilayer ISR, TLF was lower with paclitaxel-coated balloon compared with an uncoated balloon (23.8% vs 40.0%; HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.34-0.87; P = 0.01), driven by reductions in both TLR and target vessel-related MI. Similar findings were observed among patients with single layer ISR (1-year TLF: 13.5% with paclitaxel-coated vs 20.2% with uncoated balloon; HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.37-1.11; P = 0.11), although absolute event rates were lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with ISR of multiple stent layers had higher rates of adverse stent-related events compared with patients with single-layer ISR. Treatment with a paclitaxel-coated balloon led to greater absolute risk reduction in 1-year TLF among patients with multilayer ISR compared with an uncoated balloon. (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis [ISR] [AGENT IDE]; NCT04647253).</p>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":"86 7","pages":"502-511"},"PeriodicalIF":22.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Multilayer In-Stent Restenosis: AGENT IDE Subgroup Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ajay J Kirtane, Richard Shlofmitz, Jeffrey Moses, William Bachinsky, Suhail Dohad, Steven Rudick, Robert Stoler, Brian K Jefferson, William Nicholson, John Altman, Cinthia Bateman, Amar Krishnaswamy, J Aaron Grantham, Francis J Zidar, Jennifer A Tremmel, Cindy Grines, Mustafa I Ahmed, Azeem Latib, Behnam Tehrani, J Dawn Abbott, Wayne Batchelor, Rafael Cavalcante, Robert W Yeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacc.2025.05.062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) within multiple layers of stent pose a specific clinical challenge because of higher rates of recurrent restenosis as well as a desire to avoid an additional layer of stent. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) provide an alternative antiproliferative therapeutic option for multilayer ISR.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a low-dose paclitaxel-coated vs uncoated balloon among patients with multilayer or single-layer ISR in the AGENT IDE (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis) trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AGENT IDE is a prospective, multicenter trial that randomized patients with ISR (reference vessel diameter >2.0 mm to ≤4.0 mm and lesion length <26 mm) in a 2:1 allocation to paclitaxel-coated or an uncoated balloon following successful lesion preparation. Randomization was stratified by multi- vs single-layer ISR as well as by center. The primary study endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF): composite occurrence of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or cardiac death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 600 patients randomized in the trial, multilayer ISR was present in 258 (44%) patients. Patients with multilayer ISR had higher rates of TLF at 1 year compared with those with single-layer ISR (29.0% vs 15.7%, P < 0.0001). The overall study results were consistent irrespective of multilayer vs single-layer ISR (P<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.66). Among patients with multilayer ISR, TLF was lower with paclitaxel-coated balloon compared with an uncoated balloon (23.8% vs 40.0%; HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.34-0.87; P = 0.01), driven by reductions in both TLR and target vessel-related MI. Similar findings were observed among patients with single layer ISR (1-year TLF: 13.5% with paclitaxel-coated vs 20.2% with uncoated balloon; HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.37-1.11; P = 0.11), although absolute event rates were lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with ISR of multiple stent layers had higher rates of adverse stent-related events compared with patients with single-layer ISR. Treatment with a paclitaxel-coated balloon led to greater absolute risk reduction in 1-year TLF among patients with multilayer ISR compared with an uncoated balloon. (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis [ISR] [AGENT IDE]; NCT04647253).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"86 7\",\"pages\":\"502-511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":22.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.05.062\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.05.062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多层支架内冠状动脉支架内再狭窄(ISR)患者的复发率较高,并且希望避免额外的支架层,这给临床带来了特殊的挑战。药物包被球囊(DCBs)为多层ISR提供了另一种抗增生性治疗选择。目的:在AGENT IDE(一项评估紫杉醇包被PTCA球囊导管治疗支架内再狭窄的临床试验)试验中,我们评估了多层或单层ISR患者中低剂量紫杉醇包被与未包被球囊的疗效和安全性。方法:AGENT IDE是一项前瞻性、多中心试验,将ISR(参考血管直径>2.0 mm至≤4.0 mm和病变长度)患者随机分组。结果:在试验中随机分组的600例患者中,258例(44%)患者存在多层ISR。与单层ISR患者相比,多层ISR患者1年时TLF发生率更高(29.0% vs 15.7%, P < 0.0001)。无论多层还是单层ISR,总体研究结果都是一致的(p - interaction = 0.66)。在多层ISR患者中,紫杉醇包被球囊的TLF低于未包被球囊(23.8% vs 40.0%;人力资源:0.55;95% ci: 0.34-0.87;P = 0.01),由TLR和靶血管相关心肌梗死的减少所推动。在单层ISR患者中观察到类似的结果(1年TLF:紫杉醇包被组13.5% vs未包被球囊组20.2%;人力资源:0.64;95% ci: 0.37-1.11;P = 0.11),但绝对事件发生率较低。结论:与单层ISR患者相比,多层ISR患者支架相关不良事件发生率更高。在多层ISR患者中,与未包被球囊相比,使用紫杉醇包被球囊治疗可使1年TLF的绝对风险降低。紫杉醇包被PTCA球囊导管治疗支架内再狭窄的临床研究[Agent IDE];NCT04647253)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Multilayer In-Stent Restenosis: AGENT IDE Subgroup Analysis.

Background: Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) within multiple layers of stent pose a specific clinical challenge because of higher rates of recurrent restenosis as well as a desire to avoid an additional layer of stent. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) provide an alternative antiproliferative therapeutic option for multilayer ISR.

Objectives: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a low-dose paclitaxel-coated vs uncoated balloon among patients with multilayer or single-layer ISR in the AGENT IDE (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis) trial.

Methods: AGENT IDE is a prospective, multicenter trial that randomized patients with ISR (reference vessel diameter >2.0 mm to ≤4.0 mm and lesion length <26 mm) in a 2:1 allocation to paclitaxel-coated or an uncoated balloon following successful lesion preparation. Randomization was stratified by multi- vs single-layer ISR as well as by center. The primary study endpoint was 1-year target lesion failure (TLF): composite occurrence of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or cardiac death.

Results: Of the 600 patients randomized in the trial, multilayer ISR was present in 258 (44%) patients. Patients with multilayer ISR had higher rates of TLF at 1 year compared with those with single-layer ISR (29.0% vs 15.7%, P < 0.0001). The overall study results were consistent irrespective of multilayer vs single-layer ISR (Pinteraction = 0.66). Among patients with multilayer ISR, TLF was lower with paclitaxel-coated balloon compared with an uncoated balloon (23.8% vs 40.0%; HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.34-0.87; P = 0.01), driven by reductions in both TLR and target vessel-related MI. Similar findings were observed among patients with single layer ISR (1-year TLF: 13.5% with paclitaxel-coated vs 20.2% with uncoated balloon; HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.37-1.11; P = 0.11), although absolute event rates were lower.

Conclusions: Patients with ISR of multiple stent layers had higher rates of adverse stent-related events compared with patients with single-layer ISR. Treatment with a paclitaxel-coated balloon led to greater absolute risk reduction in 1-year TLF among patients with multilayer ISR compared with an uncoated balloon. (A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis [ISR] [AGENT IDE]; NCT04647253).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信