Susan Kane Driscoll, Sean Ryan, Abigail Small, Frank Dombrowski
{"title":"采用特定场地的沉积物毒性测试制定多环芳烃在制气厂场地的修复目标。","authors":"Susan Kane Driscoll, Sean Ryan, Abigail Small, Frank Dombrowski","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this paper is to present a case study of the use of site-specific sediment toxicity data as a line of evidence for development of preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) for the protection of the community of benthic invertebrates in sediments of the Upper Fox River adjacent to the former Oshkosh, WI manufactured gas plant (MGP). Standard 28-d laboratory toxicity tests with the freshwater amphipod, Hyalella azteca, were conducted. Various exposure metrics were examined to determine which metrics were the best predictor of toxicity. Metrics included concentrations of TPAH13 and TPAH34 in sediment (with and without normalization to organic carbon), toxic units (TU) estimated from concentrations of 34 PAHs measured in sediment, and TU estimated from 34 PAHs measured in porewater using passive samplers (with and without the addition of organoclay to avoid fouling of passive samplers). Exposure-response models were used to evaluate the relationships between the various exposure metrics and toxicological responses. All of the exposure metrics provided relatively good fits of models to data and were used to calculate effect concentrations (EC20) predicted to cause 20% reduction in the endpoint (e.g., survival and biomass). The EC20 value of 119 mg/kg TPAH13 was selected for future use as a conservative and protective line of evidence to describe the nature and extent of MGP impacts at the Site. The integrated approach outlined in this study presents a scientifically defensible method for establishing site-specific remediation goals that are protective of benthic communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employing Site-Specific Sediment Toxicity Tests to Develop Remediation Goals for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons at a Manufactured Gas Plant Site.\",\"authors\":\"Susan Kane Driscoll, Sean Ryan, Abigail Small, Frank Dombrowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this paper is to present a case study of the use of site-specific sediment toxicity data as a line of evidence for development of preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) for the protection of the community of benthic invertebrates in sediments of the Upper Fox River adjacent to the former Oshkosh, WI manufactured gas plant (MGP). Standard 28-d laboratory toxicity tests with the freshwater amphipod, Hyalella azteca, were conducted. Various exposure metrics were examined to determine which metrics were the best predictor of toxicity. Metrics included concentrations of TPAH13 and TPAH34 in sediment (with and without normalization to organic carbon), toxic units (TU) estimated from concentrations of 34 PAHs measured in sediment, and TU estimated from 34 PAHs measured in porewater using passive samplers (with and without the addition of organoclay to avoid fouling of passive samplers). Exposure-response models were used to evaluate the relationships between the various exposure metrics and toxicological responses. All of the exposure metrics provided relatively good fits of models to data and were used to calculate effect concentrations (EC20) predicted to cause 20% reduction in the endpoint (e.g., survival and biomass). The EC20 value of 119 mg/kg TPAH13 was selected for future use as a conservative and protective line of evidence to describe the nature and extent of MGP impacts at the Site. The integrated approach outlined in this study presents a scientifically defensible method for establishing site-specific remediation goals that are protective of benthic communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf186\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Employing Site-Specific Sediment Toxicity Tests to Develop Remediation Goals for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons at a Manufactured Gas Plant Site.
The purpose of this paper is to present a case study of the use of site-specific sediment toxicity data as a line of evidence for development of preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) for the protection of the community of benthic invertebrates in sediments of the Upper Fox River adjacent to the former Oshkosh, WI manufactured gas plant (MGP). Standard 28-d laboratory toxicity tests with the freshwater amphipod, Hyalella azteca, were conducted. Various exposure metrics were examined to determine which metrics were the best predictor of toxicity. Metrics included concentrations of TPAH13 and TPAH34 in sediment (with and without normalization to organic carbon), toxic units (TU) estimated from concentrations of 34 PAHs measured in sediment, and TU estimated from 34 PAHs measured in porewater using passive samplers (with and without the addition of organoclay to avoid fouling of passive samplers). Exposure-response models were used to evaluate the relationships between the various exposure metrics and toxicological responses. All of the exposure metrics provided relatively good fits of models to data and were used to calculate effect concentrations (EC20) predicted to cause 20% reduction in the endpoint (e.g., survival and biomass). The EC20 value of 119 mg/kg TPAH13 was selected for future use as a conservative and protective line of evidence to describe the nature and extent of MGP impacts at the Site. The integrated approach outlined in this study presents a scientifically defensible method for establishing site-specific remediation goals that are protective of benthic communities.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.