儿童口服花生丁酸佐剂免疫治疗(OPIA):一项随机对照试验。

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Peter S Hsu, Elizabeth H Barnes, Michelle Barnes, Merilyn McArthur, Carolina Valerio, Brigitte Santner-Nanan, Gabriela Pinget, Yanan Wang, Cuong D Tran, Catherine L Lai, Isabelle M L Bosi, Tennille L Vitagliano, Laurence Macia, David McDonald, Nanju Alice Lee, Sam Mehr, Paul J Turner, Julie M Clarke, Dianne E Campbell, Ralph Nanan
{"title":"儿童口服花生丁酸佐剂免疫治疗(OPIA):一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Peter S Hsu, Elizabeth H Barnes, Michelle Barnes, Merilyn McArthur, Carolina Valerio, Brigitte Santner-Nanan, Gabriela Pinget, Yanan Wang, Cuong D Tran, Catherine L Lai, Isabelle M L Bosi, Tennille L Vitagliano, Laurence Macia, David McDonald, Nanju Alice Lee, Sam Mehr, Paul J Turner, Julie M Clarke, Dianne E Campbell, Ralph Nanan","doi":"10.1111/cea.70127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sustained unresponsiveness (SU) remains a major challenge for peanut OIT. The short chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyrate has the potential to upregulate regulatory T cells (Tregs) to improve long term tolerance. We conducted a superiority randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of the addition of daily oral butyrate to peanut OIT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peanut allergic children (aged 10-16 years) were recruited in a single-centre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial and randomised 2:2:1 to receive 12 months daily peanut OIT with HAMSB (OIT + butyrate), peanut OIT with LAMS (OIT + placebo) or no OIT (control) following an entry DBPCFC. Allocation of HAMSB and LAMS was blinded. Peanut OIT was open. Exit DBPCFC was performed after at least 6 weeks of treatment cessation. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who tolerated ≥ 1000 mg of peanut protein (cumulative dose 1449 mg) at exit DBPCFC. Adverse events and compliance were recorded. Blood Treg responses and stool SCFA analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 65 participants were enrolled (male 57%, median age 12 years). Of these 26 participants received OIT + butyrate, 26 received OIT + placebo, and 13 received standard care with no OIT (control). After 6 weeks of treatment cessation, 73% (19/26) of OIT + butyrate, 69% (18/26) of OIT + placebo (OR 95% CI = 1.21 (0.36-4.0) for OIT + butyrate relative to OIT + placebo, p = 0.76) and 0% (0/13) of the control group tolerated at least 1000 mg (cumulative dose 1449 mg) of peanut protein. The most common adverse events observed in OIT + butyrate and OIT + placebo were gastrointestinal related (73%). Treatment-related anaphylaxis occurred in eight participants; four in each OIT group (15%). There was no statistically significant difference in AE rate between OIT + butyrate and OIT + placebo.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In a first in food allergy clinical trial setting, the addition of oral butyrate to peanut OIT was well tolerated but did not enhance SU rate in our cohort.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12617000914369; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000914369; Trial was registered on 22 June 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral Peanut Immunotherapy With Butyrate Adjuvant (OPIA) in Children: A Randomised, Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Peter S Hsu, Elizabeth H Barnes, Michelle Barnes, Merilyn McArthur, Carolina Valerio, Brigitte Santner-Nanan, Gabriela Pinget, Yanan Wang, Cuong D Tran, Catherine L Lai, Isabelle M L Bosi, Tennille L Vitagliano, Laurence Macia, David McDonald, Nanju Alice Lee, Sam Mehr, Paul J Turner, Julie M Clarke, Dianne E Campbell, Ralph Nanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cea.70127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sustained unresponsiveness (SU) remains a major challenge for peanut OIT. The short chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyrate has the potential to upregulate regulatory T cells (Tregs) to improve long term tolerance. We conducted a superiority randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of the addition of daily oral butyrate to peanut OIT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peanut allergic children (aged 10-16 years) were recruited in a single-centre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial and randomised 2:2:1 to receive 12 months daily peanut OIT with HAMSB (OIT + butyrate), peanut OIT with LAMS (OIT + placebo) or no OIT (control) following an entry DBPCFC. Allocation of HAMSB and LAMS was blinded. Peanut OIT was open. Exit DBPCFC was performed after at least 6 weeks of treatment cessation. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who tolerated ≥ 1000 mg of peanut protein (cumulative dose 1449 mg) at exit DBPCFC. Adverse events and compliance were recorded. Blood Treg responses and stool SCFA analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 65 participants were enrolled (male 57%, median age 12 years). Of these 26 participants received OIT + butyrate, 26 received OIT + placebo, and 13 received standard care with no OIT (control). After 6 weeks of treatment cessation, 73% (19/26) of OIT + butyrate, 69% (18/26) of OIT + placebo (OR 95% CI = 1.21 (0.36-4.0) for OIT + butyrate relative to OIT + placebo, p = 0.76) and 0% (0/13) of the control group tolerated at least 1000 mg (cumulative dose 1449 mg) of peanut protein. The most common adverse events observed in OIT + butyrate and OIT + placebo were gastrointestinal related (73%). Treatment-related anaphylaxis occurred in eight participants; four in each OIT group (15%). There was no statistically significant difference in AE rate between OIT + butyrate and OIT + placebo.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In a first in food allergy clinical trial setting, the addition of oral butyrate to peanut OIT was well tolerated but did not enhance SU rate in our cohort.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12617000914369; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000914369; Trial was registered on 22 June 2017.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.70127\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.70127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:持续无反应性(SU)仍然是花生油的主要挑战。短链脂肪酸(SCFA)丁酸酯具有上调调节性T细胞(Tregs)以提高长期耐受性的潜力。我们进行了一项优势随机对照试验,以评估每日口服丁酸盐加入花生油脂的有效性和安全性。方法:在一项单中心随机双盲安慰剂对照试验中招募花生过敏儿童(10-16岁),并按2:2:1随机分配,在进入DBPCFC后,每天接受12个月的花生油与HAMSB(油+丁酸盐),花生油与LAMS(油+安慰剂)或不接受油(对照)。HAMSB和LAMS的分配采用盲法。花生油是开放的。停药至少6周后行退出DBPCFC。主要结局是在DBPCFC退出时耐受≥1000mg花生蛋白(累积剂量1449mg)的参与者比例。记录不良事件及依从性。进行血Treg反应和粪便SCFA分析。结果:共纳入65名参与者(男性57%,中位年龄12岁)。在这26名参与者中,26名接受OIT +丁酸盐治疗,26名接受OIT +安慰剂治疗,13名接受没有OIT的标准治疗(对照组)。停止治疗6周后,73%(19/26)的OIT +丁酸盐组,69%(18/26)的OIT +安慰剂组(相对于OIT +安慰剂,OIT +丁酸盐组OR 95% CI = 1.21 (0.36-4.0), p = 0.76)和0%(0/13)的对照组耐受至少1000 mg(累计剂量1449 mg)花生蛋白。OIT +丁酸盐组和OIT +安慰剂组观察到的最常见不良事件与胃肠道相关(73%)。8名受试者出现治疗相关过敏反应;每个OIT组4人(15%)。OIT +丁酸盐组与OIT +安慰剂组AE发生率无统计学差异。解释:在首次食物过敏临床试验中,在花生OIT中添加口服丁酸盐耐受性良好,但并未增加我们队列中的SU发生率。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR) - ACTRN12617000914369;https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000914369;试验于2017年6月22日登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral Peanut Immunotherapy With Butyrate Adjuvant (OPIA) in Children: A Randomised, Controlled Trial.

Background: Sustained unresponsiveness (SU) remains a major challenge for peanut OIT. The short chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyrate has the potential to upregulate regulatory T cells (Tregs) to improve long term tolerance. We conducted a superiority randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of the addition of daily oral butyrate to peanut OIT.

Methods: Peanut allergic children (aged 10-16 years) were recruited in a single-centre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial and randomised 2:2:1 to receive 12 months daily peanut OIT with HAMSB (OIT + butyrate), peanut OIT with LAMS (OIT + placebo) or no OIT (control) following an entry DBPCFC. Allocation of HAMSB and LAMS was blinded. Peanut OIT was open. Exit DBPCFC was performed after at least 6 weeks of treatment cessation. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who tolerated ≥ 1000 mg of peanut protein (cumulative dose 1449 mg) at exit DBPCFC. Adverse events and compliance were recorded. Blood Treg responses and stool SCFA analysis were performed.

Results: A total of 65 participants were enrolled (male 57%, median age 12 years). Of these 26 participants received OIT + butyrate, 26 received OIT + placebo, and 13 received standard care with no OIT (control). After 6 weeks of treatment cessation, 73% (19/26) of OIT + butyrate, 69% (18/26) of OIT + placebo (OR 95% CI = 1.21 (0.36-4.0) for OIT + butyrate relative to OIT + placebo, p = 0.76) and 0% (0/13) of the control group tolerated at least 1000 mg (cumulative dose 1449 mg) of peanut protein. The most common adverse events observed in OIT + butyrate and OIT + placebo were gastrointestinal related (73%). Treatment-related anaphylaxis occurred in eight participants; four in each OIT group (15%). There was no statistically significant difference in AE rate between OIT + butyrate and OIT + placebo.

Interpretation: In a first in food allergy clinical trial setting, the addition of oral butyrate to peanut OIT was well tolerated but did not enhance SU rate in our cohort.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12617000914369; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617000914369; Trial was registered on 22 June 2017.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信