使用标准化工具衡量非洲妇女乳房切除术后生活质量:范围审查。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alexis Harerimana, Gugu Mchunu
{"title":"使用标准化工具衡量非洲妇女乳房切除术后生活质量:范围审查。","authors":"Alexis Harerimana, Gugu Mchunu","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03858-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer survivorship is increasingly prevalent, yet quality of life (QoL) outcomes post-mastectomy remain a critical concern in Africa. Women post-mastectomy encounter significant physical, psychological, social, and sexual health challenges that are inadequately addressed in clinical settings. Using standardised tools to measure QoL post-mastectomy of women is imperative. Thus, this scoping review aims to map evidence on the use of standardised tools to measure post-mastectomy quality of life among women in Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the Levac et al. framework. A systematic search-between 2015 and 2025 across Africa-yielded 473 records: 345 from five databases-CINAHL (n = 22), Emcare (n = 55), Medline (n = 65), Scopus (n = 78), and Web of Science (n = 125)-and 128 from other sources. Ultimately, 34 studies met the inclusion criteria for data extraction and thematic analysis. The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 34 studies reviewed involved 5466 participants. Mean ages ranged from 38 to 57 years. QoL post-mastectomy was evaluated using standardised tools such as the EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23, WHOQOL-BREF, BREAST-Q, and FACT-B. Several studies translated and validated QoL assessment tools into local languages, notably Arabic and Yoruba, enhancing contextual relevance. Mastectomy negatively affected overall QoL, body image, psychological wellbeing, sexual functioning, and social relationships. Educational and psychosocial interventions enhanced QoL, particularly those integrating self-compassion training, physical rehabilitation, and group counselling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QoL post-mastectomy among women in Africa is significantly compromised; however, targeted psychosocial and rehabilitation interventions show promise in improving survivorship outcomes. Future research should emphasise culturally sensitive, multidisciplinary programs and adopt longitudinal designs to assess sustained effects on QoL.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>This scoping review emphasises the need for comprehensive post-mastectomy care that includes physical, psychological, sexual, social and financial aspects. Culturally sensitive and accessible interventions are essential for improving the quality of life and long-term outcomes for women in Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of standardised tools to measure post-mastectomy quality of life among women in Africa: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Harerimana, Gugu Mchunu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-025-03858-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer survivorship is increasingly prevalent, yet quality of life (QoL) outcomes post-mastectomy remain a critical concern in Africa. Women post-mastectomy encounter significant physical, psychological, social, and sexual health challenges that are inadequately addressed in clinical settings. Using standardised tools to measure QoL post-mastectomy of women is imperative. Thus, this scoping review aims to map evidence on the use of standardised tools to measure post-mastectomy quality of life among women in Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the Levac et al. framework. A systematic search-between 2015 and 2025 across Africa-yielded 473 records: 345 from five databases-CINAHL (n = 22), Emcare (n = 55), Medline (n = 65), Scopus (n = 78), and Web of Science (n = 125)-and 128 from other sources. Ultimately, 34 studies met the inclusion criteria for data extraction and thematic analysis. The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 34 studies reviewed involved 5466 participants. Mean ages ranged from 38 to 57 years. QoL post-mastectomy was evaluated using standardised tools such as the EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23, WHOQOL-BREF, BREAST-Q, and FACT-B. Several studies translated and validated QoL assessment tools into local languages, notably Arabic and Yoruba, enhancing contextual relevance. Mastectomy negatively affected overall QoL, body image, psychological wellbeing, sexual functioning, and social relationships. Educational and psychosocial interventions enhanced QoL, particularly those integrating self-compassion training, physical rehabilitation, and group counselling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QoL post-mastectomy among women in Africa is significantly compromised; however, targeted psychosocial and rehabilitation interventions show promise in improving survivorship outcomes. Future research should emphasise culturally sensitive, multidisciplinary programs and adopt longitudinal designs to assess sustained effects on QoL.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>This scoping review emphasises the need for comprehensive post-mastectomy care that includes physical, psychological, sexual, social and financial aspects. Culturally sensitive and accessible interventions are essential for improving the quality of life and long-term outcomes for women in Africa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345023/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03858-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03858-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌的生存率越来越普遍,但在非洲,乳房切除术后的生活质量(QoL)仍然是一个关键问题。乳房切除术后的妇女会遇到重大的身体、心理、社会和性健康挑战,这些挑战在临床环境中得不到充分解决。使用标准化的工具来衡量女性乳房切除术后的生活质量是必要的。因此,这项范围审查的目的是绘制关于使用标准化工具来衡量非洲妇女乳房切除术后生活质量的证据。方法:本综述遵循Levac等人的框架。从2015年到2025年在非洲进行的系统搜索产生了473条记录:345条来自五个数据库——cinahl (n = 22)、Emcare (n = 55)、Medline (n = 65)、Scopus (n = 78)和Web of Science (n = 125)——128条来自其他来源。最终,34项研究符合数据提取和专题分析的纳入标准。审查遵循PRISMA-ScR指南。结果:34项研究纳入5466名参与者。平均年龄38 - 57岁。采用标准化工具(如EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23、WHOQOL-BREF、BREAST-Q和FACT-B)评估乳房切除术后的生活质量。一些研究将生活质量评估工具翻译并验证为当地语言,特别是阿拉伯语和约鲁巴语,从而增强了上下文相关性。乳房切除术对总体生活质量、身体形象、心理健康、性功能和社会关系产生负面影响。教育和社会心理干预提高了生活质量,特别是那些结合了自我同情训练、身体康复和团体咨询的干预。结论:非洲妇女乳房切除术后生活质量明显降低;然而,有针对性的社会心理和康复干预显示出改善生存结果的希望。未来的研究应强调文化敏感性、多学科项目,并采用纵向设计来评估对生活质量的持续影响。对癌症幸存者的启示:本综述强调需要全面的乳房切除术后护理,包括身体、心理、性、社会和经济方面。具有文化敏感性和可获得的干预措施对于改善非洲妇女的生活质量和长期成果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of standardised tools to measure post-mastectomy quality of life among women in Africa: a scoping review.

Background: Breast cancer survivorship is increasingly prevalent, yet quality of life (QoL) outcomes post-mastectomy remain a critical concern in Africa. Women post-mastectomy encounter significant physical, psychological, social, and sexual health challenges that are inadequately addressed in clinical settings. Using standardised tools to measure QoL post-mastectomy of women is imperative. Thus, this scoping review aims to map evidence on the use of standardised tools to measure post-mastectomy quality of life among women in Africa.

Methods: This scoping review followed the Levac et al. framework. A systematic search-between 2015 and 2025 across Africa-yielded 473 records: 345 from five databases-CINAHL (n = 22), Emcare (n = 55), Medline (n = 65), Scopus (n = 78), and Web of Science (n = 125)-and 128 from other sources. Ultimately, 34 studies met the inclusion criteria for data extraction and thematic analysis. The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

Results: The 34 studies reviewed involved 5466 participants. Mean ages ranged from 38 to 57 years. QoL post-mastectomy was evaluated using standardised tools such as the EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23, WHOQOL-BREF, BREAST-Q, and FACT-B. Several studies translated and validated QoL assessment tools into local languages, notably Arabic and Yoruba, enhancing contextual relevance. Mastectomy negatively affected overall QoL, body image, psychological wellbeing, sexual functioning, and social relationships. Educational and psychosocial interventions enhanced QoL, particularly those integrating self-compassion training, physical rehabilitation, and group counselling.

Conclusion: QoL post-mastectomy among women in Africa is significantly compromised; however, targeted psychosocial and rehabilitation interventions show promise in improving survivorship outcomes. Future research should emphasise culturally sensitive, multidisciplinary programs and adopt longitudinal designs to assess sustained effects on QoL.

Implications for cancer survivors: This scoping review emphasises the need for comprehensive post-mastectomy care that includes physical, psychological, sexual, social and financial aspects. Culturally sensitive and accessible interventions are essential for improving the quality of life and long-term outcomes for women in Africa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信