与离子迁移谱法交流PFAS鉴定信心的更新指南。

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Anna K. Boatman, Jessie R. Chappel, Kaylie I. Kirkwood-Donelson, Jonathon F. Fleming, David M. Reif, Emma L. Schymanski*, Julia E. Rager* and Erin S. Baker*, 
{"title":"与离子迁移谱法交流PFAS鉴定信心的更新指南。","authors":"Anna K. Boatman,&nbsp;Jessie R. Chappel,&nbsp;Kaylie I. Kirkwood-Donelson,&nbsp;Jonathon F. Fleming,&nbsp;David M. Reif,&nbsp;Emma L. Schymanski*,&nbsp;Julia E. Rager* and Erin S. Baker*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c01354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Over the past decade, global contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has become apparent due to their detection in countless matrices worldwide, from consumer products to human blood to drinking water. As researchers implement nontargeted analyses (NTA) to more fully understand the PFAS present in the environment and human bodies, clear guidance is needed for consistent and objective reporting of the identified molecules. Confidence levels for small molecules analyzed and identified with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) have existed since 2014; however, unification of currently used levels and improved guidance for their application is needed due to inconsistencies in reporting and continuing innovations in analytical methods. Here, we (i) investigate current practices for confidence level reporting of PFAS identified with liquid chromatography (LC), gas chromatography (GC), and/or ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) coupled with HRMS and (ii) propose a simple, unified confidence level guidance that incorporates both PFAS-specific attributes and IMS collision cross section (CCS) values.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 33","pages":"17711–17721"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updated Guidance for Communicating PFAS Identification Confidence with Ion Mobility Spectrometry\",\"authors\":\"Anna K. Boatman,&nbsp;Jessie R. Chappel,&nbsp;Kaylie I. Kirkwood-Donelson,&nbsp;Jonathon F. Fleming,&nbsp;David M. Reif,&nbsp;Emma L. Schymanski*,&nbsp;Julia E. Rager* and Erin S. Baker*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.5c01354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Over the past decade, global contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has become apparent due to their detection in countless matrices worldwide, from consumer products to human blood to drinking water. As researchers implement nontargeted analyses (NTA) to more fully understand the PFAS present in the environment and human bodies, clear guidance is needed for consistent and objective reporting of the identified molecules. Confidence levels for small molecules analyzed and identified with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) have existed since 2014; however, unification of currently used levels and improved guidance for their application is needed due to inconsistencies in reporting and continuing innovations in analytical methods. Here, we (i) investigate current practices for confidence level reporting of PFAS identified with liquid chromatography (LC), gas chromatography (GC), and/or ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) coupled with HRMS and (ii) propose a simple, unified confidence level guidance that incorporates both PFAS-specific attributes and IMS collision cross section (CCS) values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 33\",\"pages\":\"17711–17721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c01354\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c01354","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的全球污染已经变得明显,因为它们在世界各地的无数基质中被检测到,从消费品到人类血液再到饮用水。随着研究人员实施非靶向分析(NTA)以更全面地了解环境和人体中存在的PFAS,需要明确的指导以一致和客观地报告已鉴定的分子。自2014年以来,高分辨率质谱(HRMS)分析和鉴定的小分子置信水平已经存在;但是,由于报告的不一致和分析方法的不断创新,需要统一目前使用的水平并改进其应用的指导。在这里,我们(i)调查了液相色谱(LC)、气相色谱(GC)和/或离子迁移谱(IMS)结合HRMS鉴定PFAS的置信度报告的现行做法,(ii)提出了一个简单、统一的置信度指导,该指导包括PFAS特异性属性和IMS碰撞横截面(CCS)值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Updated Guidance for Communicating PFAS Identification Confidence with Ion Mobility Spectrometry

Updated Guidance for Communicating PFAS Identification Confidence with Ion Mobility Spectrometry

Over the past decade, global contamination from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has become apparent due to their detection in countless matrices worldwide, from consumer products to human blood to drinking water. As researchers implement nontargeted analyses (NTA) to more fully understand the PFAS present in the environment and human bodies, clear guidance is needed for consistent and objective reporting of the identified molecules. Confidence levels for small molecules analyzed and identified with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) have existed since 2014; however, unification of currently used levels and improved guidance for their application is needed due to inconsistencies in reporting and continuing innovations in analytical methods. Here, we (i) investigate current practices for confidence level reporting of PFAS identified with liquid chromatography (LC), gas chromatography (GC), and/or ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) coupled with HRMS and (ii) propose a simple, unified confidence level guidance that incorporates both PFAS-specific attributes and IMS collision cross section (CCS) values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信