优秀的领导者也是绿色领导者吗?既定领导风格与环境领导风格之差异、前因与企业环境响应之预测效度

IF 4.2 2区 哲学 Q2 BUSINESS
Philipp Schäpers, Tabea Guntermann, Henrik Heinemann, Franz W. Mönke
{"title":"优秀的领导者也是绿色领导者吗?既定领导风格与环境领导风格之差异、前因与企业环境响应之预测效度","authors":"Philipp Schäpers,&nbsp;Tabea Guntermann,&nbsp;Henrik Heinemann,&nbsp;Franz W. Mönke","doi":"10.1111/beer.12752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Following an established two-dimensional dichotomy for environmental leadership, environmentally friendly behavior as a leadership style has become an important topic in both research and practice. However, so far, it has remained unclear how these new concepts relate to well-established leadership styles such as transformational leadership, responsible leadership, and leaders' organizational citizenship behavior. In this study, we provide an in-depth examination of the environmentally focused substyles in contrast to their well-established counterparts, their antecedents, and the incremental value in predicting corporate environmental responsiveness (CER). For that purpose, we surveyed <i>N</i> = 211 German leaders: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path model analyses suggest that, overall, established leadership styles and their respective environmentally specific substyle are empirically distinct constructs. Moreover, environmentally specific leadership behaviors explained significant variance beyond established concepts in predicting corporate environmental sustainability. Finally, our analyses suggest that leaders' extraversion and political orientation emerge as valid predictors (i.e., antecedents) of environmental leadership behavior. Overall, this study shows that CER is influenced on an individual level, underlining the important role of leaders' behavior in a rapidly worsening climate crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":29886,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","volume":"34 4","pages":"2034-2047"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/beer.12752","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Good Leaders Also Green Leaders? Differentiating Established and Environmental Leadership Styles, Their Antecedents, and Predictive Validity for Corporate Environmental Responsiveness\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Schäpers,&nbsp;Tabea Guntermann,&nbsp;Henrik Heinemann,&nbsp;Franz W. Mönke\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/beer.12752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Following an established two-dimensional dichotomy for environmental leadership, environmentally friendly behavior as a leadership style has become an important topic in both research and practice. However, so far, it has remained unclear how these new concepts relate to well-established leadership styles such as transformational leadership, responsible leadership, and leaders' organizational citizenship behavior. In this study, we provide an in-depth examination of the environmentally focused substyles in contrast to their well-established counterparts, their antecedents, and the incremental value in predicting corporate environmental responsiveness (CER). For that purpose, we surveyed <i>N</i> = 211 German leaders: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path model analyses suggest that, overall, established leadership styles and their respective environmentally specific substyle are empirically distinct constructs. Moreover, environmentally specific leadership behaviors explained significant variance beyond established concepts in predicting corporate environmental sustainability. Finally, our analyses suggest that leaders' extraversion and political orientation emerge as valid predictors (i.e., antecedents) of environmental leadership behavior. Overall, this study shows that CER is influenced on an individual level, underlining the important role of leaders' behavior in a rapidly worsening climate crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"2034-2047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/beer.12752\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12752\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12752","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境友好型行为作为一种领导风格已经成为研究和实践中的一个重要课题。然而,到目前为止,人们还不清楚这些新概念与变革型领导、责任型领导和领导者的组织公民行为等成熟的领导风格之间的关系。在这项研究中,我们提供了一个深入的研究,以环境为重点的亚风格,对比其完善的对应物,他们的前因式,并在预测企业环境响应(CER)的增量价值。为此,我们调查了N = 211名德国领导人:验证性因素分析(CFA)和路径模型分析表明,总体而言,已建立的领导风格及其各自的环境特定子风格在经验上是不同的结构。此外,环境特定型领导行为在预测企业环境可持续性方面解释了超越既定概念的显著差异。最后,我们的分析表明,领导者的外向性和政治取向是环境领导行为的有效预测因子(即前因)。总体而言,本研究表明,责任责任在个人层面上受到影响,强调了领导人行为在迅速恶化的气候危机中的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Are Good Leaders Also Green Leaders? Differentiating Established and Environmental Leadership Styles, Their Antecedents, and Predictive Validity for Corporate Environmental Responsiveness

Are Good Leaders Also Green Leaders? Differentiating Established and Environmental Leadership Styles, Their Antecedents, and Predictive Validity for Corporate Environmental Responsiveness

Following an established two-dimensional dichotomy for environmental leadership, environmentally friendly behavior as a leadership style has become an important topic in both research and practice. However, so far, it has remained unclear how these new concepts relate to well-established leadership styles such as transformational leadership, responsible leadership, and leaders' organizational citizenship behavior. In this study, we provide an in-depth examination of the environmentally focused substyles in contrast to their well-established counterparts, their antecedents, and the incremental value in predicting corporate environmental responsiveness (CER). For that purpose, we surveyed N = 211 German leaders: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path model analyses suggest that, overall, established leadership styles and their respective environmentally specific substyle are empirically distinct constructs. Moreover, environmentally specific leadership behaviors explained significant variance beyond established concepts in predicting corporate environmental sustainability. Finally, our analyses suggest that leaders' extraversion and political orientation emerge as valid predictors (i.e., antecedents) of environmental leadership behavior. Overall, this study shows that CER is influenced on an individual level, underlining the important role of leaders' behavior in a rapidly worsening climate crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信