英语替代教学部门治理的选择和多样性:对教育公平的影响

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jodie Pennacchia, Mark Axler, Stephanie King, Andrew Clapham
{"title":"英语替代教学部门治理的选择和多样性:对教育公平的影响","authors":"Jodie Pennacchia,&nbsp;Mark Axler,&nbsp;Stephanie King,&nbsp;Andrew Clapham","doi":"10.1002/berj.4161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the continued global prevalence of discourses of educational inclusion, young people across local, national and international contexts continue to be educated outside of mainstream schools. In England, a diverse market of providers—known as alternative provision (AP)—cater for many of these young people. Unlike the mainstream school sector, where diversity of provision has been positioned as a key facilitator of parental choice and improved standards, there is limited evidence on how diversity and choice operate in the AP sector. This paper contributes to addressing this gap by analysing the range of organisations operating under the auspices of AP and their associated governance and regulatory mechanisms. Document analysis of the approved list of AP in a case study local authority demonstrates a diverse set of organisation types and associated governance arrangements, with a common focus on compliance and a lack of accessible publicly available information. We argue that as a result, the most disadvantaged children and families may be underserved in relation to diversity and choice policy imperatives. We conclude by highlighting potential consequences of poorly understood governance in AP for the achievement of equity goals—consequences which are of relevance across international educational contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51410,"journal":{"name":"British Educational Research Journal","volume":"51 4","pages":"1991-2012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/berj.4161","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice and diversity in governance in the English alternative provision sector: Implications for educational equity\",\"authors\":\"Jodie Pennacchia,&nbsp;Mark Axler,&nbsp;Stephanie King,&nbsp;Andrew Clapham\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/berj.4161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite the continued global prevalence of discourses of educational inclusion, young people across local, national and international contexts continue to be educated outside of mainstream schools. In England, a diverse market of providers—known as alternative provision (AP)—cater for many of these young people. Unlike the mainstream school sector, where diversity of provision has been positioned as a key facilitator of parental choice and improved standards, there is limited evidence on how diversity and choice operate in the AP sector. This paper contributes to addressing this gap by analysing the range of organisations operating under the auspices of AP and their associated governance and regulatory mechanisms. Document analysis of the approved list of AP in a case study local authority demonstrates a diverse set of organisation types and associated governance arrangements, with a common focus on compliance and a lack of accessible publicly available information. We argue that as a result, the most disadvantaged children and families may be underserved in relation to diversity and choice policy imperatives. We conclude by highlighting potential consequences of poorly understood governance in AP for the achievement of equity goals—consequences which are of relevance across international educational contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Educational Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"1991-2012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/berj.4161\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Educational Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.4161\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.4161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管教育包容的话语继续在全球流行,但地方、国家和国际背景下的年轻人继续在主流学校之外接受教育。在英国,一个多元化的供应商市场——被称为替代供应(AP)——迎合了这些年轻人中的许多人。与主流学校部门不同,在主流学校部门,提供的多样性被定位为家长选择和提高标准的关键促进因素,关于AP部门的多样性和选择如何运作的证据有限。本文通过分析在美联社支持下运作的组织范围及其相关的治理和监管机制,有助于解决这一差距。在一个案例研究中,对地方当局批准的AP清单的文件分析表明,组织类型和相关治理安排各不相同,共同关注的是合规性和缺乏可公开获取的信息。我们认为,其结果是,最弱势的儿童和家庭在多样性和选择政策方面可能得不到充分的服务。最后,我们强调了对AP治理的不理解对实现公平目标的潜在影响,这些影响与国际教育背景相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Choice and diversity in governance in the English alternative provision sector: Implications for educational equity

Choice and diversity in governance in the English alternative provision sector: Implications for educational equity

Choice and diversity in governance in the English alternative provision sector: Implications for educational equity

Despite the continued global prevalence of discourses of educational inclusion, young people across local, national and international contexts continue to be educated outside of mainstream schools. In England, a diverse market of providers—known as alternative provision (AP)—cater for many of these young people. Unlike the mainstream school sector, where diversity of provision has been positioned as a key facilitator of parental choice and improved standards, there is limited evidence on how diversity and choice operate in the AP sector. This paper contributes to addressing this gap by analysing the range of organisations operating under the auspices of AP and their associated governance and regulatory mechanisms. Document analysis of the approved list of AP in a case study local authority demonstrates a diverse set of organisation types and associated governance arrangements, with a common focus on compliance and a lack of accessible publicly available information. We argue that as a result, the most disadvantaged children and families may be underserved in relation to diversity and choice policy imperatives. We conclude by highlighting potential consequences of poorly understood governance in AP for the achievement of equity goals—consequences which are of relevance across international educational contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Educational Research Journal
British Educational Research Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The British Educational Research Journal is an international peer reviewed medium for the publication of articles of interest to researchers in education and has rapidly become a major focal point for the publication of educational research from throughout the world. For further information on the association please visit the British Educational Research Association web site. The journal is interdisciplinary in approach, and includes reports of case studies, experiments and surveys, discussions of conceptual and methodological issues and of underlying assumptions in educational research, accounts of research in progress, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信