再生LDPE与EPS共混物作为聚丙烯可持续刚性替代品的物理力学特性

IF 3.9
F.S. Hassan , W.U. Eze , R. Umunakwe , T. Oyegoke , M.I. Uzochukwu
{"title":"再生LDPE与EPS共混物作为聚丙烯可持续刚性替代品的物理力学特性","authors":"F.S. Hassan ,&nbsp;W.U. Eze ,&nbsp;R. Umunakwe ,&nbsp;T. Oyegoke ,&nbsp;M.I. Uzochukwu","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The accumulation of plastic waste, particularly low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and expanded polystyrene (EPS or Styrofoam), presents a growing environmental challenge due to their widespread use and limited biodegradability. In resource-constrained regions like Nigeria, uncompatibilized recycling of LDPE/EPS waste offers a low-cost path to valorize plastic pollution. Addressing this issue requires innovative recycling strategies that can transform waste into valuable materials. This study developed an uncompatibilized sustainable polymer blend from post-consumer waste and investigated the physical and mechanical properties of recycled LDPE blended with EPS under resource-constrained conditions as a sustainable rigid alternative to polypropylene (PP) for static applications, though trade-offs in impact resistance were observed. In achieving this, triplicate samples were statistically validated (ANOVA, p &lt; 0.05), LDPE/EPS blends were prepared in varying weight ratios (80/20, 75/25, 70/30, 65/35, and 60/40) using a two-roll mill and compression molding. A series of tests; density, tensile strength, elongation at break, tensile modulus, flexural strength, hardness, and impact resistance; were conducted on triplicate samples, with results expressed as mean ± standard deviation. In the study, the 60/40 blend achieved a tensile modulus of 202 MPa (surpassing PP's 179 MPa) but exhibited 39 % lower impact strength than PP (0.20 vs. 0.33 J/mm²). However, increasing EPS content reduced elongation at break, indicating increased brittleness due to EPS's rigidity, though flexural strength (23.77 MPa) remains 56 % lower than PP (53.59 MPa), restricting load-bearing use. Findings validated suitability for rigid, static applications. Beyond performance, the blend contributes to plastic waste reduction and supports circular economy initiatives by transforming problematic waste materials into functional products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physico-mechanical characterization of recycled LDPE blended with EPS as a sustainable rigid alternative to polypropylene\",\"authors\":\"F.S. Hassan ,&nbsp;W.U. Eze ,&nbsp;R. Umunakwe ,&nbsp;T. Oyegoke ,&nbsp;M.I. Uzochukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The accumulation of plastic waste, particularly low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and expanded polystyrene (EPS or Styrofoam), presents a growing environmental challenge due to their widespread use and limited biodegradability. In resource-constrained regions like Nigeria, uncompatibilized recycling of LDPE/EPS waste offers a low-cost path to valorize plastic pollution. Addressing this issue requires innovative recycling strategies that can transform waste into valuable materials. This study developed an uncompatibilized sustainable polymer blend from post-consumer waste and investigated the physical and mechanical properties of recycled LDPE blended with EPS under resource-constrained conditions as a sustainable rigid alternative to polypropylene (PP) for static applications, though trade-offs in impact resistance were observed. In achieving this, triplicate samples were statistically validated (ANOVA, p &lt; 0.05), LDPE/EPS blends were prepared in varying weight ratios (80/20, 75/25, 70/30, 65/35, and 60/40) using a two-roll mill and compression molding. A series of tests; density, tensile strength, elongation at break, tensile modulus, flexural strength, hardness, and impact resistance; were conducted on triplicate samples, with results expressed as mean ± standard deviation. In the study, the 60/40 blend achieved a tensile modulus of 202 MPa (surpassing PP's 179 MPa) but exhibited 39 % lower impact strength than PP (0.20 vs. 0.33 J/mm²). However, increasing EPS content reduced elongation at break, indicating increased brittleness due to EPS's rigidity, though flexural strength (23.77 MPa) remains 56 % lower than PP (53.59 MPa), restricting load-bearing use. Findings validated suitability for rigid, static applications. Beyond performance, the blend contributes to plastic waste reduction and supports circular economy initiatives by transforming problematic waste materials into functional products.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Waste Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525001812\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912525001812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

塑料废物的积累,特别是低密度聚乙烯(LDPE)和膨胀聚苯乙烯(EPS或聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料),由于其广泛使用和有限的生物降解性,提出了一个日益严峻的环境挑战。在尼日利亚等资源受限的地区,不相容回收LDPE/EPS废物为减少塑料污染提供了一种低成本的途径。解决这个问题需要创新的回收战略,将废物转化为有价值的材料。本研究从消费后废物中开发了一种不相容的可持续聚合物共混物,并研究了在资源有限的条件下,再生LDPE与EPS共混物作为静态应用中聚丙烯(PP)的可持续刚性替代品的物理和机械性能,尽管观察到了抗冲击性的权衡。为了实现这一目标,对三个重复样品进行了统计验证(方差分析,p <; 0.05),使用双辊轧机和压缩成型,以不同的重量比(80/20、75/25、70/30、65/35和60/40)制备了LDPE/EPS共混物。一系列测试;密度、抗拉强度、断裂伸长率、拉伸模量、抗弯强度、硬度、抗冲击性;对三个样本进行分析,结果以均数±标准差表示。在研究中,60/40共混物的拉伸模量为202 MPa(超过PP的179 MPa),但其冲击强度比PP低39 %(0.20比0.33 J/mm²)。然而,EPS含量的增加降低了断裂伸长率,表明由于EPS的刚性而增加了脆性,尽管挠曲强度(23.77 MPa)仍然比PP(53.59 MPa)低56 %,限制了承重使用。结果验证了刚性、静态应用程序的适用性。除了性能之外,这种混合物还有助于减少塑料废物,并通过将有问题的废物转化为功能性产品来支持循环经济倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physico-mechanical characterization of recycled LDPE blended with EPS as a sustainable rigid alternative to polypropylene
The accumulation of plastic waste, particularly low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and expanded polystyrene (EPS or Styrofoam), presents a growing environmental challenge due to their widespread use and limited biodegradability. In resource-constrained regions like Nigeria, uncompatibilized recycling of LDPE/EPS waste offers a low-cost path to valorize plastic pollution. Addressing this issue requires innovative recycling strategies that can transform waste into valuable materials. This study developed an uncompatibilized sustainable polymer blend from post-consumer waste and investigated the physical and mechanical properties of recycled LDPE blended with EPS under resource-constrained conditions as a sustainable rigid alternative to polypropylene (PP) for static applications, though trade-offs in impact resistance were observed. In achieving this, triplicate samples were statistically validated (ANOVA, p < 0.05), LDPE/EPS blends were prepared in varying weight ratios (80/20, 75/25, 70/30, 65/35, and 60/40) using a two-roll mill and compression molding. A series of tests; density, tensile strength, elongation at break, tensile modulus, flexural strength, hardness, and impact resistance; were conducted on triplicate samples, with results expressed as mean ± standard deviation. In the study, the 60/40 blend achieved a tensile modulus of 202 MPa (surpassing PP's 179 MPa) but exhibited 39 % lower impact strength than PP (0.20 vs. 0.33 J/mm²). However, increasing EPS content reduced elongation at break, indicating increased brittleness due to EPS's rigidity, though flexural strength (23.77 MPa) remains 56 % lower than PP (53.59 MPa), restricting load-bearing use. Findings validated suitability for rigid, static applications. Beyond performance, the blend contributes to plastic waste reduction and supports circular economy initiatives by transforming problematic waste materials into functional products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信