研究和出版中的不公平:呼吁公平、多样性和包容性

IF 2.6 0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Divya Bajpai , Eranga Wijewickrama , Urmila Anand , Arpita Ray Chaudhury , Shaifali Sandal
{"title":"研究和出版中的不公平:呼吁公平、多样性和包容性","authors":"Divya Bajpai ,&nbsp;Eranga Wijewickrama ,&nbsp;Urmila Anand ,&nbsp;Arpita Ray Chaudhury ,&nbsp;Shaifali Sandal","doi":"10.1053/j.akdh.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the realm of academic medicine and scientific research, systemic inequities exist both at the participant or patient level and at the level of the researcher. In this paper, we outline sex, gender, geographical, ethnic, and racial inequities in those who participate as subjects in research, which often leads to the exclusion of vulnerable populations. In addition, we highlight inequities in research funding, mentorship, publications, language, career stage, and leadership roles that lead to disparities in who conducts the research or decides on research priorities. We also report algorithmic bias and artificial intelligence as an emerging source of inequities in research. We conclude by proposing strategies to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in research and publication and provide a framework for achieving this when conducting clinical trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72096,"journal":{"name":"Advances in kidney disease and health","volume":"32 3","pages":"Pages 309-317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequities in Research and Publication: A Call for Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion\",\"authors\":\"Divya Bajpai ,&nbsp;Eranga Wijewickrama ,&nbsp;Urmila Anand ,&nbsp;Arpita Ray Chaudhury ,&nbsp;Shaifali Sandal\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.akdh.2025.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the realm of academic medicine and scientific research, systemic inequities exist both at the participant or patient level and at the level of the researcher. In this paper, we outline sex, gender, geographical, ethnic, and racial inequities in those who participate as subjects in research, which often leads to the exclusion of vulnerable populations. In addition, we highlight inequities in research funding, mentorship, publications, language, career stage, and leadership roles that lead to disparities in who conducts the research or decides on research priorities. We also report algorithmic bias and artificial intelligence as an emerging source of inequities in research. We conclude by proposing strategies to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in research and publication and provide a framework for achieving this when conducting clinical trials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in kidney disease and health\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 309-317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in kidney disease and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949813925000503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in kidney disease and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949813925000503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在学术医学和科学研究领域,在参与者或患者层面和研究人员层面都存在系统性的不平等。在本文中,我们概述了作为研究对象参与研究的性别、性别、地理、民族和种族不平等,这往往导致弱势群体被排除在外。此外,我们还强调了研究经费、指导、出版物、语言、职业阶段和领导角色方面的不平等,这些不平等导致了谁进行研究或决定研究重点方面的差异。我们还报告了算法偏见和人工智能作为研究中不公平的新来源。最后,我们提出了促进研究和出版的多样性、公平性和包容性的策略,并提供了在进行临床试验时实现这一目标的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inequities in Research and Publication: A Call for Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
In the realm of academic medicine and scientific research, systemic inequities exist both at the participant or patient level and at the level of the researcher. In this paper, we outline sex, gender, geographical, ethnic, and racial inequities in those who participate as subjects in research, which often leads to the exclusion of vulnerable populations. In addition, we highlight inequities in research funding, mentorship, publications, language, career stage, and leadership roles that lead to disparities in who conducts the research or decides on research priorities. We also report algorithmic bias and artificial intelligence as an emerging source of inequities in research. We conclude by proposing strategies to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in research and publication and provide a framework for achieving this when conducting clinical trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信