改善全球肾脏护理公平获取的政策途径

IF 2.6 0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sri Lekha Tummalapalli , Somkanya Tungsanga , Laura Sola , Ricardo Silvariño , Gangadhar Taduri , M. Rafique Moosa , Ikechi G. Okpechi , Valerie Luyckx
{"title":"改善全球肾脏护理公平获取的政策途径","authors":"Sri Lekha Tummalapalli ,&nbsp;Somkanya Tungsanga ,&nbsp;Laura Sola ,&nbsp;Ricardo Silvariño ,&nbsp;Gangadhar Taduri ,&nbsp;M. Rafique Moosa ,&nbsp;Ikechi G. Okpechi ,&nbsp;Valerie Luyckx","doi":"10.1053/j.akdh.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There are substantial inequities both within and between countries in the availability of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), chronic kidney disease care, and a specialized nephrology workforce. Healthcare policies are the foundation for optimal population health and quality health care. In this article, we present 5 country case studies to illustrate how Thailand, Uruguay, India, South Africa, and the United States have made progress in reducing kidney health inequities through healthcare policy change. Lessons learned from these case studies include the importance of 1) universal KRT coverage, 2) access to care across the spectrum of kidney care, 3) investments in public health and reducing adverse social determinants of health, 4) systematic approaches such as health technology assessments to inform policy decisions given finite resources, and 5) prioritizing noncommunicable diseases. The international community can learn from individual country strategies to close policy gaps relating to kidney disease and create momentum toward improving kidney health for all.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72096,"journal":{"name":"Advances in kidney disease and health","volume":"32 3","pages":"Pages 290-300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy Approaches to Improve Equitable Access Globally to Kidney Care\",\"authors\":\"Sri Lekha Tummalapalli ,&nbsp;Somkanya Tungsanga ,&nbsp;Laura Sola ,&nbsp;Ricardo Silvariño ,&nbsp;Gangadhar Taduri ,&nbsp;M. Rafique Moosa ,&nbsp;Ikechi G. Okpechi ,&nbsp;Valerie Luyckx\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.akdh.2025.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>There are substantial inequities both within and between countries in the availability of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), chronic kidney disease care, and a specialized nephrology workforce. Healthcare policies are the foundation for optimal population health and quality health care. In this article, we present 5 country case studies to illustrate how Thailand, Uruguay, India, South Africa, and the United States have made progress in reducing kidney health inequities through healthcare policy change. Lessons learned from these case studies include the importance of 1) universal KRT coverage, 2) access to care across the spectrum of kidney care, 3) investments in public health and reducing adverse social determinants of health, 4) systematic approaches such as health technology assessments to inform policy decisions given finite resources, and 5) prioritizing noncommunicable diseases. The international community can learn from individual country strategies to close policy gaps relating to kidney disease and create momentum toward improving kidney health for all.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in kidney disease and health\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 290-300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in kidney disease and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949813925000618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in kidney disease and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949813925000618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在肾脏替代疗法(KRT)、慢性肾脏疾病护理和专业肾脏病工作人员的可获得性方面,国家内部和国家之间都存在严重的不平等。卫生保健政策是实现最佳人口健康和高质量卫生保健的基础。在本文中,我们介绍了5个国家的案例研究,以说明泰国、乌拉圭、印度、南非和美国如何通过医疗保健政策的改变在减少肾脏健康不平等方面取得进展。从这些案例研究中吸取的经验教训包括:1)全面覆盖KRT; 2)获得各种肾脏护理;3)对公共卫生的投资和减少健康的不利社会决定因素;4)在资源有限的情况下为决策提供信息的卫生技术评估等系统方法;5)优先考虑非传染性疾病。国际社会可以借鉴个别国家的战略,以缩小与肾脏疾病有关的政策差距,并为改善所有人的肾脏健康创造势头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy Approaches to Improve Equitable Access Globally to Kidney Care
There are substantial inequities both within and between countries in the availability of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), chronic kidney disease care, and a specialized nephrology workforce. Healthcare policies are the foundation for optimal population health and quality health care. In this article, we present 5 country case studies to illustrate how Thailand, Uruguay, India, South Africa, and the United States have made progress in reducing kidney health inequities through healthcare policy change. Lessons learned from these case studies include the importance of 1) universal KRT coverage, 2) access to care across the spectrum of kidney care, 3) investments in public health and reducing adverse social determinants of health, 4) systematic approaches such as health technology assessments to inform policy decisions given finite resources, and 5) prioritizing noncommunicable diseases. The international community can learn from individual country strategies to close policy gaps relating to kidney disease and create momentum toward improving kidney health for all.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信