巴西大西洋雨林环境影响评估中动物群研究的质量:跨时期和项目类型的趋势

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Lucas Silva Azevedo , Inácio Abreu Pestana
{"title":"巴西大西洋雨林环境影响评估中动物群研究的质量:跨时期和项目类型的趋势","authors":"Lucas Silva Azevedo ,&nbsp;Inácio Abreu Pestana","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The installation and operation of infrastructure, mining, landfills, and residential developments have several impacts on fauna, including habitat loss, fragmentation, and disturbance due to noise and light pollution. Therefore, fauna studies are a key component of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) to evaluate the effects on biodiversity. The Atlantic Rainforest is a biodiversity hotspot in Brazil, extending across seventeen states, including Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo. Given the importance of this biome and the impacts of licensing projects on fauna, we aim to assess the quality of fauna studies in EIAs from three study areas under the influence of the Atlantic Rainforest. Four types of projects were selected for evaluation: infrastructure, mining, landfills, and residential development. A quality index was used to assess the fauna study quality. Our results revealed that all evaluated fauna studies had a Quality Index below 70 %, which is considered unsatisfactory. No significant differences in the quality index were found between states or project types, suggesting that the issues with fauna studies are consistent across both states and projects. In São Paulo, however, the recent EIAs (2021−2023) showed a significantly higher Quality Index compared to older EIAs (2012–2014), indicating improvements in fauna studies over time. A positive correlation was observed between the number of pages in fauna studies and the Quality Index, suggesting that comprehensive studies require more detailed documentation. Our findings highlight the need to improve fauna studies by focusing on scientific questions, hypotheses, and conceptual models to make the studies more analytical.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 111430"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of fauna studies in environmental impact assessments in Brazil's Atlantic rainforest: Trends across time periods and project types\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Silva Azevedo ,&nbsp;Inácio Abreu Pestana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The installation and operation of infrastructure, mining, landfills, and residential developments have several impacts on fauna, including habitat loss, fragmentation, and disturbance due to noise and light pollution. Therefore, fauna studies are a key component of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) to evaluate the effects on biodiversity. The Atlantic Rainforest is a biodiversity hotspot in Brazil, extending across seventeen states, including Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo. Given the importance of this biome and the impacts of licensing projects on fauna, we aim to assess the quality of fauna studies in EIAs from three study areas under the influence of the Atlantic Rainforest. Four types of projects were selected for evaluation: infrastructure, mining, landfills, and residential development. A quality index was used to assess the fauna study quality. Our results revealed that all evaluated fauna studies had a Quality Index below 70 %, which is considered unsatisfactory. No significant differences in the quality index were found between states or project types, suggesting that the issues with fauna studies are consistent across both states and projects. In São Paulo, however, the recent EIAs (2021−2023) showed a significantly higher Quality Index compared to older EIAs (2012–2014), indicating improvements in fauna studies over time. A positive correlation was observed between the number of pages in fauna studies and the Quality Index, suggesting that comprehensive studies require more detailed documentation. Our findings highlight the need to improve fauna studies by focusing on scientific questions, hypotheses, and conceptual models to make the studies more analytical.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"volume\":\"311 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725004677\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725004677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基础设施的安装和运行、采矿、垃圾填埋场和住宅开发对动物产生了多种影响,包括栖息地的丧失、破碎化以及噪音和光污染造成的干扰。因此,动物群研究是环境影响评价(EIA)中评价生物多样性影响的重要组成部分。大西洋雨林是巴西生物多样性的热点,横跨17个州,包括帕拉纳、里约热内卢和圣保罗。鉴于这一生物群系的重要性以及许可项目对动物群的影响,我们的目标是评估受大西洋雨林影响的三个研究区域的环境影响评价中动物群研究的质量。选择了四种类型的项目进行评估:基础设施、采矿、垃圾填埋场和住宅开发。采用质量指标评价区系研究质量。我们的结果显示,所有被评估的动物群研究的质量指数都低于70%,这被认为是不满意的。在各州或项目类型之间没有发现质量指数的显著差异,这表明动物研究的问题在各州和项目之间是一致的。然而,在圣保罗州,最近的环境影响评估(2021 - 2023)的质量指数明显高于较早的环境影响评估(2012-2014),这表明随着时间的推移,动物研究有所改善。动物群研究的页数与质量指数之间存在正相关关系,这表明综合研究需要更详细的文献。我们的研究结果强调,需要通过关注科学问题、假设和概念模型来改进动物研究,使研究更具分析性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of fauna studies in environmental impact assessments in Brazil's Atlantic rainforest: Trends across time periods and project types
The installation and operation of infrastructure, mining, landfills, and residential developments have several impacts on fauna, including habitat loss, fragmentation, and disturbance due to noise and light pollution. Therefore, fauna studies are a key component of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) to evaluate the effects on biodiversity. The Atlantic Rainforest is a biodiversity hotspot in Brazil, extending across seventeen states, including Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo. Given the importance of this biome and the impacts of licensing projects on fauna, we aim to assess the quality of fauna studies in EIAs from three study areas under the influence of the Atlantic Rainforest. Four types of projects were selected for evaluation: infrastructure, mining, landfills, and residential development. A quality index was used to assess the fauna study quality. Our results revealed that all evaluated fauna studies had a Quality Index below 70 %, which is considered unsatisfactory. No significant differences in the quality index were found between states or project types, suggesting that the issues with fauna studies are consistent across both states and projects. In São Paulo, however, the recent EIAs (2021−2023) showed a significantly higher Quality Index compared to older EIAs (2012–2014), indicating improvements in fauna studies over time. A positive correlation was observed between the number of pages in fauna studies and the Quality Index, suggesting that comprehensive studies require more detailed documentation. Our findings highlight the need to improve fauna studies by focusing on scientific questions, hypotheses, and conceptual models to make the studies more analytical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信