Saifurahman Zaland , Junjie Wang , Kefei Li , Said Ikram Sadat , Khalid Akhunzada
{"title":"地聚合物作为波特兰水泥的可持续替代品:合成、耐久性、应用、环境影响和成本分析","authors":"Saifurahman Zaland , Junjie Wang , Kefei Li , Said Ikram Sadat , Khalid Akhunzada","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Geopolymers are emerging as a sustainable alternative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC), offering reduced CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, excellent mechanical and durability performance, and the potential to utilize industrial byproducts. Although numerous studies have reviewed the properties of geopolymers, limited attention has been given to their durability, environmental impact, and cost analysis. This paper explores the geopolymerization process and atomic structure of geopolymers. The durability properties, cost, and environmental impacts of geopolymer concrete were comprehensively reviewed and compared with those of OPC concrete. In addition, alternative alkaline activator replacements with commercial alkaline activators have been introduced. The literature indicates that the global warming potential (GWP) of geopolymer concrete is 16 % to 90 % lower than that of OPC concrete. However, geopolymer concrete has some minor drawbacks, including higher costs and other environmental impacts. The results also reveal that using alternative activators can reduce GWP by up to 61 % and the cost of geopolymer concrete by up to 58 % compared to commercially available activators. Finally, future perspectives are outlined to address current challenges and promote the wider adoption of geopolymers in construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"225 ","pages":"Article 116157"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geopolymers as a sustainable alternative to Portland cement: Synthesis, durability, applications, environmental impacts, and cost analysis\",\"authors\":\"Saifurahman Zaland , Junjie Wang , Kefei Li , Said Ikram Sadat , Khalid Akhunzada\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Geopolymers are emerging as a sustainable alternative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC), offering reduced CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, excellent mechanical and durability performance, and the potential to utilize industrial byproducts. Although numerous studies have reviewed the properties of geopolymers, limited attention has been given to their durability, environmental impact, and cost analysis. This paper explores the geopolymerization process and atomic structure of geopolymers. The durability properties, cost, and environmental impacts of geopolymer concrete were comprehensively reviewed and compared with those of OPC concrete. In addition, alternative alkaline activator replacements with commercial alkaline activators have been introduced. The literature indicates that the global warming potential (GWP) of geopolymer concrete is 16 % to 90 % lower than that of OPC concrete. However, geopolymer concrete has some minor drawbacks, including higher costs and other environmental impacts. The results also reveal that using alternative activators can reduce GWP by up to 61 % and the cost of geopolymer concrete by up to 58 % compared to commercially available activators. Finally, future perspectives are outlined to address current challenges and promote the wider adoption of geopolymers in construction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"225 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125008305\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125008305","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Geopolymers as a sustainable alternative to Portland cement: Synthesis, durability, applications, environmental impacts, and cost analysis
Geopolymers are emerging as a sustainable alternative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC), offering reduced CO2 emissions, excellent mechanical and durability performance, and the potential to utilize industrial byproducts. Although numerous studies have reviewed the properties of geopolymers, limited attention has been given to their durability, environmental impact, and cost analysis. This paper explores the geopolymerization process and atomic structure of geopolymers. The durability properties, cost, and environmental impacts of geopolymer concrete were comprehensively reviewed and compared with those of OPC concrete. In addition, alternative alkaline activator replacements with commercial alkaline activators have been introduced. The literature indicates that the global warming potential (GWP) of geopolymer concrete is 16 % to 90 % lower than that of OPC concrete. However, geopolymer concrete has some minor drawbacks, including higher costs and other environmental impacts. The results also reveal that using alternative activators can reduce GWP by up to 61 % and the cost of geopolymer concrete by up to 58 % compared to commercially available activators. Finally, future perspectives are outlined to address current challenges and promote the wider adoption of geopolymers in construction.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.