{"title":"同时发生的双侧M1负极和右小脑负极tDCS减弱了手动视频游戏任务的学习","authors":"Davin Greenwell , Quinn McCallion , Brach Poston , Zachary A. Riley","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bimanual movements require complex cortical interactions when learning new motor skills. Previous work has shown that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) of one or both primary motor cortices can accelerate learning. Given the cerebellum’s role in early motor learning, the present study sought to examine the effect of bilateral primary motor cortex (M1) a-tDCS coupled with cathodal cerebellar tDCS (biM1a + CBc) on learning of a bimanual racing videogame. 40 subjects were enrolled and received either biM1a + CBc (n = 21) or SHAM (n = 19) stimulation for a single practice session. Videogame performance was assessed before and after the practice session, and a follow-up assessment was made 24 h later. Opposite of what was expected, the tDCS stimulation condition resulted in less improvement within a single day of training than the SHAM condition (<em>p =</em> 0.007). Subjects with more gaming experience showed more retention of the training effect between days, regardless of stimulation condition (<em>p</em> = 0.031). These results suggest that the bilateral anodal M1 stimulation paired with cathodal cerebellar stimulation diminishes the rate that online learning occurs for a bimanual racing videogame task. Consistent with many tDCS studies, the electrode montage and current directions are task-specific and cannot be generalized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":"1865 ","pages":"Article 149884"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concurrent bilateral M1 anodal and right cerebellar cathodal tDCS attenuates learning of a bimanual videogame task\",\"authors\":\"Davin Greenwell , Quinn McCallion , Brach Poston , Zachary A. Riley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Bimanual movements require complex cortical interactions when learning new motor skills. Previous work has shown that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) of one or both primary motor cortices can accelerate learning. Given the cerebellum’s role in early motor learning, the present study sought to examine the effect of bilateral primary motor cortex (M1) a-tDCS coupled with cathodal cerebellar tDCS (biM1a + CBc) on learning of a bimanual racing videogame. 40 subjects were enrolled and received either biM1a + CBc (n = 21) or SHAM (n = 19) stimulation for a single practice session. Videogame performance was assessed before and after the practice session, and a follow-up assessment was made 24 h later. Opposite of what was expected, the tDCS stimulation condition resulted in less improvement within a single day of training than the SHAM condition (<em>p =</em> 0.007). Subjects with more gaming experience showed more retention of the training effect between days, regardless of stimulation condition (<em>p</em> = 0.031). These results suggest that the bilateral anodal M1 stimulation paired with cathodal cerebellar stimulation diminishes the rate that online learning occurs for a bimanual racing videogame task. Consistent with many tDCS studies, the electrode montage and current directions are task-specific and cannot be generalized.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"1865 \",\"pages\":\"Article 149884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899325004470\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899325004470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Concurrent bilateral M1 anodal and right cerebellar cathodal tDCS attenuates learning of a bimanual videogame task
Bimanual movements require complex cortical interactions when learning new motor skills. Previous work has shown that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) of one or both primary motor cortices can accelerate learning. Given the cerebellum’s role in early motor learning, the present study sought to examine the effect of bilateral primary motor cortex (M1) a-tDCS coupled with cathodal cerebellar tDCS (biM1a + CBc) on learning of a bimanual racing videogame. 40 subjects were enrolled and received either biM1a + CBc (n = 21) or SHAM (n = 19) stimulation for a single practice session. Videogame performance was assessed before and after the practice session, and a follow-up assessment was made 24 h later. Opposite of what was expected, the tDCS stimulation condition resulted in less improvement within a single day of training than the SHAM condition (p = 0.007). Subjects with more gaming experience showed more retention of the training effect between days, regardless of stimulation condition (p = 0.031). These results suggest that the bilateral anodal M1 stimulation paired with cathodal cerebellar stimulation diminishes the rate that online learning occurs for a bimanual racing videogame task. Consistent with many tDCS studies, the electrode montage and current directions are task-specific and cannot be generalized.
期刊介绍:
An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences.
Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed.
With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.