{"title":"重新审视人工智能与可持续发展目标的关系:关键反思和未来方向","authors":"Osama Nasir , Rana Tallal Javed , Shivam Gupta , Ricardo Vinuesa , Junaid Qadir","doi":"10.1016/j.socimp.2025.100142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This short commentary builds on our previous work (Nasir et al., 2023), which introduced a four-vantage-point framework—economic, social, environmental, and ethical—for analyzing how Artificial Intelligence (AI) aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In that study, we used a mixed-methods, data-driven approach to assess alignment across five key document sets, revealing an overrepresentation of economic goals (e.g., SDG 9) and underrepresentation of equity, ecological, and governance-related goals. In this commentary, we reflect on those findings and situate them within wider debates on sustainable AI, drawing on systems theory, critical complexity, and normative critiques of technocratic paradigms (i.e., expert-driven systems). Rather than treating AI as a purely technical driver of progress, we highlight its dependence on institutional values, governance structures, and embedded worldviews. We argue for a paradigm-aware, ethically grounded reimagining of AI development—one that embraces pluralism, justice, and care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101167,"journal":{"name":"Societal Impacts","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The AI–SDG nexus revisited: Critical reflections and future directions\",\"authors\":\"Osama Nasir , Rana Tallal Javed , Shivam Gupta , Ricardo Vinuesa , Junaid Qadir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socimp.2025.100142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This short commentary builds on our previous work (Nasir et al., 2023), which introduced a four-vantage-point framework—economic, social, environmental, and ethical—for analyzing how Artificial Intelligence (AI) aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In that study, we used a mixed-methods, data-driven approach to assess alignment across five key document sets, revealing an overrepresentation of economic goals (e.g., SDG 9) and underrepresentation of equity, ecological, and governance-related goals. In this commentary, we reflect on those findings and situate them within wider debates on sustainable AI, drawing on systems theory, critical complexity, and normative critiques of technocratic paradigms (i.e., expert-driven systems). Rather than treating AI as a purely technical driver of progress, we highlight its dependence on institutional values, governance structures, and embedded worldviews. We argue for a paradigm-aware, ethically grounded reimagining of AI development—one that embraces pluralism, justice, and care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Societal Impacts\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Societal Impacts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949697725000414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949697725000414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇简短的评论建立在我们之前的工作(Nasir et al., 2023)的基础上,该工作介绍了一个四个优势框架——经济、社会、环境和道德——用于分析人工智能(AI)如何与联合国可持续发展目标(sdg)保持一致。在该研究中,我们使用了混合方法,数据驱动的方法来评估五个关键文件集的一致性,揭示了经济目标(例如可持续发展目标9)的过度代表性和公平,生态和治理相关目标的代表性不足。在这篇评论中,我们反思了这些发现,并将它们置于关于可持续人工智能的更广泛辩论中,利用系统理论、关键复杂性和对技术官僚范式(即专家驱动系统)的规范性批评。我们不是将人工智能视为纯粹的技术进步驱动力,而是强调它对制度价值观、治理结构和内在世界观的依赖。我们主张对人工智能发展进行一种范式意识的、基于伦理的重新构想——一种包含多元主义、正义和关怀的重新构想。
The AI–SDG nexus revisited: Critical reflections and future directions
This short commentary builds on our previous work (Nasir et al., 2023), which introduced a four-vantage-point framework—economic, social, environmental, and ethical—for analyzing how Artificial Intelligence (AI) aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In that study, we used a mixed-methods, data-driven approach to assess alignment across five key document sets, revealing an overrepresentation of economic goals (e.g., SDG 9) and underrepresentation of equity, ecological, and governance-related goals. In this commentary, we reflect on those findings and situate them within wider debates on sustainable AI, drawing on systems theory, critical complexity, and normative critiques of technocratic paradigms (i.e., expert-driven systems). Rather than treating AI as a purely technical driver of progress, we highlight its dependence on institutional values, governance structures, and embedded worldviews. We argue for a paradigm-aware, ethically grounded reimagining of AI development—one that embraces pluralism, justice, and care.