在使用热加湿器和热湿交换器的机械通风中,儿科患者的抗生素耐药性和细菌接触

Pablo Mattos Navarro , Rosaura Caron Estrada
{"title":"在使用热加湿器和热湿交换器的机械通风中,儿科患者的抗生素耐药性和细菌接触","authors":"Pablo Mattos Navarro ,&nbsp;Rosaura Caron Estrada","doi":"10.1016/j.acci.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Invasive mechanical ventilation is essential for children with severe respiratory failure but increases the risk of infections due to exposure to pathogenic microorganisms. There are 2<!--> <!-->main humidification technologies: heated humidifiers and heat and moisture exchangers. Although some studies suggest that the latter may reduce respiratory infections, the results are inconclusive, especially in children and infants.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate bacterial exposure and antibiotic resistance profile in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients using heated humidifiers and heat and moisture exchangers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Descriptive cross-sectional study between 2016 to 2023, of 1920 endotracheal cultures taken after 48<!--> <!-->hours of intubation in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients and classified according to the type of humidifier. The frequency and resistance profile of the identified bacteria were determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The percentage of positivity and the most frequently identified bacterial species were the same in both groups. The strains from heated humidifiers showed greater antibiotic resistance, 56% of which presented only 1 or 2 therapeutic options, compared to 28% in the group of heat and humidity exchangers. In addition, 50% of the strains in the heat and humidity exchangers had 4 or more therapeutic options, compared to 39% in the heat exchanger group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>No significant differences in bacterial exposure were found between the 2<!--> <!-->technologies. However, heated humidifier strains showed higher antibiotic resistance, suggesting a higher potential risk of infections with limited therapeutic options.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100016,"journal":{"name":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages 486-494"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resistencia antibiótica y exposición bacteriana de pacientes pediátricos en ventilación mecánica con humidificadores térmicos e intercambiadores de calor y humedad\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Mattos Navarro ,&nbsp;Rosaura Caron Estrada\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acci.2025.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Invasive mechanical ventilation is essential for children with severe respiratory failure but increases the risk of infections due to exposure to pathogenic microorganisms. There are 2<!--> <!-->main humidification technologies: heated humidifiers and heat and moisture exchangers. Although some studies suggest that the latter may reduce respiratory infections, the results are inconclusive, especially in children and infants.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate bacterial exposure and antibiotic resistance profile in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients using heated humidifiers and heat and moisture exchangers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Descriptive cross-sectional study between 2016 to 2023, of 1920 endotracheal cultures taken after 48<!--> <!-->hours of intubation in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients and classified according to the type of humidifier. The frequency and resistance profile of the identified bacteria were determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The percentage of positivity and the most frequently identified bacterial species were the same in both groups. The strains from heated humidifiers showed greater antibiotic resistance, 56% of which presented only 1 or 2 therapeutic options, compared to 28% in the group of heat and humidity exchangers. In addition, 50% of the strains in the heat and humidity exchangers had 4 or more therapeutic options, compared to 39% in the heat exchanger group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>No significant differences in bacterial exposure were found between the 2<!--> <!-->technologies. However, heated humidifier strains showed higher antibiotic resistance, suggesting a higher potential risk of infections with limited therapeutic options.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 486-494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0122726225000357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0122726225000357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有创机械通气对于严重呼吸衰竭的儿童至关重要,但由于暴露于病原微生物而增加感染的风险。主要有两种加湿技术:加热式加湿器和热交换器。尽管一些研究表明后者可能减少呼吸道感染,但结果尚无定论,特别是在儿童和婴儿中。目的评价儿童机械通气患者使用加热加湿器和热湿交换器时的细菌暴露和抗生素耐药性。方法对2016 - 2023年间1920例机械通气患儿插管48小时后气管培养进行描述性横断面研究,并按加湿器类型进行分类。测定所鉴定细菌的频率和耐药谱。结果两组的阳性检出率和最常检出的细菌种类相同。加热加湿器组的菌株显示出更大的抗生素耐药性,56%的菌株只提供1或2种治疗方案,而热湿交换器组的这一比例为28%。此外,在热交换器组中,50%的菌株有4种或更多的治疗选择,而在热交换器组中,这一比例为39%。结论两种工艺的细菌暴露量无显著差异。然而,加热加湿器菌株显示出更高的抗生素耐药性,这表明在有限的治疗选择下感染的潜在风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resistencia antibiótica y exposición bacteriana de pacientes pediátricos en ventilación mecánica con humidificadores térmicos e intercambiadores de calor y humedad

Introduction

Invasive mechanical ventilation is essential for children with severe respiratory failure but increases the risk of infections due to exposure to pathogenic microorganisms. There are 2 main humidification technologies: heated humidifiers and heat and moisture exchangers. Although some studies suggest that the latter may reduce respiratory infections, the results are inconclusive, especially in children and infants.

Objective

To evaluate bacterial exposure and antibiotic resistance profile in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients using heated humidifiers and heat and moisture exchangers.

Methods

Descriptive cross-sectional study between 2016 to 2023, of 1920 endotracheal cultures taken after 48 hours of intubation in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients and classified according to the type of humidifier. The frequency and resistance profile of the identified bacteria were determined.

Results

The percentage of positivity and the most frequently identified bacterial species were the same in both groups. The strains from heated humidifiers showed greater antibiotic resistance, 56% of which presented only 1 or 2 therapeutic options, compared to 28% in the group of heat and humidity exchangers. In addition, 50% of the strains in the heat and humidity exchangers had 4 or more therapeutic options, compared to 39% in the heat exchanger group.

Conclusions

No significant differences in bacterial exposure were found between the 2 technologies. However, heated humidifier strains showed higher antibiotic resistance, suggesting a higher potential risk of infections with limited therapeutic options.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信