{"title":"社会成本在提高能源平准化成本中的作用","authors":"Isabel Robalo-Cabrera , Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso , Alfredo Alcayde , Laura Castro-Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global share of renewable energy exceeds 30 % as of 2023, marking a milestone in the energy transition. In response, many governments have adopted more ambitious targets for renewable energy generation to limit global warming below 1.5 °C or, at most, 2 °C, as outlined in the Paris Agreement. To accelerate the deployment of renewable technologies, investors, developers, and policymakers rely on tools to evaluate the economic competitiveness of different technological alternatives. The most commonly used metric is the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), primarily due to its simplicity. However, LCOE falls short in the current context, as it excludes costs associated with high renewable penetration, as well as environmental and social impacts. Alternative metrics such as LACE, COVE, sLCOE and SCOE attempt to address these shortcomings. Nevertheless, they are not as widely adopted and do not yet serve as fully viable replacements for LCOE. Our aim is to define a path toward a metric that addresses LCOE's limitations by incorporating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy) and SDG 13 (climate action), while preserving the simplicity that enables widespread use. We conclude that, although emerging metrics partially resolve LCOE's limitations to varying degrees of complexity, they do not offer a comprehensive solution within the current regulatory framework. This highlights the need to integrate existing approaches and develop a decision-making tool that explicitly includes social costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104268"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of social costs in enhancing the levelized cost of energy\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Robalo-Cabrera , Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso , Alfredo Alcayde , Laura Castro-Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The global share of renewable energy exceeds 30 % as of 2023, marking a milestone in the energy transition. In response, many governments have adopted more ambitious targets for renewable energy generation to limit global warming below 1.5 °C or, at most, 2 °C, as outlined in the Paris Agreement. To accelerate the deployment of renewable technologies, investors, developers, and policymakers rely on tools to evaluate the economic competitiveness of different technological alternatives. The most commonly used metric is the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), primarily due to its simplicity. However, LCOE falls short in the current context, as it excludes costs associated with high renewable penetration, as well as environmental and social impacts. Alternative metrics such as LACE, COVE, sLCOE and SCOE attempt to address these shortcomings. Nevertheless, they are not as widely adopted and do not yet serve as fully viable replacements for LCOE. Our aim is to define a path toward a metric that addresses LCOE's limitations by incorporating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy) and SDG 13 (climate action), while preserving the simplicity that enables widespread use. We conclude that, although emerging metrics partially resolve LCOE's limitations to varying degrees of complexity, they do not offer a comprehensive solution within the current regulatory framework. This highlights the need to integrate existing approaches and develop a decision-making tool that explicitly includes social costs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003494\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of social costs in enhancing the levelized cost of energy
The global share of renewable energy exceeds 30 % as of 2023, marking a milestone in the energy transition. In response, many governments have adopted more ambitious targets for renewable energy generation to limit global warming below 1.5 °C or, at most, 2 °C, as outlined in the Paris Agreement. To accelerate the deployment of renewable technologies, investors, developers, and policymakers rely on tools to evaluate the economic competitiveness of different technological alternatives. The most commonly used metric is the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), primarily due to its simplicity. However, LCOE falls short in the current context, as it excludes costs associated with high renewable penetration, as well as environmental and social impacts. Alternative metrics such as LACE, COVE, sLCOE and SCOE attempt to address these shortcomings. Nevertheless, they are not as widely adopted and do not yet serve as fully viable replacements for LCOE. Our aim is to define a path toward a metric that addresses LCOE's limitations by incorporating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy) and SDG 13 (climate action), while preserving the simplicity that enables widespread use. We conclude that, although emerging metrics partially resolve LCOE's limitations to varying degrees of complexity, they do not offer a comprehensive solution within the current regulatory framework. This highlights the need to integrate existing approaches and develop a decision-making tool that explicitly includes social costs.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.