社会成本在提高能源平准化成本中的作用

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Isabel Robalo-Cabrera , Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso , Alfredo Alcayde , Laura Castro-Santos
{"title":"社会成本在提高能源平准化成本中的作用","authors":"Isabel Robalo-Cabrera ,&nbsp;Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso ,&nbsp;Alfredo Alcayde ,&nbsp;Laura Castro-Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global share of renewable energy exceeds 30 % as of 2023, marking a milestone in the energy transition. In response, many governments have adopted more ambitious targets for renewable energy generation to limit global warming below 1.5 °C or, at most, 2 °C, as outlined in the Paris Agreement. To accelerate the deployment of renewable technologies, investors, developers, and policymakers rely on tools to evaluate the economic competitiveness of different technological alternatives. The most commonly used metric is the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), primarily due to its simplicity. However, LCOE falls short in the current context, as it excludes costs associated with high renewable penetration, as well as environmental and social impacts. Alternative metrics such as LACE, COVE, sLCOE and SCOE attempt to address these shortcomings. Nevertheless, they are not as widely adopted and do not yet serve as fully viable replacements for LCOE. Our aim is to define a path toward a metric that addresses LCOE's limitations by incorporating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy) and SDG 13 (climate action), while preserving the simplicity that enables widespread use. We conclude that, although emerging metrics partially resolve LCOE's limitations to varying degrees of complexity, they do not offer a comprehensive solution within the current regulatory framework. This highlights the need to integrate existing approaches and develop a decision-making tool that explicitly includes social costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104268"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of social costs in enhancing the levelized cost of energy\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Robalo-Cabrera ,&nbsp;Almudena Filgueira-Vizoso ,&nbsp;Alfredo Alcayde ,&nbsp;Laura Castro-Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The global share of renewable energy exceeds 30 % as of 2023, marking a milestone in the energy transition. In response, many governments have adopted more ambitious targets for renewable energy generation to limit global warming below 1.5 °C or, at most, 2 °C, as outlined in the Paris Agreement. To accelerate the deployment of renewable technologies, investors, developers, and policymakers rely on tools to evaluate the economic competitiveness of different technological alternatives. The most commonly used metric is the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), primarily due to its simplicity. However, LCOE falls short in the current context, as it excludes costs associated with high renewable penetration, as well as environmental and social impacts. Alternative metrics such as LACE, COVE, sLCOE and SCOE attempt to address these shortcomings. Nevertheless, they are not as widely adopted and do not yet serve as fully viable replacements for LCOE. Our aim is to define a path toward a metric that addresses LCOE's limitations by incorporating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy) and SDG 13 (climate action), while preserving the simplicity that enables widespread use. We conclude that, although emerging metrics partially resolve LCOE's limitations to varying degrees of complexity, they do not offer a comprehensive solution within the current regulatory framework. This highlights the need to integrate existing approaches and develop a decision-making tool that explicitly includes social costs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003494\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

到2023年,全球可再生能源份额将超过30%,这是能源转型的一个里程碑。作为回应,许多政府采取了更加雄心勃勃的可再生能源发电目标,将全球变暖限制在1.5°C以下,或最多2°C,如《巴黎协定》所述。为了加快可再生能源技术的部署,投资者、开发商和政策制定者依靠各种工具来评估不同技术替代方案的经济竞争力。最常用的度量是平准化能源成本(LCOE),主要是因为它的简单性。然而,在当前背景下,LCOE存在不足,因为它不包括与高可再生能源渗透以及环境和社会影响相关的成本。诸如LACE、COVE、sLCOE和SCOE等替代度量试图解决这些缺点。然而,它们没有被广泛采用,也还不能完全替代LCOE。我们的目标是通过纳入可持续发展目标(SDG),特别是可持续发展目标7(负担得起的清洁能源)和可持续发展目标13(气候行动),确定一条解决LCOE局限性的指标之路,同时保持其简单性,以便广泛使用。我们得出的结论是,尽管新兴指标部分解决了LCOE在不同程度上的复杂性限制,但它们并没有在当前的监管框架内提供全面的解决方案。这突出表明有必要综合现有办法,并开发一种明确包括社会成本的决策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of social costs in enhancing the levelized cost of energy
The global share of renewable energy exceeds 30 % as of 2023, marking a milestone in the energy transition. In response, many governments have adopted more ambitious targets for renewable energy generation to limit global warming below 1.5 °C or, at most, 2 °C, as outlined in the Paris Agreement. To accelerate the deployment of renewable technologies, investors, developers, and policymakers rely on tools to evaluate the economic competitiveness of different technological alternatives. The most commonly used metric is the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE), primarily due to its simplicity. However, LCOE falls short in the current context, as it excludes costs associated with high renewable penetration, as well as environmental and social impacts. Alternative metrics such as LACE, COVE, sLCOE and SCOE attempt to address these shortcomings. Nevertheless, they are not as widely adopted and do not yet serve as fully viable replacements for LCOE. Our aim is to define a path toward a metric that addresses LCOE's limitations by incorporating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy) and SDG 13 (climate action), while preserving the simplicity that enables widespread use. We conclude that, although emerging metrics partially resolve LCOE's limitations to varying degrees of complexity, they do not offer a comprehensive solution within the current regulatory framework. This highlights the need to integrate existing approaches and develop a decision-making tool that explicitly includes social costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信