{"title":"地震液化危险性一致性设计与评价设计因素的发展","authors":"A. Wei , C. Feng , H.P. Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seismic-induced liquefaction can cause damage to structures and infrastructure systems. The design checking equation for assessing the liquefaction potential is based on the results from the cone penetration test or the standard penetration test (SPT). Chinese design codes for assessing the liquefaction potential are based on SPT results, and the critical SPT blow count is evaluated based on the specified return period value of the peak ground acceleration (PGA), <em>a</em><sub><em>T</em></sub>. However, using <em>a</em><sub><em>T</em></sub> alone to assess the liquefaction potential may not achieve a consistent annual probability of liquefaction triggering, <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub>, because seismic events with different combinations of PGA and earthquake magnitude contribute to <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub>. To overcome this drawback, the present study conducted probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis (PLHA) to calibrate the adjustment or design factors for designing or checking the liquefaction potential. The calibration considered the tolerable annual failure probabilities and detailed seismicity information applicable to the Chinese mainland. It focused on 31 major Chinese cities and different combinations of the groundwater depth, saturated sandy/silty layer embedment depth, and soil properties. Using the calibrated design factors for the considered combinations, empirical equations for evaluating the design factors were developed for practical use. It was shown that without considering such calibrated design factors in evaluating liquefaction potential, the <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub> obtained can vary substantially, and the use of the calibrated design factors reduces such variability. The effects of using the safety factor for designing or checking the liquefaction potential on the implied <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub> were also evaluated and presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 109715"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of design factors for seismic liquefaction hazard-consistent design and evaluation\",\"authors\":\"A. Wei , C. Feng , H.P. Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Seismic-induced liquefaction can cause damage to structures and infrastructure systems. The design checking equation for assessing the liquefaction potential is based on the results from the cone penetration test or the standard penetration test (SPT). Chinese design codes for assessing the liquefaction potential are based on SPT results, and the critical SPT blow count is evaluated based on the specified return period value of the peak ground acceleration (PGA), <em>a</em><sub><em>T</em></sub>. However, using <em>a</em><sub><em>T</em></sub> alone to assess the liquefaction potential may not achieve a consistent annual probability of liquefaction triggering, <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub>, because seismic events with different combinations of PGA and earthquake magnitude contribute to <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub>. To overcome this drawback, the present study conducted probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis (PLHA) to calibrate the adjustment or design factors for designing or checking the liquefaction potential. The calibration considered the tolerable annual failure probabilities and detailed seismicity information applicable to the Chinese mainland. It focused on 31 major Chinese cities and different combinations of the groundwater depth, saturated sandy/silty layer embedment depth, and soil properties. Using the calibrated design factors for the considered combinations, empirical equations for evaluating the design factors were developed for practical use. It was shown that without considering such calibrated design factors in evaluating liquefaction potential, the <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub> obtained can vary substantially, and the use of the calibrated design factors reduces such variability. The effects of using the safety factor for designing or checking the liquefaction potential on the implied <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub> were also evaluated and presented.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109715\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125005081\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125005081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of design factors for seismic liquefaction hazard-consistent design and evaluation
Seismic-induced liquefaction can cause damage to structures and infrastructure systems. The design checking equation for assessing the liquefaction potential is based on the results from the cone penetration test or the standard penetration test (SPT). Chinese design codes for assessing the liquefaction potential are based on SPT results, and the critical SPT blow count is evaluated based on the specified return period value of the peak ground acceleration (PGA), aT. However, using aT alone to assess the liquefaction potential may not achieve a consistent annual probability of liquefaction triggering, PAL, because seismic events with different combinations of PGA and earthquake magnitude contribute to PAL. To overcome this drawback, the present study conducted probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis (PLHA) to calibrate the adjustment or design factors for designing or checking the liquefaction potential. The calibration considered the tolerable annual failure probabilities and detailed seismicity information applicable to the Chinese mainland. It focused on 31 major Chinese cities and different combinations of the groundwater depth, saturated sandy/silty layer embedment depth, and soil properties. Using the calibrated design factors for the considered combinations, empirical equations for evaluating the design factors were developed for practical use. It was shown that without considering such calibrated design factors in evaluating liquefaction potential, the PAL obtained can vary substantially, and the use of the calibrated design factors reduces such variability. The effects of using the safety factor for designing or checking the liquefaction potential on the implied PAL were also evaluated and presented.
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering.
Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.