地震液化危险性一致性设计与评价设计因素的发展

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
A. Wei , C. Feng , H.P. Hong
{"title":"地震液化危险性一致性设计与评价设计因素的发展","authors":"A. Wei ,&nbsp;C. Feng ,&nbsp;H.P. Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seismic-induced liquefaction can cause damage to structures and infrastructure systems. The design checking equation for assessing the liquefaction potential is based on the results from the cone penetration test or the standard penetration test (SPT). Chinese design codes for assessing the liquefaction potential are based on SPT results, and the critical SPT blow count is evaluated based on the specified return period value of the peak ground acceleration (PGA), <em>a</em><sub><em>T</em></sub>. However, using <em>a</em><sub><em>T</em></sub> alone to assess the liquefaction potential may not achieve a consistent annual probability of liquefaction triggering, <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub>, because seismic events with different combinations of PGA and earthquake magnitude contribute to <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub>. To overcome this drawback, the present study conducted probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis (PLHA) to calibrate the adjustment or design factors for designing or checking the liquefaction potential. The calibration considered the tolerable annual failure probabilities and detailed seismicity information applicable to the Chinese mainland. It focused on 31 major Chinese cities and different combinations of the groundwater depth, saturated sandy/silty layer embedment depth, and soil properties. Using the calibrated design factors for the considered combinations, empirical equations for evaluating the design factors were developed for practical use. It was shown that without considering such calibrated design factors in evaluating liquefaction potential, the <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub> obtained can vary substantially, and the use of the calibrated design factors reduces such variability. The effects of using the safety factor for designing or checking the liquefaction potential on the implied <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub> were also evaluated and presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 109715"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of design factors for seismic liquefaction hazard-consistent design and evaluation\",\"authors\":\"A. Wei ,&nbsp;C. Feng ,&nbsp;H.P. Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Seismic-induced liquefaction can cause damage to structures and infrastructure systems. The design checking equation for assessing the liquefaction potential is based on the results from the cone penetration test or the standard penetration test (SPT). Chinese design codes for assessing the liquefaction potential are based on SPT results, and the critical SPT blow count is evaluated based on the specified return period value of the peak ground acceleration (PGA), <em>a</em><sub><em>T</em></sub>. However, using <em>a</em><sub><em>T</em></sub> alone to assess the liquefaction potential may not achieve a consistent annual probability of liquefaction triggering, <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub>, because seismic events with different combinations of PGA and earthquake magnitude contribute to <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub>. To overcome this drawback, the present study conducted probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis (PLHA) to calibrate the adjustment or design factors for designing or checking the liquefaction potential. The calibration considered the tolerable annual failure probabilities and detailed seismicity information applicable to the Chinese mainland. It focused on 31 major Chinese cities and different combinations of the groundwater depth, saturated sandy/silty layer embedment depth, and soil properties. Using the calibrated design factors for the considered combinations, empirical equations for evaluating the design factors were developed for practical use. It was shown that without considering such calibrated design factors in evaluating liquefaction potential, the <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub> obtained can vary substantially, and the use of the calibrated design factors reduces such variability. The effects of using the safety factor for designing or checking the liquefaction potential on the implied <em>P</em><sub><em>AL</em></sub> were also evaluated and presented.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109715\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125005081\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125005081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地震引起的液化会对建筑物和基础设施系统造成破坏。评估液化潜力的设计验算方程是基于锥形贯入试验或标准贯入试验(SPT)的结果。中国的液化潜力评估设计规范是基于SPT结果,而临界SPT吹数是基于峰值地面加速度(PGA) aT的指定返回周期值来评估的。然而,单独使用aT来评估液化潜力可能无法获得一致的年度液化触发概率PAL,因为不同PGA和地震震级组合的地震事件会导致PAL。为了克服这一缺点,本研究进行了概率液化危害分析(PLHA),以校准液化潜力设计或检查的调整或设计因素。校正考虑了适用于中国大陆的容许年失效概率和详细的地震活动资料。该研究以中国31个主要城市为研究对象,研究了地下水深度、饱和砂质/粉质层埋深和土壤性质的不同组合。利用对考虑的组合的校准设计因子,开发了用于实际使用的评估设计因子的经验方程。结果表明,在评估液化潜力时不考虑这些校准的设计因素,得到的PAL可能会有很大的变化,而校准设计因素的使用减少了这种可变性。并评价和介绍了利用安全系数设计或校核液化势对隐含PAL的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of design factors for seismic liquefaction hazard-consistent design and evaluation
Seismic-induced liquefaction can cause damage to structures and infrastructure systems. The design checking equation for assessing the liquefaction potential is based on the results from the cone penetration test or the standard penetration test (SPT). Chinese design codes for assessing the liquefaction potential are based on SPT results, and the critical SPT blow count is evaluated based on the specified return period value of the peak ground acceleration (PGA), aT. However, using aT alone to assess the liquefaction potential may not achieve a consistent annual probability of liquefaction triggering, PAL, because seismic events with different combinations of PGA and earthquake magnitude contribute to PAL. To overcome this drawback, the present study conducted probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis (PLHA) to calibrate the adjustment or design factors for designing or checking the liquefaction potential. The calibration considered the tolerable annual failure probabilities and detailed seismicity information applicable to the Chinese mainland. It focused on 31 major Chinese cities and different combinations of the groundwater depth, saturated sandy/silty layer embedment depth, and soil properties. Using the calibrated design factors for the considered combinations, empirical equations for evaluating the design factors were developed for practical use. It was shown that without considering such calibrated design factors in evaluating liquefaction potential, the PAL obtained can vary substantially, and the use of the calibrated design factors reduces such variability. The effects of using the safety factor for designing or checking the liquefaction potential on the implied PAL were also evaluated and presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信