双级膜重整器甲醇蒸汽重整强化制氢的实验研究

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Keshav Kumar , Sachin Kumar Vishwakarma , Amit Kumar , Sweta Sharma , Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay
{"title":"双级膜重整器甲醇蒸汽重整强化制氢的实验研究","authors":"Keshav Kumar ,&nbsp;Sachin Kumar Vishwakarma ,&nbsp;Amit Kumar ,&nbsp;Sweta Sharma ,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay","doi":"10.1016/j.joei.2025.102236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Methanol steam reforming (MSR) provides an effective option for on-site hydrogen generation through a membrane reformer (MR) equipped with the Pd-based membrane for H<sub>2</sub> separation from the mixture gas produced during MSR. However, a major obstacle toward scale-up and commercialization is the restricted mass and heat transfer across the catalyst bed. Additionally, a substantial quantity of hydrogen is emitted in the retentate that goes unrecovered. Therefore, in the present study, we have used the structured SiC foam coated with Cu-Fe/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Zn-ZrO<sub>2</sub> (AZZ, Cu-Fe = 50:50 mol ratio, and AZZ = 70:15:12) catalyst to intensify the radial heat and mass transfer inside the reactor. Further, a multi-pass membrane separator (MPMS) is introduced on the retentate side of the MR to recover the leftover hydrogen, the integrated system is termed as a double-stage membrane reformer (DSMR), functioning as a standalone H<sub>2</sub> production and separation module, to effectively separate the unrecovered H<sub>2</sub> from the retentate stream of the MR. The performance of the DSMR was optimized at different temperatures (573–673 K), pressures (100–300 kPaG), weight hourly space velocity (WHSV, 12.23 to 48.92 <span><math><mrow><msub><mtext>kg</mtext><mtext>feed</mtext></msub><msup><mrow><mspace></mspace><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>‐</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><msubsup><mrow><mspace></mspace><mtext>kg</mtext></mrow><mtext>catalyst</mtext><mrow><mo>‐</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></span>), and varying membrane areas (65–495 cm<sup>2</sup>). The Cu-Fe/AZZ/SiC catalyst was tested in all three configurations for comparison including traditional reformer (TR), MR, and DSMR at 300 kPaG of pressure, 673 K of temperature, 3/1 of S/C ratio, 187 cm<sup>2</sup> of membrane area, and 12.23 kg<sub>feed</sub> h<sup>−1</sup> kg<sup>−1</sup><sub>catalyst</sub> of WHSV. Following the performance testing a higher methanol conversion is obtained in the case of DSMR. For instance, the methanol conversion of ∼75 % is achieved in the case of DSMR compared to ∼57 % in MR and ∼53 % in TR. Moreover, H<sub>2</sub> recovery of more than 74.5 % is achieved in DSMR which is 8.5 % higher compared to MR. This is attributed to the enhanced hydrogen recovery in DSMR which helped to achieve higher methanol conversion according to the Le Chatelier's principle. This dual-stage configuration improved hydrogen separation and encouraged equilibrium shifting toward the desired product.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Energy Institute","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 102236"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental investigation of double-stage membrane reformer (DSMR) for enhanced hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming\",\"authors\":\"Keshav Kumar ,&nbsp;Sachin Kumar Vishwakarma ,&nbsp;Amit Kumar ,&nbsp;Sweta Sharma ,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joei.2025.102236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Methanol steam reforming (MSR) provides an effective option for on-site hydrogen generation through a membrane reformer (MR) equipped with the Pd-based membrane for H<sub>2</sub> separation from the mixture gas produced during MSR. However, a major obstacle toward scale-up and commercialization is the restricted mass and heat transfer across the catalyst bed. Additionally, a substantial quantity of hydrogen is emitted in the retentate that goes unrecovered. Therefore, in the present study, we have used the structured SiC foam coated with Cu-Fe/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-Zn-ZrO<sub>2</sub> (AZZ, Cu-Fe = 50:50 mol ratio, and AZZ = 70:15:12) catalyst to intensify the radial heat and mass transfer inside the reactor. Further, a multi-pass membrane separator (MPMS) is introduced on the retentate side of the MR to recover the leftover hydrogen, the integrated system is termed as a double-stage membrane reformer (DSMR), functioning as a standalone H<sub>2</sub> production and separation module, to effectively separate the unrecovered H<sub>2</sub> from the retentate stream of the MR. The performance of the DSMR was optimized at different temperatures (573–673 K), pressures (100–300 kPaG), weight hourly space velocity (WHSV, 12.23 to 48.92 <span><math><mrow><msub><mtext>kg</mtext><mtext>feed</mtext></msub><msup><mrow><mspace></mspace><mi>h</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>‐</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup><msubsup><mrow><mspace></mspace><mtext>kg</mtext></mrow><mtext>catalyst</mtext><mrow><mo>‐</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math></span>), and varying membrane areas (65–495 cm<sup>2</sup>). The Cu-Fe/AZZ/SiC catalyst was tested in all three configurations for comparison including traditional reformer (TR), MR, and DSMR at 300 kPaG of pressure, 673 K of temperature, 3/1 of S/C ratio, 187 cm<sup>2</sup> of membrane area, and 12.23 kg<sub>feed</sub> h<sup>−1</sup> kg<sup>−1</sup><sub>catalyst</sub> of WHSV. Following the performance testing a higher methanol conversion is obtained in the case of DSMR. For instance, the methanol conversion of ∼75 % is achieved in the case of DSMR compared to ∼57 % in MR and ∼53 % in TR. Moreover, H<sub>2</sub> recovery of more than 74.5 % is achieved in DSMR which is 8.5 % higher compared to MR. This is attributed to the enhanced hydrogen recovery in DSMR which helped to achieve higher methanol conversion according to the Le Chatelier's principle. This dual-stage configuration improved hydrogen separation and encouraged equilibrium shifting toward the desired product.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Energy Institute\",\"volume\":\"123 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Energy Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967125002648\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Energy Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967125002648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

甲醇蒸汽重整(MSR)为现场制氢提供了一种有效的选择,通过配备pd基膜的膜重整器(MR)从MSR过程中产生的混合气体中分离H2。然而,扩大规模和商业化的主要障碍是催化剂床上有限的质量和热传递。此外,大量的氢在未回收的滞留物中被释放出来。因此,在本研究中,我们采用结构SiC泡沫包覆Cu-Fe/Al2O3-Zn-ZrO2 (AZZ, Cu-Fe = 50:50摩尔比,AZZ = 70:15:12)催化剂来强化反应器内径向传热传质。此外,在MR的保留液侧引入了一个多通道膜分离器(MPMS)来回收剩余的氢气,该集成系统被称为双级膜重整器(DSMR),作为一个独立的H2生产和分离模块,可以有效地从MR的保留液流中分离未回收的H2。DSMR的性能在不同温度(573-673 K)、压力(100-300 kPaG)、重量小时空速(WHSV)、12.23至48.92 kgfeedh‐1kgcatalyst‐1),不同的膜面积(65-495 cm2)。在压力为300 kPaG、温度为673 K、S/C比为3/1、膜面积为187 cm2、WHSV催化剂为12.23 kg / h−1 kg−1的条件下,对Cu-Fe/AZZ/SiC催化剂进行了传统重整器(TR)、MR和DSMR三种构型的对比试验。在性能测试之后,在DSMR的情况下获得了更高的甲醇转化率。例如,DSMR的甲醇转化率为~ 75%,而MR为~ 57%,TR为~ 53%。此外,DSMR的H2回收率超过74.5%,比MR高8.5%。这是由于DSMR中的氢回收率提高,根据勒夏特列原理,DSMR有助于实现更高的甲醇转化率。这种双级配置改善了氢分离,并鼓励平衡向所需产品转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Experimental investigation of double-stage membrane reformer (DSMR) for enhanced hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming

Experimental investigation of double-stage membrane reformer (DSMR) for enhanced hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming
Methanol steam reforming (MSR) provides an effective option for on-site hydrogen generation through a membrane reformer (MR) equipped with the Pd-based membrane for H2 separation from the mixture gas produced during MSR. However, a major obstacle toward scale-up and commercialization is the restricted mass and heat transfer across the catalyst bed. Additionally, a substantial quantity of hydrogen is emitted in the retentate that goes unrecovered. Therefore, in the present study, we have used the structured SiC foam coated with Cu-Fe/Al2O3-Zn-ZrO2 (AZZ, Cu-Fe = 50:50 mol ratio, and AZZ = 70:15:12) catalyst to intensify the radial heat and mass transfer inside the reactor. Further, a multi-pass membrane separator (MPMS) is introduced on the retentate side of the MR to recover the leftover hydrogen, the integrated system is termed as a double-stage membrane reformer (DSMR), functioning as a standalone H2 production and separation module, to effectively separate the unrecovered H2 from the retentate stream of the MR. The performance of the DSMR was optimized at different temperatures (573–673 K), pressures (100–300 kPaG), weight hourly space velocity (WHSV, 12.23 to 48.92 kgfeedh1kgcatalyst1), and varying membrane areas (65–495 cm2). The Cu-Fe/AZZ/SiC catalyst was tested in all three configurations for comparison including traditional reformer (TR), MR, and DSMR at 300 kPaG of pressure, 673 K of temperature, 3/1 of S/C ratio, 187 cm2 of membrane area, and 12.23 kgfeed h−1 kg−1catalyst of WHSV. Following the performance testing a higher methanol conversion is obtained in the case of DSMR. For instance, the methanol conversion of ∼75 % is achieved in the case of DSMR compared to ∼57 % in MR and ∼53 % in TR. Moreover, H2 recovery of more than 74.5 % is achieved in DSMR which is 8.5 % higher compared to MR. This is attributed to the enhanced hydrogen recovery in DSMR which helped to achieve higher methanol conversion according to the Le Chatelier's principle. This dual-stage configuration improved hydrogen separation and encouraged equilibrium shifting toward the desired product.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The Energy Institute
Journal of The Energy Institute 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
166
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Energy Institute provides peer reviewed coverage of original high quality research on energy, engineering and technology.The coverage is broad and the main areas of interest include: Combustion engineering and associated technologies; process heating; power generation; engines and propulsion; emissions and environmental pollution control; clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies Emissions and environmental pollution control; safety and hazards; Clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies, including carbon capture and storage, CCS; Petroleum engineering and fuel quality, including storage and transport Alternative energy sources; biomass utilisation and biomass conversion technologies; energy from waste, incineration and recycling Energy conversion, energy recovery and energy efficiency; space heating, fuel cells, heat pumps and cooling systems Energy storage The journal''s coverage reflects changes in energy technology that result from the transition to more efficient energy production and end use together with reduced carbon emission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信