多个,而不是单一,受者肌肉肌腱转移产生良好定向的指尖力量在横向捏抓:模拟研究应用于四肢瘫痪后改善抓恢复

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Oliver Garcia, Joseph D. Towles
{"title":"多个,而不是单一,受者肌肉肌腱转移产生良好定向的指尖力量在横向捏抓:模拟研究应用于四肢瘫痪后改善抓恢复","authors":"Oliver Garcia,&nbsp;Joseph D. Towles","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thumb tendon transfer surgical procedures in patients with cervical spinal injury engage the paralyzed flexor pollicis longus (FPL) muscle to enable lateral pinch grasp. However, functional outcomes are mixed, in part because the FPL cannot consistently produce force at the thumb-tip to promote a stable grasp. We used simulation to investigate whether a multiple recipient muscle tendon transfer, targeting sets of paralyzed muscles driven by a single donor muscle, could outperform a single recipient muscle tendon transfer with the FPL alone and restore lateral pinch. We formed 36 groups of 2 muscles, 84 groups of 3 muscles, and 126 groups of 4 muscles. We used nonlinear optimization and in-situ measurements of muscle endpoint forces in 3 lateral pinch postures. In each posture, we primarily compared the orientation of the endpoint force of each muscle group to that produced by the FPL alone. We found that 116 of the 246 muscle groups produced endpoint forces that were more closely aligned with the direction perpendicular to the thumb (palmar direction) than the FPL was for wide and narrow lateral pinch postures and a posture in between. When averaged across the three postures, muscle force ranged from 0.1 to 90.4 N, muscle group endpoint force magnitudes ranged from 2.5 to 14.9 N, and muscle group endpoint force directions ranged from 17° to 49° relative to the palmar direction. The muscle group endpoint force directional range represented a mean improvement of 8° to 40° over the FPL’s mean endpoint force direction across all three postures. Our findings highlight the possibility of using multiple recipient muscle tendon transfers to restore grasp following cervical spinal cord injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 112882"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple, not single, recipient muscle tendon transfers produce well-directed thumb-tip forces in lateral pinch grasp: A simulation study with application to restoration of improved grasp after tetraplegia\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Garcia,&nbsp;Joseph D. Towles\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Thumb tendon transfer surgical procedures in patients with cervical spinal injury engage the paralyzed flexor pollicis longus (FPL) muscle to enable lateral pinch grasp. However, functional outcomes are mixed, in part because the FPL cannot consistently produce force at the thumb-tip to promote a stable grasp. We used simulation to investigate whether a multiple recipient muscle tendon transfer, targeting sets of paralyzed muscles driven by a single donor muscle, could outperform a single recipient muscle tendon transfer with the FPL alone and restore lateral pinch. We formed 36 groups of 2 muscles, 84 groups of 3 muscles, and 126 groups of 4 muscles. We used nonlinear optimization and in-situ measurements of muscle endpoint forces in 3 lateral pinch postures. In each posture, we primarily compared the orientation of the endpoint force of each muscle group to that produced by the FPL alone. We found that 116 of the 246 muscle groups produced endpoint forces that were more closely aligned with the direction perpendicular to the thumb (palmar direction) than the FPL was for wide and narrow lateral pinch postures and a posture in between. When averaged across the three postures, muscle force ranged from 0.1 to 90.4 N, muscle group endpoint force magnitudes ranged from 2.5 to 14.9 N, and muscle group endpoint force directions ranged from 17° to 49° relative to the palmar direction. The muscle group endpoint force directional range represented a mean improvement of 8° to 40° over the FPL’s mean endpoint force direction across all three postures. Our findings highlight the possibility of using multiple recipient muscle tendon transfers to restore grasp following cervical spinal cord injury.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112882\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500394X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192902500394X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈椎损伤患者的拇指肌腱转移手术涉及瘫痪的拇长屈肌(FPL),以实现外侧捏抓。然而,功能结果是混合的,部分原因是FPL不能始终如一地在拇指尖产生力来促进稳定的抓握。我们通过模拟来研究由单个供肌驱动的多受体肌肉肌腱移植是否能优于仅使用FPL的单个受体肌肉肌腱移植并恢复侧夹。2组肌36组,3组肌84组,4组肌126组。我们使用非线性优化和原位测量肌肉端点力在3侧捏姿势。在每个姿势中,我们主要比较了每个肌肉群的终点力方向与FPL单独产生的方向。我们发现246个肌肉群中的116个产生的终点力与垂直于拇指方向(手掌方向)的方向更紧密地对齐,而不是FPL在宽和窄侧捏姿势以及介于两者之间的姿势。三种体位的平均肌肉力范围为0.1 ~ 90.4 N,肌群终点力大小范围为2.5 ~ 14.9 N,肌群终点力方向相对于掌向为17°~ 49°。肌群终点力方向范围比FPL的平均终点力方向在所有三种姿势中平均改善了8°至40°。我们的研究结果强调了使用多个受体肌肉肌腱转移来恢复颈脊髓损伤后抓取的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiple, not single, recipient muscle tendon transfers produce well-directed thumb-tip forces in lateral pinch grasp: A simulation study with application to restoration of improved grasp after tetraplegia
Thumb tendon transfer surgical procedures in patients with cervical spinal injury engage the paralyzed flexor pollicis longus (FPL) muscle to enable lateral pinch grasp. However, functional outcomes are mixed, in part because the FPL cannot consistently produce force at the thumb-tip to promote a stable grasp. We used simulation to investigate whether a multiple recipient muscle tendon transfer, targeting sets of paralyzed muscles driven by a single donor muscle, could outperform a single recipient muscle tendon transfer with the FPL alone and restore lateral pinch. We formed 36 groups of 2 muscles, 84 groups of 3 muscles, and 126 groups of 4 muscles. We used nonlinear optimization and in-situ measurements of muscle endpoint forces in 3 lateral pinch postures. In each posture, we primarily compared the orientation of the endpoint force of each muscle group to that produced by the FPL alone. We found that 116 of the 246 muscle groups produced endpoint forces that were more closely aligned with the direction perpendicular to the thumb (palmar direction) than the FPL was for wide and narrow lateral pinch postures and a posture in between. When averaged across the three postures, muscle force ranged from 0.1 to 90.4 N, muscle group endpoint force magnitudes ranged from 2.5 to 14.9 N, and muscle group endpoint force directions ranged from 17° to 49° relative to the palmar direction. The muscle group endpoint force directional range represented a mean improvement of 8° to 40° over the FPL’s mean endpoint force direction across all three postures. Our findings highlight the possibility of using multiple recipient muscle tendon transfers to restore grasp following cervical spinal cord injury.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信