孤立性冠状动脉扩张患者致心律失常危险的心电图标志物

IF 2.1 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Forouzan Salari , Hossein Nough , Seyed Mostafa Seyedhosseini , Seyedeh Mahdieh Namayandeh
{"title":"孤立性冠状动脉扩张患者致心律失常危险的心电图标志物","authors":"Forouzan Salari ,&nbsp;Hossein Nough ,&nbsp;Seyed Mostafa Seyedhosseini ,&nbsp;Seyedeh Mahdieh Namayandeh","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is an uncommon finding with potential clinical implications, including arrhythmogenic risk. Electrocardiographic parameters such as QT dispersion (QTd) and P wave dispersion (PWD) have been proposed as non-invasive predictors of electrical instability. This study aimed to compare ECG findings, between patients with isolated CAE and those with normal coronary arteries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this case-control study, 23 patients with isolated CAE (Group 1) and 26 patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries (Group 2) were enrolled. Groups were matched for age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, and ejection fraction. Patients with conditions or medications affecting conduction were excluded. ECG parameters were compared using Chi-square and unpaired t-tests. Additional subgroup analyses using ANOVA, Spearman correlation, and linear mixed models were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>T wave inversion was significantly more common in Group 1 than Group 2 (52.2 % vs. 11.5 %, <em>P</em> = 0.006). QTc was significantly prolonged in Group 1 (<em>P</em> = 0.046). QTd, QTcd, and PWD were all significantly greater in Group 1 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). QTd, QTcd, and PWD were positively correlated with the number of ectatic vessels (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). However, PR interval, QRS duration, and QTc did not show significant associations. ECG parameters did not significantly differ based on the specific ectatic vessel. Significant variation in QTd, QTcd, and PWD was observed across different Markis types.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with isolated CAE exhibit greater QT dispersion and P wave dispersion compared to controls, suggesting a higher arrhythmogenic potential. These parameters also correlate with the extent and classification of ectasia, highlighting their potential utility in risk stratification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 200492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrocardiographic markers of arrhythmogenic risk in patients with isolated coronary artery ectasia\",\"authors\":\"Forouzan Salari ,&nbsp;Hossein Nough ,&nbsp;Seyed Mostafa Seyedhosseini ,&nbsp;Seyedeh Mahdieh Namayandeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is an uncommon finding with potential clinical implications, including arrhythmogenic risk. Electrocardiographic parameters such as QT dispersion (QTd) and P wave dispersion (PWD) have been proposed as non-invasive predictors of electrical instability. This study aimed to compare ECG findings, between patients with isolated CAE and those with normal coronary arteries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this case-control study, 23 patients with isolated CAE (Group 1) and 26 patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries (Group 2) were enrolled. Groups were matched for age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, and ejection fraction. Patients with conditions or medications affecting conduction were excluded. ECG parameters were compared using Chi-square and unpaired t-tests. Additional subgroup analyses using ANOVA, Spearman correlation, and linear mixed models were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>T wave inversion was significantly more common in Group 1 than Group 2 (52.2 % vs. 11.5 %, <em>P</em> = 0.006). QTc was significantly prolonged in Group 1 (<em>P</em> = 0.046). QTd, QTcd, and PWD were all significantly greater in Group 1 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). QTd, QTcd, and PWD were positively correlated with the number of ectatic vessels (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). However, PR interval, QRS duration, and QTc did not show significant associations. ECG parameters did not significantly differ based on the specific ectatic vessel. Significant variation in QTd, QTcd, and PWD was observed across different Markis types.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with isolated CAE exhibit greater QT dispersion and P wave dispersion compared to controls, suggesting a higher arrhythmogenic potential. These parameters also correlate with the extent and classification of ectasia, highlighting their potential utility in risk stratification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 200492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487525001308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487525001308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景冠状动脉扩张(CAE)是一种罕见的发现,具有潜在的临床意义,包括致心律失常的风险。心电图参数如QT离散度(QTd)和P波离散度(PWD)已被提出作为电不稳定性的无创预测指标。本研究旨在比较孤立CAE患者和冠状动脉正常患者的心电图表现。方法选取23例孤立CAE患者(1组)和26例冠状动脉造影正常患者(2组)作为病例对照研究对象。各组根据年龄、性别、心血管危险因素和射血分数进行匹配。排除有影响传导的疾病或药物的患者。心电图参数比较采用卡方检验和非配对t检验。使用方差分析、Spearman相关和线性混合模型进行额外的亚组分析。结果1组st波反转发生率明显高于2组(52.2%比11.5%,P = 0.006)。第1组QTc明显延长(P = 0.046)。第1组QTd、QTcd、PWD均显著增高(P <;0.05)。QTd、QTcd、PWD与扩张血管数呈正相关(P <;0.001)。PR间期、QRS持续时间和QTc无显著相关性。不同扩张血管的心电图参数无明显差异。QTd、QTcd和PWD在不同Markis类型中存在显著差异。结论孤立性CAE患者QT离散度和P波离散度均高于对照组,提示有较高的致心律失常电位。这些参数也与扩张的程度和分类相关,突出了它们在风险分层中的潜在效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrocardiographic markers of arrhythmogenic risk in patients with isolated coronary artery ectasia

Background

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is an uncommon finding with potential clinical implications, including arrhythmogenic risk. Electrocardiographic parameters such as QT dispersion (QTd) and P wave dispersion (PWD) have been proposed as non-invasive predictors of electrical instability. This study aimed to compare ECG findings, between patients with isolated CAE and those with normal coronary arteries.

Methods

In this case-control study, 23 patients with isolated CAE (Group 1) and 26 patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries (Group 2) were enrolled. Groups were matched for age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, and ejection fraction. Patients with conditions or medications affecting conduction were excluded. ECG parameters were compared using Chi-square and unpaired t-tests. Additional subgroup analyses using ANOVA, Spearman correlation, and linear mixed models were performed.

Results

T wave inversion was significantly more common in Group 1 than Group 2 (52.2 % vs. 11.5 %, P = 0.006). QTc was significantly prolonged in Group 1 (P = 0.046). QTd, QTcd, and PWD were all significantly greater in Group 1 (P < 0.05). QTd, QTcd, and PWD were positively correlated with the number of ectatic vessels (P < 0.001). However, PR interval, QRS duration, and QTc did not show significant associations. ECG parameters did not significantly differ based on the specific ectatic vessel. Significant variation in QTd, QTcd, and PWD was observed across different Markis types.

Conclusions

Patients with isolated CAE exhibit greater QT dispersion and P wave dispersion compared to controls, suggesting a higher arrhythmogenic potential. These parameters also correlate with the extent and classification of ectasia, highlighting their potential utility in risk stratification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信