{"title":"基于事件分析的区域原材料供应风险可视化","authors":"Hiroki Hatayama , Shinsuke Murakami , Yurie Anzai","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving stable and resilient mineral supply requires a good understanding of the diverse risk factors present in various regions, which vary in their severity levels. Conventional criticality assessments typically consider risk factors such as political stability and investment attractiveness using country-level indicators. However, there are severe risk factors that have yet to be incorporated due to the lack of data and methodology to evaluate them. This study quantifies country-specific risks of new risk domains such as natural disasters, accidents, and labor strikes through a meta-analysis of historical events. The risk scores for 93 source countries are calculated based on the number of records referring to those events, which were obtained through document investigation using three different approaches to event analysis. Our analysis reveals high risk scores for resource-rich developed countries like Australia and Canada due to the high frequency of events, which suggests a distinct feature of regional risk compared to the conventional domains of supply risk evaluation. This study highlights the significant potential of event analysis to provide evidence for policy design in supply chain risk management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 105718"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visualizing the regional risk in raw material supply based on event analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Hatayama , Shinsuke Murakami , Yurie Anzai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Achieving stable and resilient mineral supply requires a good understanding of the diverse risk factors present in various regions, which vary in their severity levels. Conventional criticality assessments typically consider risk factors such as political stability and investment attractiveness using country-level indicators. However, there are severe risk factors that have yet to be incorporated due to the lack of data and methodology to evaluate them. This study quantifies country-specific risks of new risk domains such as natural disasters, accidents, and labor strikes through a meta-analysis of historical events. The risk scores for 93 source countries are calculated based on the number of records referring to those events, which were obtained through document investigation using three different approaches to event analysis. Our analysis reveals high risk scores for resource-rich developed countries like Australia and Canada due to the high frequency of events, which suggests a distinct feature of regional risk compared to the conventional domains of supply risk evaluation. This study highlights the significant potential of event analysis to provide evidence for policy design in supply chain risk management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002600\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002600","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Visualizing the regional risk in raw material supply based on event analysis
Achieving stable and resilient mineral supply requires a good understanding of the diverse risk factors present in various regions, which vary in their severity levels. Conventional criticality assessments typically consider risk factors such as political stability and investment attractiveness using country-level indicators. However, there are severe risk factors that have yet to be incorporated due to the lack of data and methodology to evaluate them. This study quantifies country-specific risks of new risk domains such as natural disasters, accidents, and labor strikes through a meta-analysis of historical events. The risk scores for 93 source countries are calculated based on the number of records referring to those events, which were obtained through document investigation using three different approaches to event analysis. Our analysis reveals high risk scores for resource-rich developed countries like Australia and Canada due to the high frequency of events, which suggests a distinct feature of regional risk compared to the conventional domains of supply risk evaluation. This study highlights the significant potential of event analysis to provide evidence for policy design in supply chain risk management.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.