Caio Maximino, Heloysa Araujo-Silva, Inês Cacela-Rodrigues, Ana C Luchiari, João L Saraiva, Marta C Soares
{"title":"清洁-客户鱼相互作用的享乐影响是由阿片系统介导的。","authors":"Caio Maximino, Heloysa Araujo-Silva, Inês Cacela-Rodrigues, Ana C Luchiari, João L Saraiva, Marta C Soares","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2025.1532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to the 'incentive salience hypothesis' reward processing involves two main components, including the motivation to obtain a reward (i.e. incentive salience or 'wanting') and the hedonic pleasure felt during its consumption (i.e. hedonic impact or 'liking'), which are dissociable. The processing of these hedonic mechanisms is suggested to be mediated by opioid neurotransmission; however, most evidence comes from humans and other mammals. Here we argue that, in mutualistic associations, client fish seek to interact with cleaner fish not only due to the immediate benefits of being cleaned but also because of the hedonic impact of tactile stimulation, modulated by the opioid system. We used a conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm to test the hedonic dimension of motivation to be cleaned and found that de-parasitized client fish (the butterflyfish <i>Chaetodon auriga</i>) preferred the compartment paired with cleaner fish (<i>Labroides dimidiatus</i>). Treatment with the μ-opioid receptor agonist The µ-opioid receptor agonist 2-Ala-4-mephe-5-gly-enkephalin (DAMGO) dose-dependently increased preference, while treatment with the antagonist naloxone decreased it. To test for fish incentive salience, we used a detour task, with barriers being added after each trial to demand higher response strength to reach the target and found that client fish can circumvent barriers to reach a cleaner-adjacent compartment. Response strength (number of barriers added before 'giving up') was not affected by treatment with either naloxone or DAMGO. Our results show that cleaner-client interactions are hedonically positive for clients, an effect that is mediated by the opiodergic system. Visual contact with cleaners is sufficient to activate incentive salience programmes, but no evidence of participation of the opioidergic system in these programmes was found. Overall, we provide the first evidence confirming the participation of the opioidergic system in motivation to be cleaned in mutualistic associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520757,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Biological sciences","volume":"292 2052","pages":"20251532"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The hedonic impact of cleaner-client fish interactions is mediated by the opioid system.\",\"authors\":\"Caio Maximino, Heloysa Araujo-Silva, Inês Cacela-Rodrigues, Ana C Luchiari, João L Saraiva, Marta C Soares\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rspb.2025.1532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>According to the 'incentive salience hypothesis' reward processing involves two main components, including the motivation to obtain a reward (i.e. incentive salience or 'wanting') and the hedonic pleasure felt during its consumption (i.e. hedonic impact or 'liking'), which are dissociable. The processing of these hedonic mechanisms is suggested to be mediated by opioid neurotransmission; however, most evidence comes from humans and other mammals. Here we argue that, in mutualistic associations, client fish seek to interact with cleaner fish not only due to the immediate benefits of being cleaned but also because of the hedonic impact of tactile stimulation, modulated by the opioid system. We used a conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm to test the hedonic dimension of motivation to be cleaned and found that de-parasitized client fish (the butterflyfish <i>Chaetodon auriga</i>) preferred the compartment paired with cleaner fish (<i>Labroides dimidiatus</i>). Treatment with the μ-opioid receptor agonist The µ-opioid receptor agonist 2-Ala-4-mephe-5-gly-enkephalin (DAMGO) dose-dependently increased preference, while treatment with the antagonist naloxone decreased it. To test for fish incentive salience, we used a detour task, with barriers being added after each trial to demand higher response strength to reach the target and found that client fish can circumvent barriers to reach a cleaner-adjacent compartment. Response strength (number of barriers added before 'giving up') was not affected by treatment with either naloxone or DAMGO. Our results show that cleaner-client interactions are hedonically positive for clients, an effect that is mediated by the opiodergic system. Visual contact with cleaners is sufficient to activate incentive salience programmes, but no evidence of participation of the opioidergic system in these programmes was found. Overall, we provide the first evidence confirming the participation of the opioidergic system in motivation to be cleaned in mutualistic associations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Biological sciences\",\"volume\":\"292 2052\",\"pages\":\"20251532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343142/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Biological sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.1532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Biological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.1532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
根据“激励显著性假说”,奖励处理包括两个主要组成部分,包括获得奖励的动机(即激励显著性或“想要”)和在消费过程中感受到的享乐快乐(即享乐影响或“喜欢”),这两个部分是可分离的。这些享乐机制的加工被认为是由阿片神经传递介导的;然而,大多数证据来自人类和其他哺乳动物。我们认为,在互惠关系中,客户鱼寻求与清洁鱼互动,不仅是因为被清洁的直接好处,还因为触觉刺激的享乐影响,由阿片系统调节。我们使用条件位置偏好(CPP)范式测试了清洁动机的享乐维度,发现去寄生的客户鱼(蝴蝶鱼)更喜欢与清洁鱼(Labroides dimidiatus)配对的隔间。µ-阿片受体激动剂2- ala -4- mephee -5-gly-enkephalin (DAMGO)剂量依赖性地增加了偏好,而拮抗剂纳洛酮则降低了偏好。为了测试鱼类的激励显著性,我们使用了绕道任务,在每次试验后添加障碍以要求更高的反应强度以达到目标,并发现客户鱼可以绕过障碍到达相邻的清洁隔间。反应强度(在“放弃”之前增加的屏障数量)不受纳洛酮或DAMGO治疗的影响。我们的研究结果表明,清洁者与客户的互动对客户来说是积极的,这种效果是由阿片能系统介导的。与清洁工的视觉接触足以激活激励突出程序,但没有证据表明阿片能系统参与这些程序。总的来说,我们提供了第一个证据,证实阿片能系统参与了互助协会中被清洁的动机。
The hedonic impact of cleaner-client fish interactions is mediated by the opioid system.
According to the 'incentive salience hypothesis' reward processing involves two main components, including the motivation to obtain a reward (i.e. incentive salience or 'wanting') and the hedonic pleasure felt during its consumption (i.e. hedonic impact or 'liking'), which are dissociable. The processing of these hedonic mechanisms is suggested to be mediated by opioid neurotransmission; however, most evidence comes from humans and other mammals. Here we argue that, in mutualistic associations, client fish seek to interact with cleaner fish not only due to the immediate benefits of being cleaned but also because of the hedonic impact of tactile stimulation, modulated by the opioid system. We used a conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm to test the hedonic dimension of motivation to be cleaned and found that de-parasitized client fish (the butterflyfish Chaetodon auriga) preferred the compartment paired with cleaner fish (Labroides dimidiatus). Treatment with the μ-opioid receptor agonist The µ-opioid receptor agonist 2-Ala-4-mephe-5-gly-enkephalin (DAMGO) dose-dependently increased preference, while treatment with the antagonist naloxone decreased it. To test for fish incentive salience, we used a detour task, with barriers being added after each trial to demand higher response strength to reach the target and found that client fish can circumvent barriers to reach a cleaner-adjacent compartment. Response strength (number of barriers added before 'giving up') was not affected by treatment with either naloxone or DAMGO. Our results show that cleaner-client interactions are hedonically positive for clients, an effect that is mediated by the opiodergic system. Visual contact with cleaners is sufficient to activate incentive salience programmes, but no evidence of participation of the opioidergic system in these programmes was found. Overall, we provide the first evidence confirming the participation of the opioidergic system in motivation to be cleaned in mutualistic associations.