朝鲜族黑人与白人造径测验的规范研究。

IF 2.1
Jeewon Suh, Min Jae Baek, Yeonwook Kang, SangYun Kim
{"title":"朝鲜族黑人与白人造径测验的规范研究。","authors":"Jeewon Suh, Min Jae Baek, Yeonwook Kang, SangYun Kim","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acaf071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although the Trail Making Test (TMT) is widely used to identify cognitive dysfunction, it has limited utility in cross-cultural contexts due to the use of the English alphabet in a subset of the test. The TMT-Black and White (TMT-B&W) is a newly developed version of the TMT that uses only black and white circles to overcome performance biases among non-English-speaking and illiterate older individuals. The objective of this study was to provide initial normative data for the TMT-B&W from the Korean population and investigate the influence of age, sex, and education level on the time taken to complete the test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 1012 participants (430 men and 582 women) aged 19 to 90 in the community settings including a Welfare Center for the Elderly. TMT-B&W tests were conducted, and the time to completion of the test was measured. Scaled scores (M = 10, SD = 3) were calculated and multiple regression analyses were conducted to establish regression based normative T-scores (M = 50, SD = 10) for the TMT-B&W part A and B.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, education level, and sex significantly predicted TMT-B&W Part A and Part B performance. The regression models explained 52.6% of the variance for Part A and 69.6% for Part B. Demographically adjusted T-scores were developed, providing standardized normative data for clinical interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provided normative data for the TMT-B&W in the Korean population. This new version of the TMT has the potential to be employed in cross-cultural contexts without language barriers, although further validation across diverse populations is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Normative Study of the Trail Making Test-Black and White in the Korean Population.\",\"authors\":\"Jeewon Suh, Min Jae Baek, Yeonwook Kang, SangYun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arclin/acaf071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although the Trail Making Test (TMT) is widely used to identify cognitive dysfunction, it has limited utility in cross-cultural contexts due to the use of the English alphabet in a subset of the test. The TMT-Black and White (TMT-B&W) is a newly developed version of the TMT that uses only black and white circles to overcome performance biases among non-English-speaking and illiterate older individuals. The objective of this study was to provide initial normative data for the TMT-B&W from the Korean population and investigate the influence of age, sex, and education level on the time taken to complete the test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 1012 participants (430 men and 582 women) aged 19 to 90 in the community settings including a Welfare Center for the Elderly. TMT-B&W tests were conducted, and the time to completion of the test was measured. Scaled scores (M = 10, SD = 3) were calculated and multiple regression analyses were conducted to establish regression based normative T-scores (M = 50, SD = 10) for the TMT-B&W part A and B.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, education level, and sex significantly predicted TMT-B&W Part A and Part B performance. The regression models explained 52.6% of the variance for Part A and 69.6% for Part B. Demographically adjusted T-scores were developed, providing standardized normative data for clinical interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provided normative data for the TMT-B&W in the Korean population. This new version of the TMT has the potential to be employed in cross-cultural contexts without language barriers, although further validation across diverse populations is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然线索制造测试(TMT)被广泛用于识别认知功能障碍,但由于在测试的一个子集中使用英语字母,它在跨文化背景下的效用有限。TMT- black and White (TMT- b&w)是TMT的新开发版本,仅使用黑白圈来克服非英语和文盲老年人的表现偏见。本研究的目的是为韩国人口的TMT-B&W提供初步的规范性数据,并调查年龄、性别和教育水平对完成测试所需时间的影响。方法:我们在包括老年人福利中心在内的社区环境中招募了1012名参与者(430名男性和582名女性),年龄在19至90岁之间。进行了TMT-B&W试验,并测量了完成试验所需的时间。计算量表得分(M = 10, SD = 3),并进行多元回归分析,建立基于回归的TMT-B&W A、B部分的规范t得分(M = 50, SD = 10)。结果:年龄、受教育程度、性别对TMT-B&W A、B部分的成绩有显著预测作用。回归模型解释了A部分52.6%的方差和b部分69.6%的方差,开发了人口统计学调整的t评分,为临床解释提供了标准化的规范性数据。结论:本研究为韩国人群TMT-B&W提供了规范性数据。这个新版本的TMT有可能在跨文化背景下使用,没有语言障碍,尽管需要在不同人群中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Normative Study of the Trail Making Test-Black and White in the Korean Population.

Objective: Although the Trail Making Test (TMT) is widely used to identify cognitive dysfunction, it has limited utility in cross-cultural contexts due to the use of the English alphabet in a subset of the test. The TMT-Black and White (TMT-B&W) is a newly developed version of the TMT that uses only black and white circles to overcome performance biases among non-English-speaking and illiterate older individuals. The objective of this study was to provide initial normative data for the TMT-B&W from the Korean population and investigate the influence of age, sex, and education level on the time taken to complete the test.

Methods: We recruited 1012 participants (430 men and 582 women) aged 19 to 90 in the community settings including a Welfare Center for the Elderly. TMT-B&W tests were conducted, and the time to completion of the test was measured. Scaled scores (M = 10, SD = 3) were calculated and multiple regression analyses were conducted to establish regression based normative T-scores (M = 50, SD = 10) for the TMT-B&W part A and B.

Results: Age, education level, and sex significantly predicted TMT-B&W Part A and Part B performance. The regression models explained 52.6% of the variance for Part A and 69.6% for Part B. Demographically adjusted T-scores were developed, providing standardized normative data for clinical interpretation.

Conclusion: This study provided normative data for the TMT-B&W in the Korean population. This new version of the TMT has the potential to be employed in cross-cultural contexts without language barriers, although further validation across diverse populations is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信