影响学生教学评价的因素:一项描述性研究。

IF 1.9
Staci S Reynolds, Lisa Lewis, Vickey Keathley
{"title":"影响学生教学评价的因素:一项描述性研究。","authors":"Staci S Reynolds, Lisa Lewis, Vickey Keathley","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20250313-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Student evaluations of teaching (SETs) provide educators feedback to improve the quality of instruction; however, response rates often are low. Incentives may be used, but there is limited data on their effect on SETs response rates and course means.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study used a descriptive study design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 courses were included in the data review. SETs response rates were significantly higher in those courses that offered an incentive, yet course means were higher in courses that did not offer an incentive. SETs response rates were higher for required courses; course means were higher for non-clinical and elective courses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study adds to the body of evidence regarding the use of incentives for completing SETs and other factors that may influence response rates and course means. This study found that incentives increased response rates on SETs without affecting course ratings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":"64 8","pages":"475-478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing Student Evaluations of Teaching: A Descriptive Study.\",\"authors\":\"Staci S Reynolds, Lisa Lewis, Vickey Keathley\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01484834-20250313-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Student evaluations of teaching (SETs) provide educators feedback to improve the quality of instruction; however, response rates often are low. Incentives may be used, but there is limited data on their effect on SETs response rates and course means.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study used a descriptive study design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 courses were included in the data review. SETs response rates were significantly higher in those courses that offered an incentive, yet course means were higher in courses that did not offer an incentive. SETs response rates were higher for required courses; course means were higher for non-clinical and elective courses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study adds to the body of evidence regarding the use of incentives for completing SETs and other factors that may influence response rates and course means. This study found that incentives increased response rates on SETs without affecting course ratings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of nursing education\",\"volume\":\"64 8\",\"pages\":\"475-478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of nursing education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20250313-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20250313-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学生教学评价(set)为教育工作者提供反馈以提高教学质量;然而,回复率往往很低。可以采用奖励措施,但关于奖励措施对环境教育反应率和过程手段的影响的数据有限。方法:本研究采用描述性研究设计。结果:数据回顾共纳入250门课程。在那些提供激励的课程中,set的反应率明显更高,而在没有提供激励的课程中,课程均值更高。必修课程的set回应率更高;非临床课程和选修课程的课程平均值较高。结论:本研究增加了关于激励完成set和其他可能影响反应率和疗程手段的因素的证据。这项研究发现,激励措施在不影响课程评分的情况下提高了set的反应率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Influencing Student Evaluations of Teaching: A Descriptive Study.

Background: Student evaluations of teaching (SETs) provide educators feedback to improve the quality of instruction; however, response rates often are low. Incentives may be used, but there is limited data on their effect on SETs response rates and course means.

Method: This study used a descriptive study design.

Results: A total of 250 courses were included in the data review. SETs response rates were significantly higher in those courses that offered an incentive, yet course means were higher in courses that did not offer an incentive. SETs response rates were higher for required courses; course means were higher for non-clinical and elective courses.

Conclusion: This study adds to the body of evidence regarding the use of incentives for completing SETs and other factors that may influence response rates and course means. This study found that incentives increased response rates on SETs without affecting course ratings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信