探索氟喹诺酮类药物即时和延迟超敏反应的皮肤试验:来自现实生活队列研究的见解

IF 3.2
Julie Boo, Damien Lannoy, Johana Bene, Léa Dehame, Clémentine Dehouck, Delphine Staumont-Salle, Frédéric Dezoteux
{"title":"探索氟喹诺酮类药物即时和延迟超敏反应的皮肤试验:来自现实生活队列研究的见解","authors":"Julie Boo, Damien Lannoy, Johana Bene, Léa Dehame, Clémentine Dehouck, Delphine Staumont-Salle, Frédéric Dezoteux","doi":"10.1177/17103568251367789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><u><b><i></i></b></u> <u><b><i>Background:</i></b></u> Fluoroquinolones (FQ) are the second most frequent antibiotics responsible for hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). Data concerning the interest of allergological work-ups are scarce. <u><b><i>Objectives:</i></b></u> We reported a university center experience of the interest and safety of skin tests (ST) and drug provocation tests (DPT) for the exploration of immediate hypersensitivity reaction (IHR) and delayed HSR (DHR) to FQ. <u><b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b></u> This retrospective study included patients tested for at least 1 FQ between 2008 and 2023. The primary outcome was the frequency of positive tests for FQ. Secondary outcomes aimed to characterize results, cross-reactivity, and tolerance of the tests. <u><b><i>Results:</i></b></u> Among the 113 patients included (32% in IHR, 68% in DHR), the overall test positivity rate was 27% (29% in DHR, 23% in IHR). Negative predictive value was 85% (80% in DHR, 95% in IHR). The most frequently positive ST was the intradermal test (7%). Allergy was more frequently confirmed for ofloxacin (OFX) (38%). Positive tests were more frequent for fixed drug eruption (67%). Cross-reactivity was detected in 15%, involving OFX and LFX or CPX and OFX. DPT was responsible for nonsevere recurrence of initial HSR for 13% of patients who had DPT and recurrence leading to a short hospitalization for 2% of them. 3% of contacted patients experienced a nonsevere recurrence of HSR in real life. <u><b><i>Conclusion:</i></b></u> This cohort demonstrates the benefit and safety of allergological exploration for FQ allowing subsequent use in 73% of cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":93974,"journal":{"name":"Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skin Testing for the Exploration of Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity to Fluoroquinolones: Insights From a Real-Life Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Julie Boo, Damien Lannoy, Johana Bene, Léa Dehame, Clémentine Dehouck, Delphine Staumont-Salle, Frédéric Dezoteux\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17103568251367789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><u><b><i></i></b></u> <u><b><i>Background:</i></b></u> Fluoroquinolones (FQ) are the second most frequent antibiotics responsible for hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). Data concerning the interest of allergological work-ups are scarce. <u><b><i>Objectives:</i></b></u> We reported a university center experience of the interest and safety of skin tests (ST) and drug provocation tests (DPT) for the exploration of immediate hypersensitivity reaction (IHR) and delayed HSR (DHR) to FQ. <u><b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b></u> This retrospective study included patients tested for at least 1 FQ between 2008 and 2023. The primary outcome was the frequency of positive tests for FQ. Secondary outcomes aimed to characterize results, cross-reactivity, and tolerance of the tests. <u><b><i>Results:</i></b></u> Among the 113 patients included (32% in IHR, 68% in DHR), the overall test positivity rate was 27% (29% in DHR, 23% in IHR). Negative predictive value was 85% (80% in DHR, 95% in IHR). The most frequently positive ST was the intradermal test (7%). Allergy was more frequently confirmed for ofloxacin (OFX) (38%). Positive tests were more frequent for fixed drug eruption (67%). Cross-reactivity was detected in 15%, involving OFX and LFX or CPX and OFX. DPT was responsible for nonsevere recurrence of initial HSR for 13% of patients who had DPT and recurrence leading to a short hospitalization for 2% of them. 3% of contacted patients experienced a nonsevere recurrence of HSR in real life. <u><b><i>Conclusion:</i></b></u> This cohort demonstrates the benefit and safety of allergological exploration for FQ allowing subsequent use in 73% of cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17103568251367789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17103568251367789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:氟喹诺酮类药物(FQ)是引起超敏反应(HSR)的第二大常见抗生素。有关过敏症检查的资料很少。目的:我们报道了一所大学中心的经验,探讨皮肤试验(ST)和药物激发试验(DPT)对FQ的即时超敏反应(IHR)和延迟HSR (DHR)的兴趣和安全性。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2008年至2023年间至少1次FQ检测的患者。主要结果是FQ阳性检测的频率。次要结局旨在描述结果、交叉反应性和试验耐受性。结果:纳入的113例患者(IHR组32%,DHR组68%),总检测阳性率为27% (DHR组29%,IHR组23%)。阴性预测值为85% (DHR为80%,IHR为95%)。最常见的ST阳性是皮内试验(7%)。氧氟沙星(OFX)更常被证实过敏(38%)。固定性药疹阳性率较高(67%)。15%检测到交叉反应,涉及OFX和LFX或CPX和OFX。DPT导致13%的DPT患者初始HSR的非严重复发,其中2%的患者复发导致短期住院。3%的接触患者在现实生活中经历了非严重的HSR复发。结论:该队列显示了对FQ进行过敏检查的益处和安全性,允许73%的病例后续使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Skin Testing for the Exploration of Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity to Fluoroquinolones: Insights From a Real-Life Cohort Study.

Background: Fluoroquinolones (FQ) are the second most frequent antibiotics responsible for hypersensitivity reaction (HSR). Data concerning the interest of allergological work-ups are scarce. Objectives: We reported a university center experience of the interest and safety of skin tests (ST) and drug provocation tests (DPT) for the exploration of immediate hypersensitivity reaction (IHR) and delayed HSR (DHR) to FQ. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients tested for at least 1 FQ between 2008 and 2023. The primary outcome was the frequency of positive tests for FQ. Secondary outcomes aimed to characterize results, cross-reactivity, and tolerance of the tests. Results: Among the 113 patients included (32% in IHR, 68% in DHR), the overall test positivity rate was 27% (29% in DHR, 23% in IHR). Negative predictive value was 85% (80% in DHR, 95% in IHR). The most frequently positive ST was the intradermal test (7%). Allergy was more frequently confirmed for ofloxacin (OFX) (38%). Positive tests were more frequent for fixed drug eruption (67%). Cross-reactivity was detected in 15%, involving OFX and LFX or CPX and OFX. DPT was responsible for nonsevere recurrence of initial HSR for 13% of patients who had DPT and recurrence leading to a short hospitalization for 2% of them. 3% of contacted patients experienced a nonsevere recurrence of HSR in real life. Conclusion: This cohort demonstrates the benefit and safety of allergological exploration for FQ allowing subsequent use in 73% of cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信