遗存河流搬运的回顾性分析。

IF 1.8
Heather M Garvin, Tessa Punteney, Vanko Gustavo Bicar, Zoe Lambert, Jonathan Thompson
{"title":"遗存河流搬运的回顾性分析。","authors":"Heather M Garvin, Tessa Punteney, Vanko Gustavo Bicar, Zoe Lambert, Jonathan Thompson","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The search for human remains from river systems presents significant challenges due to the complex and variable nature of fluvial environments. Estimating transport distances is critical for defining search areas; yet, no reliable predictive methods exist. Scientific literature on the fluvial transport of human bodies is limited, and the extent of variability in transport outcomes remains poorly documented. This study investigates patterns of body transport in 101 medicolegal cases across Iowa, a state characterized by diverse river systems and seasonal climatic variation, to assess how factors such as postmortem interval (PMI), river discharge rate (volume of water flowing through a river channel), season, clothing, and body mass index (BMI) affect fluvial transport distances. Results show that larger rivers with higher discharge rates are generally associated with longer transport distances and PMIs. River discharge explained approximately 20% of the variation in transport distance, and PMI accounted for 5%. However, substantial variability exists, with some bodies traveling significant distances in short periods (e.g., 1.2 miles in 30 min), even in medium-sized rivers. The longest transport was 89 miles in the Mississippi River. Seasonal timing and clothing had minor effects, with heavily clothed winter entries traveling further with higher PMIs. BMI had no significant correlation with transport outcomes. Understanding the range of possible transport distances can inform search strategies. The potential for long-distance transport advocates for increased inter-jurisdictional coordination in search efforts. These results contribute to the limited forensic literature on riverine body transport and provide insight into search and recovery operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective analysis of decedent fluvial transport.\",\"authors\":\"Heather M Garvin, Tessa Punteney, Vanko Gustavo Bicar, Zoe Lambert, Jonathan Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1556-4029.70152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The search for human remains from river systems presents significant challenges due to the complex and variable nature of fluvial environments. Estimating transport distances is critical for defining search areas; yet, no reliable predictive methods exist. Scientific literature on the fluvial transport of human bodies is limited, and the extent of variability in transport outcomes remains poorly documented. This study investigates patterns of body transport in 101 medicolegal cases across Iowa, a state characterized by diverse river systems and seasonal climatic variation, to assess how factors such as postmortem interval (PMI), river discharge rate (volume of water flowing through a river channel), season, clothing, and body mass index (BMI) affect fluvial transport distances. Results show that larger rivers with higher discharge rates are generally associated with longer transport distances and PMIs. River discharge explained approximately 20% of the variation in transport distance, and PMI accounted for 5%. However, substantial variability exists, with some bodies traveling significant distances in short periods (e.g., 1.2 miles in 30 min), even in medium-sized rivers. The longest transport was 89 miles in the Mississippi River. Seasonal timing and clothing had minor effects, with heavily clothed winter entries traveling further with higher PMIs. BMI had no significant correlation with transport outcomes. Understanding the range of possible transport distances can inform search strategies. The potential for long-distance transport advocates for increased inter-jurisdictional coordination in search efforts. These results contribute to the limited forensic literature on riverine body transport and provide insight into search and recovery operations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于河流环境的复杂性和可变性,从河流系统中寻找人类遗骸提出了重大挑战。估计运输距离对于确定搜索区域至关重要;然而,目前还没有可靠的预测方法。关于人体河流运输的科学文献是有限的,运输结果的可变性程度仍然缺乏文献记录。本研究调查了爱荷华州的101个医学案例的尸体运输模式,以评估诸如死后间隔(PMI)、河流流量(流经河道的水量)、季节、衣服和体重指数(BMI)等因素如何影响河流运输距离。爱荷华州以不同的河流系统和季节性气候变化为特征。结果表明,河流越大、流量越大,其输运距离越长,pmi指数越高。河流流量解释了大约20%的运输距离变化,PMI占5%。然而,存在着实质性的变化,一些物体在短时间内移动了很长的距离(例如,30分钟1.2英里),即使在中等大小的河流中也是如此。最长的运输是在密西西比河上的89英里。季节时间和服装的影响较小,穿着厚重的冬季入境者走得更远,pmi指数也更高。BMI与转运结果无显著相关性。了解可能的传输距离范围可以为搜索策略提供信息。长途运输的潜力提倡在搜索工作中加强司法管辖区之间的协调。这些结果对河流尸体运输的有限法医文献有所贡献,并为搜索和恢复行动提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A retrospective analysis of decedent fluvial transport.

The search for human remains from river systems presents significant challenges due to the complex and variable nature of fluvial environments. Estimating transport distances is critical for defining search areas; yet, no reliable predictive methods exist. Scientific literature on the fluvial transport of human bodies is limited, and the extent of variability in transport outcomes remains poorly documented. This study investigates patterns of body transport in 101 medicolegal cases across Iowa, a state characterized by diverse river systems and seasonal climatic variation, to assess how factors such as postmortem interval (PMI), river discharge rate (volume of water flowing through a river channel), season, clothing, and body mass index (BMI) affect fluvial transport distances. Results show that larger rivers with higher discharge rates are generally associated with longer transport distances and PMIs. River discharge explained approximately 20% of the variation in transport distance, and PMI accounted for 5%. However, substantial variability exists, with some bodies traveling significant distances in short periods (e.g., 1.2 miles in 30 min), even in medium-sized rivers. The longest transport was 89 miles in the Mississippi River. Seasonal timing and clothing had minor effects, with heavily clothed winter entries traveling further with higher PMIs. BMI had no significant correlation with transport outcomes. Understanding the range of possible transport distances can inform search strategies. The potential for long-distance transport advocates for increased inter-jurisdictional coordination in search efforts. These results contribute to the limited forensic literature on riverine body transport and provide insight into search and recovery operations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信