间隔重复提高自评学习信心:一项执业家庭医生的大型随机试验。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ting Wang, Zachary J Morgan, Andrew Bazemore, Warren P Newton, David W Price
{"title":"间隔重复提高自评学习信心:一项执业家庭医生的大型随机试验。","authors":"Ting Wang, Zachary J Morgan, Andrew Bazemore, Warren P Newton, David W Price","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Metacognitive accuracy-the extent to which individuals' perceptions of their knowledge align with actual performance-is critical in clinical decision making. Overconfidence can lead to diagnostic errors, while insufficient confidence may delay decisions or prompt unnecessary testing, increasing health care costs. Although longitudinal knowledge assessments with spaced repetition have been shown to improve learning and knowledge transfer, their impact on metacognition remains underexplored. This study investigates changes in confidence under different spaced repetition strategies in a large cohort of family physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the American Board of Family Medicine's Continuous Knowledge Self-Assessment, a longitudinal assessment administered quarterly. Participants rated their confidence on a 6-point scale after each question. In total, 16,751 physicians who completed assessments at baseline, quarter 6, and quarter 10 were included. Participants were randomized to control or intervention groups receiving repeated or clone questions at various intervals. One-sample t tests assessed confidence changes for questions initially answered incorrectly but subsequently answered correctly. Multivariate regression controls demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confidence increased significantly for repeated questions, with moderate effect sizes in single repetition groups and large effect sizes in two-time repetition groups. Clone questions also showed gains, though smaller in magnitude. After adjusting for clinician demographics, male and younger physicians generally reported higher confidence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Spaced repetition enhances both learning and metacognitive accuracy. Two spaced repetitions yielded larger gains. These findings support incorporation of metacognitive-enhancing strategies into CME to improve clinician self-assessment and potentially reduce diagnostic error.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spaced Repetition Enhances Self-Rated Learning Confidence: A Large Randomized Trial Among Practicing Family Physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Ting Wang, Zachary J Morgan, Andrew Bazemore, Warren P Newton, David W Price\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Metacognitive accuracy-the extent to which individuals' perceptions of their knowledge align with actual performance-is critical in clinical decision making. Overconfidence can lead to diagnostic errors, while insufficient confidence may delay decisions or prompt unnecessary testing, increasing health care costs. Although longitudinal knowledge assessments with spaced repetition have been shown to improve learning and knowledge transfer, their impact on metacognition remains underexplored. This study investigates changes in confidence under different spaced repetition strategies in a large cohort of family physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from the American Board of Family Medicine's Continuous Knowledge Self-Assessment, a longitudinal assessment administered quarterly. Participants rated their confidence on a 6-point scale after each question. In total, 16,751 physicians who completed assessments at baseline, quarter 6, and quarter 10 were included. Participants were randomized to control or intervention groups receiving repeated or clone questions at various intervals. One-sample t tests assessed confidence changes for questions initially answered incorrectly but subsequently answered correctly. Multivariate regression controls demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confidence increased significantly for repeated questions, with moderate effect sizes in single repetition groups and large effect sizes in two-time repetition groups. Clone questions also showed gains, though smaller in magnitude. After adjusting for clinician demographics, male and younger physicians generally reported higher confidence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Spaced repetition enhances both learning and metacognitive accuracy. Two spaced repetitions yielded larger gains. These findings support incorporation of metacognitive-enhancing strategies into CME to improve clinician self-assessment and potentially reduce diagnostic error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000615\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

元认知准确性——个体对其知识的感知与实际表现一致的程度——在临床决策中至关重要。过度自信可能导致诊断错误,而信心不足可能延迟决策或促使进行不必要的检测,从而增加医疗保健成本。尽管使用间隔重复的纵向知识评估已被证明可以改善学习和知识转移,但其对元认知的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究调查了家庭医生在不同间隔重复策略下自信心的变化。方法:数据来自美国家庭医学委员会的连续知识自我评估,这是一项每季进行的纵向评估。在每个问题之后,参与者以6分制对自己的信心进行打分。总共有16,751名医生在基线、第6季度和第10季度完成了评估。参与者被随机分为对照组或干预组,在不同的时间间隔接受重复或克隆的问题。单样本t检验评估了最初回答错误但随后回答正确的问题的置信度变化。多元回归控制人口因素。结果:重复问题的自信心显著增加,单次重复组的效果中等,两次重复组的效果较大。克隆问题也有所增加,尽管幅度较小。在对临床医生的人口统计数据进行调整后,男性和年轻医生普遍报告了更高的信心。讨论:间隔重复提高了学习和元认知的准确性。两次间隔重复可以获得更大的收益。这些发现支持将元认知增强策略纳入CME,以改善临床医生的自我评估,并可能减少诊断错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spaced Repetition Enhances Self-Rated Learning Confidence: A Large Randomized Trial Among Practicing Family Physicians.

Introduction: Metacognitive accuracy-the extent to which individuals' perceptions of their knowledge align with actual performance-is critical in clinical decision making. Overconfidence can lead to diagnostic errors, while insufficient confidence may delay decisions or prompt unnecessary testing, increasing health care costs. Although longitudinal knowledge assessments with spaced repetition have been shown to improve learning and knowledge transfer, their impact on metacognition remains underexplored. This study investigates changes in confidence under different spaced repetition strategies in a large cohort of family physicians.

Methods: Data were drawn from the American Board of Family Medicine's Continuous Knowledge Self-Assessment, a longitudinal assessment administered quarterly. Participants rated their confidence on a 6-point scale after each question. In total, 16,751 physicians who completed assessments at baseline, quarter 6, and quarter 10 were included. Participants were randomized to control or intervention groups receiving repeated or clone questions at various intervals. One-sample t tests assessed confidence changes for questions initially answered incorrectly but subsequently answered correctly. Multivariate regression controls demographic factors.

Results: Confidence increased significantly for repeated questions, with moderate effect sizes in single repetition groups and large effect sizes in two-time repetition groups. Clone questions also showed gains, though smaller in magnitude. After adjusting for clinician demographics, male and younger physicians generally reported higher confidence.

Discussion: Spaced repetition enhances both learning and metacognitive accuracy. Two spaced repetitions yielded larger gains. These findings support incorporation of metacognitive-enhancing strategies into CME to improve clinician self-assessment and potentially reduce diagnostic error.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信