分娩恐惧的诊断分类:为什么特定的恐惧可能还不够。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nichole Fairbrother, Cora Keeney
{"title":"分娩恐惧的诊断分类:为什么特定的恐惧可能还不够。","authors":"Nichole Fairbrother, Cora Keeney","doi":"10.1017/S1352465825000128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fear of childbirth (FoB) is a common experience during pregnancy which can cause clinically significant distress and impairment. To date, a number of investigations of FoB have assumed that clinically significant FoB is best understood as a type of specific phobia. However, preliminary evidence suggests that specific phobia may not be the only diagnostic category under which clinically significant symptoms of FoB are best described.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The current study is the first to investigate which DSM-5 diagnostic categories best describe clinically significant symptoms of FoB.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Pregnant people reporting high levels of FoB (<i>n</i>=18) were administered diagnostic interviews related to their experience of FoB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i>=18) were predominantly nulliparous (73.3%), cisgender women (83.3%). Of these, 14 (77.8%) met criteria for one or more DSM-5 anxiety-related disorders. Preliminary findings suggest that primary FoB may align with specific phobia criteria, whereas secondary FoB (following a traumatic birth) may be better classified under post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). FoB also featured in other anxiety-related disorders but was not the primary focus (e.g. obsessive-compulsive disorder). Four participants did not meet criteria for any DSM-<i>5</i> disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide preliminary evidence that clinically significant FoB fits within existing DSM-5 categories, in particular specific phobia and PTSD. Although FoB-related concerns appears in other anxiety-related disorder categories, it does not appear as the primary focus. Although informative, due to the small sample employed in this research, replication in larger and more diverse samples is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47936,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic classification of fear of childbirth: why specific phobia may not be enough.\",\"authors\":\"Nichole Fairbrother, Cora Keeney\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1352465825000128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fear of childbirth (FoB) is a common experience during pregnancy which can cause clinically significant distress and impairment. To date, a number of investigations of FoB have assumed that clinically significant FoB is best understood as a type of specific phobia. However, preliminary evidence suggests that specific phobia may not be the only diagnostic category under which clinically significant symptoms of FoB are best described.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The current study is the first to investigate which DSM-5 diagnostic categories best describe clinically significant symptoms of FoB.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Pregnant people reporting high levels of FoB (<i>n</i>=18) were administered diagnostic interviews related to their experience of FoB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i>=18) were predominantly nulliparous (73.3%), cisgender women (83.3%). Of these, 14 (77.8%) met criteria for one or more DSM-5 anxiety-related disorders. Preliminary findings suggest that primary FoB may align with specific phobia criteria, whereas secondary FoB (following a traumatic birth) may be better classified under post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). FoB also featured in other anxiety-related disorders but was not the primary focus (e.g. obsessive-compulsive disorder). Four participants did not meet criteria for any DSM-<i>5</i> disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide preliminary evidence that clinically significant FoB fits within existing DSM-5 categories, in particular specific phobia and PTSD. Although FoB-related concerns appears in other anxiety-related disorder categories, it does not appear as the primary focus. Although informative, due to the small sample employed in this research, replication in larger and more diverse samples is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465825000128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465825000128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:分娩恐惧(FoB)是怀孕期间的常见经历,可引起临床显着的痛苦和损害。迄今为止,许多关于FoB的研究都认为临床上重要的FoB最好被理解为一种特定的恐惧症。然而,初步证据表明,特异性恐惧症可能不是唯一的诊断类别,在这种诊断类别下,FoB的临床显著症状可能得到最好的描述。目的:目前的研究是第一个调查哪些DSM-5诊断类别最能描述FoB的临床显著症状。方法:报告高水平FoB的孕妇(n=18)被给予与其FoB经历相关的诊断性访谈。结果:参与者(n=18)主要为未产妇女(73.3%),顺性别妇女(83.3%)。其中,14例(77.8%)符合一种或多种DSM-5焦虑相关障碍的标准。初步研究结果表明,原发性FoB可能符合特定的恐惧症标准,而继发性FoB(在创伤性分娩后)可能更适合归类为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。在其他与焦虑相关的障碍中,FoB也有表现,但不是主要焦点(例如强迫症)。4名参与者不符合任何DSM-5障碍的标准。结论:研究结果提供了初步证据,临床显著的FoB符合现有的DSM-5分类,特别是特定恐惧症和创伤后应激障碍。尽管与焦虑相关的担忧出现在其他焦虑相关的障碍类别中,但它并不是主要关注的焦点。虽然信息丰富,但由于本研究采用的样本较小,需要在更大和更多样化的样本中进行复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic classification of fear of childbirth: why specific phobia may not be enough.

Background: Fear of childbirth (FoB) is a common experience during pregnancy which can cause clinically significant distress and impairment. To date, a number of investigations of FoB have assumed that clinically significant FoB is best understood as a type of specific phobia. However, preliminary evidence suggests that specific phobia may not be the only diagnostic category under which clinically significant symptoms of FoB are best described.

Aim: The current study is the first to investigate which DSM-5 diagnostic categories best describe clinically significant symptoms of FoB.

Method: Pregnant people reporting high levels of FoB (n=18) were administered diagnostic interviews related to their experience of FoB.

Results: Participants (n=18) were predominantly nulliparous (73.3%), cisgender women (83.3%). Of these, 14 (77.8%) met criteria for one or more DSM-5 anxiety-related disorders. Preliminary findings suggest that primary FoB may align with specific phobia criteria, whereas secondary FoB (following a traumatic birth) may be better classified under post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). FoB also featured in other anxiety-related disorders but was not the primary focus (e.g. obsessive-compulsive disorder). Four participants did not meet criteria for any DSM-5 disorder.

Conclusions: Findings provide preliminary evidence that clinically significant FoB fits within existing DSM-5 categories, in particular specific phobia and PTSD. Although FoB-related concerns appears in other anxiety-related disorder categories, it does not appear as the primary focus. Although informative, due to the small sample employed in this research, replication in larger and more diverse samples is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal aimed primarily at members of the helping and teaching professions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy features original research papers, covering both experimental and clinical work, that contribute to the theory, practice and evolution of cognitive and behaviour therapy. The journal aims to reflect and influence the continuing changes in the concepts, methodology, and techniques of behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. A particular feature of the journal is its broad ranging scope - both in terms of topics and types of study covered. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy encompasses most areas of human behaviour and experience, and represents many different research methods, from randomized controlled trials to detailed case studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信