Hayley McKenzie, Greer Lamaro Haintz, Carly Dennis, Melissa Graham
{"title":"生殖决策:生活在澳大利亚维多利亚州的妇女寻求什么样的社会支持,她们是否满意?","authors":"Hayley McKenzie, Greer Lamaro Haintz, Carly Dennis, Melissa Graham","doi":"10.1111/psrh.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This paper describes the social support women aged 25-35 years living in Victoria, Australia draw on during the reproductive decision-making process specific to the type of support they seek and their satisfaction with that support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study that collected data through an online questionnaire administered via Qualtrics. This included both closed- and open-ended questions, exploring women's experiences of receiving social support for reproductive decision-making, the types of support they sought, and their satisfaction with the support received. Using convenience sampling, we recruited 234 women aged 25-35 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The women highlighted a myriad of factors that influenced their experiences of seeking and receiving support (or not), both positively and negatively. These included individual or micro-level factors (e.g., interpersonal relationships); contextual factors (e.g., issue and/or time-dependent); and macro/societal level factors (e.g., social attitudes and norms). The type of support depends on the reproductive decision, with women employing strategies to enhance their satisfaction with support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings are important to inform and advocate for future public health and social policy to support women's decision-making and overall health and wellbeing related to their reproductive autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47632,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproductive Decision-Making: What Type of Social Support do Women Living in Victoria, Australia Seek and Are They Satisfied?\",\"authors\":\"Hayley McKenzie, Greer Lamaro Haintz, Carly Dennis, Melissa Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psrh.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This paper describes the social support women aged 25-35 years living in Victoria, Australia draw on during the reproductive decision-making process specific to the type of support they seek and their satisfaction with that support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study that collected data through an online questionnaire administered via Qualtrics. This included both closed- and open-ended questions, exploring women's experiences of receiving social support for reproductive decision-making, the types of support they sought, and their satisfaction with the support received. Using convenience sampling, we recruited 234 women aged 25-35 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The women highlighted a myriad of factors that influenced their experiences of seeking and receiving support (or not), both positively and negatively. These included individual or micro-level factors (e.g., interpersonal relationships); contextual factors (e.g., issue and/or time-dependent); and macro/societal level factors (e.g., social attitudes and norms). The type of support depends on the reproductive decision, with women employing strategies to enhance their satisfaction with support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings are important to inform and advocate for future public health and social policy to support women's decision-making and overall health and wellbeing related to their reproductive autonomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psrh.70031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psrh.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reproductive Decision-Making: What Type of Social Support do Women Living in Victoria, Australia Seek and Are They Satisfied?
Aim: This paper describes the social support women aged 25-35 years living in Victoria, Australia draw on during the reproductive decision-making process specific to the type of support they seek and their satisfaction with that support.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study that collected data through an online questionnaire administered via Qualtrics. This included both closed- and open-ended questions, exploring women's experiences of receiving social support for reproductive decision-making, the types of support they sought, and their satisfaction with the support received. Using convenience sampling, we recruited 234 women aged 25-35 years.
Results: The women highlighted a myriad of factors that influenced their experiences of seeking and receiving support (or not), both positively and negatively. These included individual or micro-level factors (e.g., interpersonal relationships); contextual factors (e.g., issue and/or time-dependent); and macro/societal level factors (e.g., social attitudes and norms). The type of support depends on the reproductive decision, with women employing strategies to enhance their satisfaction with support.
Conclusion: These findings are important to inform and advocate for future public health and social policy to support women's decision-making and overall health and wellbeing related to their reproductive autonomy.
期刊介绍:
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health provides the latest peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other developed countries. For more than four decades, Perspectives has offered unique insights into how reproductive health issues relate to one another; how they are affected by policies and programs; and their implications for individuals and societies. Published four times a year, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health includes original research, special reports and commentaries on the latest developments in the field of sexual and reproductive health, as well as staff-written summaries of recent findings in the field.