Jessica Beetch, Kapil Khadka, Michael Clark, Kunle Adesigbin, Katrin Kuhn, Aaron Wendelboe
{"title":"2020年3月12日至2022年2月28日,俄克拉何马州俄克拉何马县SARS-CoV-2变异优势期流行病学差异研究","authors":"Jessica Beetch, Kapil Khadka, Michael Clark, Kunle Adesigbin, Katrin Kuhn, Aaron Wendelboe","doi":"10.1177/22799036251363919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>While it is well-known that age and race/ethnicity have been associated with poor COVID-19-related outcomes, it is less clear if vulnerable populations consistently experienced higher rates of poor outcomes over time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Considering this, our study compared COVID-19-related outcomes by age group and racial/ethnic group across variant-dominant periods to assess how poor outcomes were experienced over time in Oklahoma County.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we used health department surveillance data to compare COVID-19-related average daily case, hospitalization, and case fatality rates across three time periods-each dominated by different SARS-CoV-2 variants in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing across variant-dominant time periods, with respect to age, we observed that people age 65+ years consistently had the highest average daily rates of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death. With respect to race/ethnicity, we observed that American Indian/Alaska Natives consistently experienced the highest case rate, that Black people experienced high rates of hospitalization during the pre-Delta- and Delta-dominant time periods, and White people consistently experienced the highest rate of death. Hispanic people experienced the first surge of cases in the pandemic and subsequently had relatively low rates of COVID-19-related outcomes. Asian/Pacific Islanders had relatively low rates of COVID-19-related outcomes except a relatively high rate of death late in the Omicron-dominant period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is little evidence to suggest that once a segment of the population experiences high rates of COVID-19-related outcomes that they will benefit from lower rates of outcomes in subsequent variant-dominant time periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"14 3","pages":"22799036251363919"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining epidemiologic disparity across SARS-CoV-2 variant-dominant periods in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma (March 12, 2020-February 28, 2022).\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Beetch, Kapil Khadka, Michael Clark, Kunle Adesigbin, Katrin Kuhn, Aaron Wendelboe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22799036251363919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>While it is well-known that age and race/ethnicity have been associated with poor COVID-19-related outcomes, it is less clear if vulnerable populations consistently experienced higher rates of poor outcomes over time.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Considering this, our study compared COVID-19-related outcomes by age group and racial/ethnic group across variant-dominant periods to assess how poor outcomes were experienced over time in Oklahoma County.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we used health department surveillance data to compare COVID-19-related average daily case, hospitalization, and case fatality rates across three time periods-each dominated by different SARS-CoV-2 variants in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing across variant-dominant time periods, with respect to age, we observed that people age 65+ years consistently had the highest average daily rates of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death. With respect to race/ethnicity, we observed that American Indian/Alaska Natives consistently experienced the highest case rate, that Black people experienced high rates of hospitalization during the pre-Delta- and Delta-dominant time periods, and White people consistently experienced the highest rate of death. Hispanic people experienced the first surge of cases in the pandemic and subsequently had relatively low rates of COVID-19-related outcomes. Asian/Pacific Islanders had relatively low rates of COVID-19-related outcomes except a relatively high rate of death late in the Omicron-dominant period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is little evidence to suggest that once a segment of the population experiences high rates of COVID-19-related outcomes that they will benefit from lower rates of outcomes in subsequent variant-dominant time periods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"22799036251363919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12340187/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251363919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251363919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining epidemiologic disparity across SARS-CoV-2 variant-dominant periods in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma (March 12, 2020-February 28, 2022).
Context: While it is well-known that age and race/ethnicity have been associated with poor COVID-19-related outcomes, it is less clear if vulnerable populations consistently experienced higher rates of poor outcomes over time.
Objective: Considering this, our study compared COVID-19-related outcomes by age group and racial/ethnic group across variant-dominant periods to assess how poor outcomes were experienced over time in Oklahoma County.
Design and methods: In this retrospective observational study, we used health department surveillance data to compare COVID-19-related average daily case, hospitalization, and case fatality rates across three time periods-each dominated by different SARS-CoV-2 variants in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, US.
Results: When comparing across variant-dominant time periods, with respect to age, we observed that people age 65+ years consistently had the highest average daily rates of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death. With respect to race/ethnicity, we observed that American Indian/Alaska Natives consistently experienced the highest case rate, that Black people experienced high rates of hospitalization during the pre-Delta- and Delta-dominant time periods, and White people consistently experienced the highest rate of death. Hispanic people experienced the first surge of cases in the pandemic and subsequently had relatively low rates of COVID-19-related outcomes. Asian/Pacific Islanders had relatively low rates of COVID-19-related outcomes except a relatively high rate of death late in the Omicron-dominant period.
Conclusion: There is little evidence to suggest that once a segment of the population experiences high rates of COVID-19-related outcomes that they will benefit from lower rates of outcomes in subsequent variant-dominant time periods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.