评价白细胞(WBC)差异计数(比例)不精确性的方法和标准的建议。

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Changhua Peng
{"title":"评价白细胞(WBC)差异计数(比例)不精确性的方法和标准的建议。","authors":"Changhua Peng","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The imprecision coefficient of variation (%CV) of leukocyte (WBC) differential counts (proportion, LDC), the mean proportion of a specific type of white blood cell (%x̅), and the finite number of white blood cells sampled by LDC (n) have a specific functional relationship. The criterion for assessing the imprecision of LDC is based on the %CV, which represents the standard error as a percentage of the mean. This criterion should fall within the prediction interval limits associated with %x̅ and n. An evaluation of the LDC can be based on the functional relationship among these 3 variables. The %CV is calculated from the other 2. Using this functional model, curve fitting is applied to the LDC imprecision data. Hypothesis testing is performed on the parameters of the fitted curve. This aims to identify and exclude entire experimental datasets that, after undergoing the fitting process, do not follow a binomial distribution. An indicator, CVx50E, which is used to evaluate the imprecision of LDC (CVx50E represents the %CV when %x̅ = 50%), is used to compare with the theoretical imprecision indicator of binomial distribution, CVx50B. Subsequently, those experimental datasets that still do not conform to the binomial distribution after the fitting process are excluded. The imprecision of LDC is reassessed using CVx50E. This comprehensive approach to evaluating LDC imprecision is applicable to various instruments and techniques, such as the manual-visual, digital imaging system, and flow-cytometric methods, as well as other measurement procedures where data follow a binomial distribution. This report provides recommendations on how to establish acceptable imprecision criteria for LDC, identify experimental data that do not conform to binomial distribution, and perform imprecision evaluation. The report contains examples of imprecision evaluation of LDC data from the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1333-1346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations for Methods and Criteria for Evaluating the Imprecision of Leukocyte (WBC) Differential Count (Proportional).\",\"authors\":\"Changhua Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jalm/jfaf104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The imprecision coefficient of variation (%CV) of leukocyte (WBC) differential counts (proportion, LDC), the mean proportion of a specific type of white blood cell (%x̅), and the finite number of white blood cells sampled by LDC (n) have a specific functional relationship. The criterion for assessing the imprecision of LDC is based on the %CV, which represents the standard error as a percentage of the mean. This criterion should fall within the prediction interval limits associated with %x̅ and n. An evaluation of the LDC can be based on the functional relationship among these 3 variables. The %CV is calculated from the other 2. Using this functional model, curve fitting is applied to the LDC imprecision data. Hypothesis testing is performed on the parameters of the fitted curve. This aims to identify and exclude entire experimental datasets that, after undergoing the fitting process, do not follow a binomial distribution. An indicator, CVx50E, which is used to evaluate the imprecision of LDC (CVx50E represents the %CV when %x̅ = 50%), is used to compare with the theoretical imprecision indicator of binomial distribution, CVx50B. Subsequently, those experimental datasets that still do not conform to the binomial distribution after the fitting process are excluded. The imprecision of LDC is reassessed using CVx50E. This comprehensive approach to evaluating LDC imprecision is applicable to various instruments and techniques, such as the manual-visual, digital imaging system, and flow-cytometric methods, as well as other measurement procedures where data follow a binomial distribution. This report provides recommendations on how to establish acceptable imprecision criteria for LDC, identify experimental data that do not conform to binomial distribution, and perform imprecision evaluation. The report contains examples of imprecision evaluation of LDC data from the literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1333-1346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

白细胞(WBC)差异计数(比例,LDC)的不精确变异系数(%CV)、特定类型白细胞的平均比例(%x n)和LDC采样的有限白细胞数(n)具有特定的函数关系。评估最不发达国家不精确程度的标准是基于%CV,它代表了标准误差占平均值的百分比。该标准应落在与%x n和n相关的预测区间范围内。最不发达国家的评价可以基于这3个变量之间的函数关系。%CV是根据其他2项计算的。利用该函数模型,对lddc不精确数据进行了曲线拟合。对拟合曲线的参数进行假设检验。其目的是识别和排除经过拟合过程后不遵循二项分布的整个实验数据集。CVx50E是用来评价lddc不精度的指标(CVx50E表示%x = 50%时的%CV),用来与二项分布的理论不精度指标CVx50B进行比较。随后,剔除拟合后仍不符合二项分布的实验数据集。使用CVx50E重新评估LDC的不精度。这种评估最不发达国家不精确程度的综合方法适用于各种仪器和技术,如手动-视觉、数字成像系统和流式细胞术方法,以及数据遵循二项分布的其他测量程序。本报告就如何建立最不发达国家可接受的不精确标准、识别不符合二项分布的实验数据以及进行不精确评估提供了建议。该报告载有对文献中最不发达国家数据进行不精确评价的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommendations for Methods and Criteria for Evaluating the Imprecision of Leukocyte (WBC) Differential Count (Proportional).

The imprecision coefficient of variation (%CV) of leukocyte (WBC) differential counts (proportion, LDC), the mean proportion of a specific type of white blood cell (%x̅), and the finite number of white blood cells sampled by LDC (n) have a specific functional relationship. The criterion for assessing the imprecision of LDC is based on the %CV, which represents the standard error as a percentage of the mean. This criterion should fall within the prediction interval limits associated with %x̅ and n. An evaluation of the LDC can be based on the functional relationship among these 3 variables. The %CV is calculated from the other 2. Using this functional model, curve fitting is applied to the LDC imprecision data. Hypothesis testing is performed on the parameters of the fitted curve. This aims to identify and exclude entire experimental datasets that, after undergoing the fitting process, do not follow a binomial distribution. An indicator, CVx50E, which is used to evaluate the imprecision of LDC (CVx50E represents the %CV when %x̅ = 50%), is used to compare with the theoretical imprecision indicator of binomial distribution, CVx50B. Subsequently, those experimental datasets that still do not conform to the binomial distribution after the fitting process are excluded. The imprecision of LDC is reassessed using CVx50E. This comprehensive approach to evaluating LDC imprecision is applicable to various instruments and techniques, such as the manual-visual, digital imaging system, and flow-cytometric methods, as well as other measurement procedures where data follow a binomial distribution. This report provides recommendations on how to establish acceptable imprecision criteria for LDC, identify experimental data that do not conform to binomial distribution, and perform imprecision evaluation. The report contains examples of imprecision evaluation of LDC data from the literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信