Ioanna Maria Grypari, Iakovos Vlachos, Eleni Stoupi, Despoina Karandrea, Despoina Myoteri, Dina Tiniakos
{"title":"疾病模式和实体在成人肝脏咨询病例突出具有挑战性的领域诊断肝病理实践。","authors":"Ioanna Maria Grypari, Iakovos Vlachos, Eleni Stoupi, Despoina Karandrea, Despoina Myoteri, Dina Tiniakos","doi":"10.1007/s00428-025-04215-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Difficult liver pathology cases often require expert review for optimal patient care. We reviewed consult cases received in our reference centre aiming to highlight challenging areas in hepatopathology that may benefit from specialist consultation and focused educational activities. We included all primary liver consult cases received between 10/2016 and 12/2022. Data on the sender and aetiology for consultation were collected. Initial and consult reports were screened for adequacy of clinical information, stains performed, final diagnosis and disease grading/staging. We retrieved 219 liver consults, 187 submitted by hepatologists. For medical cases, most common initial diagnoses were non-specific changes, chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis without underlying aetiology. Most common consult diagnoses were vascular disease, primary biliary cholangitis and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (p < 0.001). Major change in initial diagnosis was noted in 72 (49%), minor change in 38 (25.9%) and no change in 23 (15.6%) cases. For focal liver lesions (n = 72), most common initial diagnoses were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), non-specific or metastatic. Most common consult diagnoses were HCC, cholangiocarcinoma or non-neoplastic liver (p = 0.033). Major change in initial diagnosis was noted in 30 (41.7%), minor change in 24 (33.3%) and no change in 15 (20.8%) cases. Study of liver consult patterns provides useful information on areas of hepatopathology posing diagnostic difficulty. Most challenging fields are vascular liver disease, interpretation of hepatitic pattern, primary cholangiopathy and classification and subtyping of hepatocellular tumours. These areas can be the subject for future medical educational activities in hepatopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disease patterns and entities in adult liver consult cases highlight challenging areas in diagnostic hepatopathology practice.\",\"authors\":\"Ioanna Maria Grypari, Iakovos Vlachos, Eleni Stoupi, Despoina Karandrea, Despoina Myoteri, Dina Tiniakos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-025-04215-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Difficult liver pathology cases often require expert review for optimal patient care. We reviewed consult cases received in our reference centre aiming to highlight challenging areas in hepatopathology that may benefit from specialist consultation and focused educational activities. We included all primary liver consult cases received between 10/2016 and 12/2022. Data on the sender and aetiology for consultation were collected. Initial and consult reports were screened for adequacy of clinical information, stains performed, final diagnosis and disease grading/staging. We retrieved 219 liver consults, 187 submitted by hepatologists. For medical cases, most common initial diagnoses were non-specific changes, chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis without underlying aetiology. Most common consult diagnoses were vascular disease, primary biliary cholangitis and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (p < 0.001). Major change in initial diagnosis was noted in 72 (49%), minor change in 38 (25.9%) and no change in 23 (15.6%) cases. For focal liver lesions (n = 72), most common initial diagnoses were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), non-specific or metastatic. Most common consult diagnoses were HCC, cholangiocarcinoma or non-neoplastic liver (p = 0.033). Major change in initial diagnosis was noted in 30 (41.7%), minor change in 24 (33.3%) and no change in 15 (20.8%) cases. Study of liver consult patterns provides useful information on areas of hepatopathology posing diagnostic difficulty. Most challenging fields are vascular liver disease, interpretation of hepatitic pattern, primary cholangiopathy and classification and subtyping of hepatocellular tumours. These areas can be the subject for future medical educational activities in hepatopathology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04215-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04215-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disease patterns and entities in adult liver consult cases highlight challenging areas in diagnostic hepatopathology practice.
Difficult liver pathology cases often require expert review for optimal patient care. We reviewed consult cases received in our reference centre aiming to highlight challenging areas in hepatopathology that may benefit from specialist consultation and focused educational activities. We included all primary liver consult cases received between 10/2016 and 12/2022. Data on the sender and aetiology for consultation were collected. Initial and consult reports were screened for adequacy of clinical information, stains performed, final diagnosis and disease grading/staging. We retrieved 219 liver consults, 187 submitted by hepatologists. For medical cases, most common initial diagnoses were non-specific changes, chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis without underlying aetiology. Most common consult diagnoses were vascular disease, primary biliary cholangitis and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (p < 0.001). Major change in initial diagnosis was noted in 72 (49%), minor change in 38 (25.9%) and no change in 23 (15.6%) cases. For focal liver lesions (n = 72), most common initial diagnoses were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), non-specific or metastatic. Most common consult diagnoses were HCC, cholangiocarcinoma or non-neoplastic liver (p = 0.033). Major change in initial diagnosis was noted in 30 (41.7%), minor change in 24 (33.3%) and no change in 15 (20.8%) cases. Study of liver consult patterns provides useful information on areas of hepatopathology posing diagnostic difficulty. Most challenging fields are vascular liver disease, interpretation of hepatitic pattern, primary cholangiopathy and classification and subtyping of hepatocellular tumours. These areas can be the subject for future medical educational activities in hepatopathology.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.