减少肺癌患者放射性肺炎:从中国专家共识到实践。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2025-07-31 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-2025-151
Yaoyao Zhu, Yujie Yan, Jiamei Fu, Qing Shao, Ying Zhang, Xiaoshuai Yuan, Jingjing Kang, Min Hu, Chenxue Jiang, Minren Hu, Ruifeng Zhao, Lan Zhao, Yaping Xu, Shuangyan Yang
{"title":"减少肺癌患者放射性肺炎:从中国专家共识到实践。","authors":"Yaoyao Zhu, Yujie Yan, Jiamei Fu, Qing Shao, Ying Zhang, Xiaoshuai Yuan, Jingjing Kang, Min Hu, Chenxue Jiang, Minren Hu, Ruifeng Zhao, Lan Zhao, Yaping Xu, Shuangyan Yang","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-2025-151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a common but severe complication in lung cancer patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy, significantly impacting patient survival and quality of life. Currently, standardized clinical protocols for predicting, preventing, and managing RP remain insufficiently applied, and the clinical effectiveness of consensus-driven management guidelines in reducing RP remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify whether implementing the Chinese expert consensus on RP could effectively decrease the incidence and severity of RP, and identify independent clinical risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study included 616 lung cancer patients who underwent thoracic radiation therapy at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between August 2020 and January 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on treatment periods relative to the implementation of consensus recommendations in August 2021: the pre-consensus group (treated from August 2020 to July 2021) and the post-consensus group (treated from August to January 2022). The consensus-driven interventions included three key strategies: strict limitation of planning target volume (PTV) margins, individualized lung dose constraints, and standardized steroid treatment protocols. RP incidence and severity were assessed over a 12-month follow-up according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v5.0). Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors for severe RP (SRP, grade ≥3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical characteristics were comparable between the pre- and post-consensus groups. After implementing consensus recommendations, the overall incidence of RP decreased significantly (67.3% <i>vs.</i> 55.2%, P=0.003), and grade ≥3 RP markedly reduced (9.9% <i>vs.</i> 3.4%, P=0.005). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified independent predictors for grade ≥3 RP: pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), lymphocyte baseline counts, limited PTV margin, standardized steroids use, radiotherapy dose and V20.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risk factor prevention and standardized treatment could decrease the occurrence of SRP. Clinicians should implement the recommendations in the RP management consensus in clinical practice. Special attention should be given to patients with identifiable risk factors such as pre-existing ILD, compromised lung function, high radiotherapy dose and low lymphocyte baseline counts, to improve patient prognosis and treatment safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"14 7","pages":"2747-2759"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: from Chinese expert consensus to practice.\",\"authors\":\"Yaoyao Zhu, Yujie Yan, Jiamei Fu, Qing Shao, Ying Zhang, Xiaoshuai Yuan, Jingjing Kang, Min Hu, Chenxue Jiang, Minren Hu, Ruifeng Zhao, Lan Zhao, Yaping Xu, Shuangyan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tlcr-2025-151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a common but severe complication in lung cancer patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy, significantly impacting patient survival and quality of life. Currently, standardized clinical protocols for predicting, preventing, and managing RP remain insufficiently applied, and the clinical effectiveness of consensus-driven management guidelines in reducing RP remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify whether implementing the Chinese expert consensus on RP could effectively decrease the incidence and severity of RP, and identify independent clinical risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study included 616 lung cancer patients who underwent thoracic radiation therapy at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between August 2020 and January 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on treatment periods relative to the implementation of consensus recommendations in August 2021: the pre-consensus group (treated from August 2020 to July 2021) and the post-consensus group (treated from August to January 2022). The consensus-driven interventions included three key strategies: strict limitation of planning target volume (PTV) margins, individualized lung dose constraints, and standardized steroid treatment protocols. RP incidence and severity were assessed over a 12-month follow-up according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v5.0). Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors for severe RP (SRP, grade ≥3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical characteristics were comparable between the pre- and post-consensus groups. After implementing consensus recommendations, the overall incidence of RP decreased significantly (67.3% <i>vs.</i> 55.2%, P=0.003), and grade ≥3 RP markedly reduced (9.9% <i>vs.</i> 3.4%, P=0.005). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified independent predictors for grade ≥3 RP: pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), lymphocyte baseline counts, limited PTV margin, standardized steroids use, radiotherapy dose and V20.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risk factor prevention and standardized treatment could decrease the occurrence of SRP. Clinicians should implement the recommendations in the RP management consensus in clinical practice. Special attention should be given to patients with identifiable risk factors such as pre-existing ILD, compromised lung function, high radiotherapy dose and low lymphocyte baseline counts, to improve patient prognosis and treatment safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"volume\":\"14 7\",\"pages\":\"2747-2759\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337072/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-2025-151\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-2025-151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:放射性肺炎(RP)是肺癌胸部放疗患者常见但严重的并发症,严重影响患者的生存和生活质量。目前,用于预测、预防和管理RP的标准化临床方案仍未得到充分应用,共识驱动的管理指南在减少RP方面的临床有效性仍不清楚。本研究旨在阐明实施中国RP专家共识是否能有效降低RP的发病率和严重程度,并确定独立的临床危险因素。方法:本回顾性比较研究纳入了2020年8月至2022年1月在上海肺科医院接受胸部放射治疗的616例肺癌患者。根据与2021年8月实施共识建议相关的治疗时间将患者分为两组:共识前组(2020年8月至2021年7月治疗)和共识后组(8月至2022年1月治疗)。共识驱动的干预措施包括三个关键策略:严格限制规划目标体积(PTV)边界,个体化肺剂量限制和标准化类固醇治疗方案。根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE, v5.0)评估RP发生率和严重程度,随访12个月。采用多因素logistic回归来确定严重RP (SRP,分级≥3)的预测因素。结果:共识前后两组的临床特征具有可比性。在实施共识建议后,RP的总发生率显著降低(67.3% vs. 55.2%, P=0.003),≥3级RP显著降低(9.9% vs. 3.4%, P=0.005)。多因素logistic回归分析确定了≥3级RP的独立预测因素:先前存在的间质性肺疾病(ILD)、1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、一氧化碳弥散能力(DLCO)、淋巴细胞基线计数、有限PTV边缘、标准化类固醇使用、放疗剂量和V20。结论:危险因素预防和规范化治疗可降低SRP的发生。临床医生应在临床实践中贯彻RP管理共识中的建议。应特别注意具有可识别危险因素的患者,如先前存在ILD、肺功能受损、高放疗剂量和低淋巴细胞基线计数,以改善患者预后和治疗安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: from Chinese expert consensus to practice.

Background: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a common but severe complication in lung cancer patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy, significantly impacting patient survival and quality of life. Currently, standardized clinical protocols for predicting, preventing, and managing RP remain insufficiently applied, and the clinical effectiveness of consensus-driven management guidelines in reducing RP remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify whether implementing the Chinese expert consensus on RP could effectively decrease the incidence and severity of RP, and identify independent clinical risk factors.

Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 616 lung cancer patients who underwent thoracic radiation therapy at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between August 2020 and January 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on treatment periods relative to the implementation of consensus recommendations in August 2021: the pre-consensus group (treated from August 2020 to July 2021) and the post-consensus group (treated from August to January 2022). The consensus-driven interventions included three key strategies: strict limitation of planning target volume (PTV) margins, individualized lung dose constraints, and standardized steroid treatment protocols. RP incidence and severity were assessed over a 12-month follow-up according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v5.0). Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors for severe RP (SRP, grade ≥3).

Results: The clinical characteristics were comparable between the pre- and post-consensus groups. After implementing consensus recommendations, the overall incidence of RP decreased significantly (67.3% vs. 55.2%, P=0.003), and grade ≥3 RP markedly reduced (9.9% vs. 3.4%, P=0.005). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified independent predictors for grade ≥3 RP: pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), lymphocyte baseline counts, limited PTV margin, standardized steroids use, radiotherapy dose and V20.

Conclusions: Risk factor prevention and standardized treatment could decrease the occurrence of SRP. Clinicians should implement the recommendations in the RP management consensus in clinical practice. Special attention should be given to patients with identifiable risk factors such as pre-existing ILD, compromised lung function, high radiotherapy dose and low lymphocyte baseline counts, to improve patient prognosis and treatment safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信