Xing Ji, Zhenpeng Zhu, Chunru Xu, Xiaoyu Li, Jian Lin
{"title":"尿道球囊扩张治疗尿道狭窄的远期预后:来自中国一家三级医疗中心的经验。","authors":"Xing Ji, Zhenpeng Zhu, Chunru Xu, Xiaoyu Li, Jian Lin","doi":"10.21037/tau-2025-223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of urethral stricture, particularly long-segment urethral stricture, poses a significant challenge in urological reconstruction. High-pressure balloon dilation has gained widespread recognition as an effective and safe therapeutic option. However, studies on its long-term outcomes, especially for long-segment urethral stricture, remain scarce. This study aims to establish the clinical baseline efficacy and safety of urethral balloon dilation at a tertiary care center and to provide context through an exploratory comparison with a contemporaneous cohort treated with direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU)/dilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 128 patients with urethral strictures who underwent endoluminal treatment at our center between November 2017 and September 2023. Of these 128 patients, 64 underwent balloon dilation and 64 underwent DVIU/dilation. Demographic and stricture characteristics data were collected. The endpoint was defined as the recurrence of strictures requiring intervention. The efficacy and safety of balloon dilation were analyzed, including outcomes by stricture length within the balloon dilation group. Comparative outcomes with the DVIU/dilation group were explored cautiously due to baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up duration was 26 months for the balloon dilation group and 43 months for the DVIU/dilation group. Patients in the balloon dilation group generally had more complex strictures. The overall 1-year success rate for balloon dilation was 70.1%. Within the balloon dilation group, the 1-year success rate for long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) was 70.0%, and for short-segment strictures (<2 cm) was 70.6%, indicating comparable performance across these lengths in this cohort. The overall incidence of complications in the balloon dilation group was 20.3%. The DVIU/dilation group had an overall 1-year success rate of 70.2%. An exploratory subgroup analysis comparing patients with long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) in both treatment arms showed a success rate for balloon dilation (70.0%) that was markedly superior to that for DVIU/dilation (36.4%) within this specific subgroup (P=0.03, hazard ratio =2.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balloon dilation represents an effective and safe method for the management of both short and long-segment urethral strictures. These findings establish a valuable clinical baseline for conventional balloon dilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 7","pages":"1925-1934"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term prognosis of urethral balloon dilation for urethral strictures: experience from a tertiary care center in China.\",\"authors\":\"Xing Ji, Zhenpeng Zhu, Chunru Xu, Xiaoyu Li, Jian Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-2025-223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of urethral stricture, particularly long-segment urethral stricture, poses a significant challenge in urological reconstruction. High-pressure balloon dilation has gained widespread recognition as an effective and safe therapeutic option. However, studies on its long-term outcomes, especially for long-segment urethral stricture, remain scarce. This study aims to establish the clinical baseline efficacy and safety of urethral balloon dilation at a tertiary care center and to provide context through an exploratory comparison with a contemporaneous cohort treated with direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU)/dilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 128 patients with urethral strictures who underwent endoluminal treatment at our center between November 2017 and September 2023. Of these 128 patients, 64 underwent balloon dilation and 64 underwent DVIU/dilation. Demographic and stricture characteristics data were collected. The endpoint was defined as the recurrence of strictures requiring intervention. The efficacy and safety of balloon dilation were analyzed, including outcomes by stricture length within the balloon dilation group. Comparative outcomes with the DVIU/dilation group were explored cautiously due to baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up duration was 26 months for the balloon dilation group and 43 months for the DVIU/dilation group. Patients in the balloon dilation group generally had more complex strictures. The overall 1-year success rate for balloon dilation was 70.1%. Within the balloon dilation group, the 1-year success rate for long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) was 70.0%, and for short-segment strictures (<2 cm) was 70.6%, indicating comparable performance across these lengths in this cohort. The overall incidence of complications in the balloon dilation group was 20.3%. The DVIU/dilation group had an overall 1-year success rate of 70.2%. An exploratory subgroup analysis comparing patients with long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) in both treatment arms showed a success rate for balloon dilation (70.0%) that was markedly superior to that for DVIU/dilation (36.4%) within this specific subgroup (P=0.03, hazard ratio =2.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balloon dilation represents an effective and safe method for the management of both short and long-segment urethral strictures. These findings establish a valuable clinical baseline for conventional balloon dilation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"14 7\",\"pages\":\"1925-1934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-223\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term prognosis of urethral balloon dilation for urethral strictures: experience from a tertiary care center in China.
Background: The treatment of urethral stricture, particularly long-segment urethral stricture, poses a significant challenge in urological reconstruction. High-pressure balloon dilation has gained widespread recognition as an effective and safe therapeutic option. However, studies on its long-term outcomes, especially for long-segment urethral stricture, remain scarce. This study aims to establish the clinical baseline efficacy and safety of urethral balloon dilation at a tertiary care center and to provide context through an exploratory comparison with a contemporaneous cohort treated with direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU)/dilation.
Methods: There were 128 patients with urethral strictures who underwent endoluminal treatment at our center between November 2017 and September 2023. Of these 128 patients, 64 underwent balloon dilation and 64 underwent DVIU/dilation. Demographic and stricture characteristics data were collected. The endpoint was defined as the recurrence of strictures requiring intervention. The efficacy and safety of balloon dilation were analyzed, including outcomes by stricture length within the balloon dilation group. Comparative outcomes with the DVIU/dilation group were explored cautiously due to baseline differences.
Results: The median follow-up duration was 26 months for the balloon dilation group and 43 months for the DVIU/dilation group. Patients in the balloon dilation group generally had more complex strictures. The overall 1-year success rate for balloon dilation was 70.1%. Within the balloon dilation group, the 1-year success rate for long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) was 70.0%, and for short-segment strictures (<2 cm) was 70.6%, indicating comparable performance across these lengths in this cohort. The overall incidence of complications in the balloon dilation group was 20.3%. The DVIU/dilation group had an overall 1-year success rate of 70.2%. An exploratory subgroup analysis comparing patients with long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) in both treatment arms showed a success rate for balloon dilation (70.0%) that was markedly superior to that for DVIU/dilation (36.4%) within this specific subgroup (P=0.03, hazard ratio =2.48).
Conclusions: Balloon dilation represents an effective and safe method for the management of both short and long-segment urethral strictures. These findings establish a valuable clinical baseline for conventional balloon dilation.
期刊介绍:
ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.