尿道球囊扩张治疗尿道狭窄的远期预后:来自中国一家三级医疗中心的经验。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY
Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2025-07-30 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.21037/tau-2025-223
Xing Ji, Zhenpeng Zhu, Chunru Xu, Xiaoyu Li, Jian Lin
{"title":"尿道球囊扩张治疗尿道狭窄的远期预后:来自中国一家三级医疗中心的经验。","authors":"Xing Ji, Zhenpeng Zhu, Chunru Xu, Xiaoyu Li, Jian Lin","doi":"10.21037/tau-2025-223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of urethral stricture, particularly long-segment urethral stricture, poses a significant challenge in urological reconstruction. High-pressure balloon dilation has gained widespread recognition as an effective and safe therapeutic option. However, studies on its long-term outcomes, especially for long-segment urethral stricture, remain scarce. This study aims to establish the clinical baseline efficacy and safety of urethral balloon dilation at a tertiary care center and to provide context through an exploratory comparison with a contemporaneous cohort treated with direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU)/dilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 128 patients with urethral strictures who underwent endoluminal treatment at our center between November 2017 and September 2023. Of these 128 patients, 64 underwent balloon dilation and 64 underwent DVIU/dilation. Demographic and stricture characteristics data were collected. The endpoint was defined as the recurrence of strictures requiring intervention. The efficacy and safety of balloon dilation were analyzed, including outcomes by stricture length within the balloon dilation group. Comparative outcomes with the DVIU/dilation group were explored cautiously due to baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up duration was 26 months for the balloon dilation group and 43 months for the DVIU/dilation group. Patients in the balloon dilation group generally had more complex strictures. The overall 1-year success rate for balloon dilation was 70.1%. Within the balloon dilation group, the 1-year success rate for long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) was 70.0%, and for short-segment strictures (<2 cm) was 70.6%, indicating comparable performance across these lengths in this cohort. The overall incidence of complications in the balloon dilation group was 20.3%. The DVIU/dilation group had an overall 1-year success rate of 70.2%. An exploratory subgroup analysis comparing patients with long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) in both treatment arms showed a success rate for balloon dilation (70.0%) that was markedly superior to that for DVIU/dilation (36.4%) within this specific subgroup (P=0.03, hazard ratio =2.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balloon dilation represents an effective and safe method for the management of both short and long-segment urethral strictures. These findings establish a valuable clinical baseline for conventional balloon dilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 7","pages":"1925-1934"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term prognosis of urethral balloon dilation for urethral strictures: experience from a tertiary care center in China.\",\"authors\":\"Xing Ji, Zhenpeng Zhu, Chunru Xu, Xiaoyu Li, Jian Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-2025-223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of urethral stricture, particularly long-segment urethral stricture, poses a significant challenge in urological reconstruction. High-pressure balloon dilation has gained widespread recognition as an effective and safe therapeutic option. However, studies on its long-term outcomes, especially for long-segment urethral stricture, remain scarce. This study aims to establish the clinical baseline efficacy and safety of urethral balloon dilation at a tertiary care center and to provide context through an exploratory comparison with a contemporaneous cohort treated with direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU)/dilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were 128 patients with urethral strictures who underwent endoluminal treatment at our center between November 2017 and September 2023. Of these 128 patients, 64 underwent balloon dilation and 64 underwent DVIU/dilation. Demographic and stricture characteristics data were collected. The endpoint was defined as the recurrence of strictures requiring intervention. The efficacy and safety of balloon dilation were analyzed, including outcomes by stricture length within the balloon dilation group. Comparative outcomes with the DVIU/dilation group were explored cautiously due to baseline differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up duration was 26 months for the balloon dilation group and 43 months for the DVIU/dilation group. Patients in the balloon dilation group generally had more complex strictures. The overall 1-year success rate for balloon dilation was 70.1%. Within the balloon dilation group, the 1-year success rate for long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) was 70.0%, and for short-segment strictures (<2 cm) was 70.6%, indicating comparable performance across these lengths in this cohort. The overall incidence of complications in the balloon dilation group was 20.3%. The DVIU/dilation group had an overall 1-year success rate of 70.2%. An exploratory subgroup analysis comparing patients with long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) in both treatment arms showed a success rate for balloon dilation (70.0%) that was markedly superior to that for DVIU/dilation (36.4%) within this specific subgroup (P=0.03, hazard ratio =2.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balloon dilation represents an effective and safe method for the management of both short and long-segment urethral strictures. These findings establish a valuable clinical baseline for conventional balloon dilation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"14 7\",\"pages\":\"1925-1934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-223\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2025-223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尿道狭窄尤其是长段尿道狭窄的治疗是泌尿外科重建术中的一个重大挑战。高压球囊扩张术作为一种安全有效的治疗方法已经得到了广泛的认可。然而,关于其长期效果的研究,特别是对长段尿道狭窄的研究仍然很少。本研究旨在建立三级保健中心尿道球囊扩张的临床基线疗效和安全性,并通过与同期直接视觉内尿道切开术(DVIU)/扩张治疗的探索性比较提供背景。方法:2017年11月至2023年9月在我中心行腔内治疗的尿道狭窄患者128例。在这128例患者中,64例行球囊扩张术,64例行DVIU/扩张术。收集了人口统计学和结构特征数据。终点定义为需要干预的狭窄复发。分析球囊扩张的有效性和安全性,包括球囊扩张组内根据狭窄长度的结果。由于基线差异,与DVIU/扩张组的比较结果被谨慎地探讨。结果:球囊扩张组中位随访时间为26个月,DVIU/扩张组中位随访时间为43个月。球囊扩张组患者通常有更复杂的狭窄。1年球囊扩张的总体成功率为70.1%。在尿道球囊扩张组中,对于长段狭窄(≥2 cm)的1年成功率为70.0%,对于短段狭窄的1年成功率为70.0%。(结论:尿道球囊扩张是治疗短段和长段尿道狭窄的有效和安全的方法。)这些发现为常规球囊扩张建立了有价值的临床基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term prognosis of urethral balloon dilation for urethral strictures: experience from a tertiary care center in China.

Background: The treatment of urethral stricture, particularly long-segment urethral stricture, poses a significant challenge in urological reconstruction. High-pressure balloon dilation has gained widespread recognition as an effective and safe therapeutic option. However, studies on its long-term outcomes, especially for long-segment urethral stricture, remain scarce. This study aims to establish the clinical baseline efficacy and safety of urethral balloon dilation at a tertiary care center and to provide context through an exploratory comparison with a contemporaneous cohort treated with direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU)/dilation.

Methods: There were 128 patients with urethral strictures who underwent endoluminal treatment at our center between November 2017 and September 2023. Of these 128 patients, 64 underwent balloon dilation and 64 underwent DVIU/dilation. Demographic and stricture characteristics data were collected. The endpoint was defined as the recurrence of strictures requiring intervention. The efficacy and safety of balloon dilation were analyzed, including outcomes by stricture length within the balloon dilation group. Comparative outcomes with the DVIU/dilation group were explored cautiously due to baseline differences.

Results: The median follow-up duration was 26 months for the balloon dilation group and 43 months for the DVIU/dilation group. Patients in the balloon dilation group generally had more complex strictures. The overall 1-year success rate for balloon dilation was 70.1%. Within the balloon dilation group, the 1-year success rate for long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) was 70.0%, and for short-segment strictures (<2 cm) was 70.6%, indicating comparable performance across these lengths in this cohort. The overall incidence of complications in the balloon dilation group was 20.3%. The DVIU/dilation group had an overall 1-year success rate of 70.2%. An exploratory subgroup analysis comparing patients with long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) in both treatment arms showed a success rate for balloon dilation (70.0%) that was markedly superior to that for DVIU/dilation (36.4%) within this specific subgroup (P=0.03, hazard ratio =2.48).

Conclusions: Balloon dilation represents an effective and safe method for the management of both short and long-segment urethral strictures. These findings establish a valuable clinical baseline for conventional balloon dilation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信