考虑感知风险的三维避碰运动预测与验证。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Juan Baus, James Yang
{"title":"考虑感知风险的三维避碰运动预测与验证。","authors":"Juan Baus, James Yang","doi":"10.1177/09544119251355037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Predicting human upper extremity motion in three-dimensional (3D) collision avoidance tasks involves integrating biomechanical constraints and cognitive perceived risk into an optimization-based motion prediction framework. The proposed model uses Bayesian Decision Theory to represent human perceived risk stochastically, providing a comprehensive approach to digital human modeling in manual reaching tasks with 3D obstacle collision avoidance. This paper presents an optimization formulation to predict and validate a reaching motion with collision avoidance. First, experimental data was collected in which subjects performed manual reaching tasks involving three distinct 3D obstacles with varying shapes, orientations, and materials. Then, a perceived risk-based 3D collision avoidance model is investigated. Design variables are control points of B-Spline curves representing joint angles for the optimization formulation. The objective function minimizes the joint displacement function and maximizes the end-effector velocity. Constraints include the initial and final postures, joint ranges of motion, upper extremity location related to the experimental setup, and perceived risk-related constraints. The optimization-based framework without perceived risk initially determined the optimal clearance distance, providing a baseline for modeling human motion. This paper modified this baseline through the perceived-risk 3D collision avoidance algorithm to incorporate cognitive factors. Results showed significant improvement in predicting minimum clearance distances when considering perceived risk. For instance, moving around a fragile object caused greater clearance distances, reflecting participants' cautious behavior. The study validated the prediction method by comparing joint angle profiles between experiments and simulations. This work advances digital human modeling by incorporating perceived risk into motion prediction algorithms, moving beyond the traditional reliance on artificial contact spheres. Applications span ergonomics, rehabilitation, and human-robot interaction, offering insights into workspace design, safety, and efficiency. Future research could explore multi-obstacle scenarios, dynamic environments, and alternative loss functions to further refine the model's predictive capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"802-814"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motion prediction and validation considering perceived risk-based three-dimensional collision avoidance.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Baus, James Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09544119251355037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Predicting human upper extremity motion in three-dimensional (3D) collision avoidance tasks involves integrating biomechanical constraints and cognitive perceived risk into an optimization-based motion prediction framework. The proposed model uses Bayesian Decision Theory to represent human perceived risk stochastically, providing a comprehensive approach to digital human modeling in manual reaching tasks with 3D obstacle collision avoidance. This paper presents an optimization formulation to predict and validate a reaching motion with collision avoidance. First, experimental data was collected in which subjects performed manual reaching tasks involving three distinct 3D obstacles with varying shapes, orientations, and materials. Then, a perceived risk-based 3D collision avoidance model is investigated. Design variables are control points of B-Spline curves representing joint angles for the optimization formulation. The objective function minimizes the joint displacement function and maximizes the end-effector velocity. Constraints include the initial and final postures, joint ranges of motion, upper extremity location related to the experimental setup, and perceived risk-related constraints. The optimization-based framework without perceived risk initially determined the optimal clearance distance, providing a baseline for modeling human motion. This paper modified this baseline through the perceived-risk 3D collision avoidance algorithm to incorporate cognitive factors. Results showed significant improvement in predicting minimum clearance distances when considering perceived risk. For instance, moving around a fragile object caused greater clearance distances, reflecting participants' cautious behavior. The study validated the prediction method by comparing joint angle profiles between experiments and simulations. This work advances digital human modeling by incorporating perceived risk into motion prediction algorithms, moving beyond the traditional reliance on artificial contact spheres. Applications span ergonomics, rehabilitation, and human-robot interaction, offering insights into workspace design, safety, and efficiency. Future research could explore multi-obstacle scenarios, dynamic environments, and alternative loss functions to further refine the model's predictive capabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"802-814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119251355037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119251355037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在三维避碰任务中预测人类上肢运动涉及将生物力学约束和认知感知风险整合到基于优化的运动预测框架中。该模型利用贝叶斯决策理论来随机表示人类感知风险,为人工触达任务中具有三维避障的数字人类建模提供了一种全面的方法。本文提出了一种预测和验证避碰到达运动的优化公式。首先,收集实验数据,在实验中,受试者进行手动到达任务,涉及三个不同形状、方向和材料的不同3D障碍物。然后,研究了基于感知风险的三维避碰模型。设计变量是代表关节角的b样条曲线的控制点,用于优化配方。目标函数使关节位移函数最小化,使末端执行器速度最大化。约束条件包括初始和最终姿势、关节活动范围、与实验设置相关的上肢位置以及与感知风险相关的约束条件。无感知风险的优化框架初步确定了最佳间隙距离,为人体运动建模提供了基线。本文通过感知风险三维避碰算法对该基线进行修正,纳入认知因素。结果显示,在考虑感知风险时,预测最小清除距离有显著改善。例如,在易碎物体周围移动会导致更大的清除距离,这反映了参与者的谨慎行为。通过对比实验和仿真结果,验证了预测方法的有效性。这项工作通过将感知风险纳入运动预测算法来推进数字人体建模,超越了传统上对人工接触球体的依赖。应用范围涵盖人体工程学、康复学和人机交互,为工作空间设计、安全性和效率提供见解。未来的研究可以探索多障碍场景、动态环境和替代损失函数,以进一步完善模型的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Motion prediction and validation considering perceived risk-based three-dimensional collision avoidance.

Predicting human upper extremity motion in three-dimensional (3D) collision avoidance tasks involves integrating biomechanical constraints and cognitive perceived risk into an optimization-based motion prediction framework. The proposed model uses Bayesian Decision Theory to represent human perceived risk stochastically, providing a comprehensive approach to digital human modeling in manual reaching tasks with 3D obstacle collision avoidance. This paper presents an optimization formulation to predict and validate a reaching motion with collision avoidance. First, experimental data was collected in which subjects performed manual reaching tasks involving three distinct 3D obstacles with varying shapes, orientations, and materials. Then, a perceived risk-based 3D collision avoidance model is investigated. Design variables are control points of B-Spline curves representing joint angles for the optimization formulation. The objective function minimizes the joint displacement function and maximizes the end-effector velocity. Constraints include the initial and final postures, joint ranges of motion, upper extremity location related to the experimental setup, and perceived risk-related constraints. The optimization-based framework without perceived risk initially determined the optimal clearance distance, providing a baseline for modeling human motion. This paper modified this baseline through the perceived-risk 3D collision avoidance algorithm to incorporate cognitive factors. Results showed significant improvement in predicting minimum clearance distances when considering perceived risk. For instance, moving around a fragile object caused greater clearance distances, reflecting participants' cautious behavior. The study validated the prediction method by comparing joint angle profiles between experiments and simulations. This work advances digital human modeling by incorporating perceived risk into motion prediction algorithms, moving beyond the traditional reliance on artificial contact spheres. Applications span ergonomics, rehabilitation, and human-robot interaction, offering insights into workspace design, safety, and efficiency. Future research could explore multi-obstacle scenarios, dynamic environments, and alternative loss functions to further refine the model's predictive capabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering in Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal encompassing all aspects of engineering in medicine. The Journal is a vital tool for maintaining an understanding of the newest techniques and research in medical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信