慢性肾病患者血液透析的安全性:量表效度和信度的证据。

IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING
Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2025-08-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0327
Leticia Lima Aguiar, Marina Guerra Martins, Renan Alves Silva, Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira, Paulo César de Almeida, Joselany Áfio Caetano
{"title":"慢性肾病患者血液透析的安全性:量表效度和信度的证据。","authors":"Leticia Lima Aguiar, Marina Guerra Martins, Renan Alves Silva, Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira, Paulo César de Almeida, Joselany Áfio Caetano","doi":"10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to analyze evidence of the validity and reliability of the Chronic Kidney Disease Patient Safety Assessment Scale in Hemodialysis Sessions (EASPRCH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a methodological study with an analysis of validity evidence (content and construct) and reliability (temporal stability, internal consistency, and parameterization). A total of 11 judges and 240 patients from three hemodialysis clinics participated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the EASPRCH consists of 15 items distributed across three domains: (1) Strategic Procedures for Error Prevention (6 items), (2) Organizational Processes in Health Management (5 items), and (3) Care Practices for Infection Control (4 items), with scoring available both by domain and overall. The scale has a maximum score of 45 points and a cutoff point (adequate/inadequate) of 34. It achieved a Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 and explained 72.41% of the total variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>the scale provides evidence of weaknesses or strengths related to specific indicators, which may or may not impact patient safety in hemodialysis care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21200,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","volume":"78 3","pages":"e20240327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic kidney disease patient safety in hemodialysis: evidence of scale validity and reliability.\",\"authors\":\"Leticia Lima Aguiar, Marina Guerra Martins, Renan Alves Silva, Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira, Paulo César de Almeida, Joselany Áfio Caetano\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to analyze evidence of the validity and reliability of the Chronic Kidney Disease Patient Safety Assessment Scale in Hemodialysis Sessions (EASPRCH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a methodological study with an analysis of validity evidence (content and construct) and reliability (temporal stability, internal consistency, and parameterization). A total of 11 judges and 240 patients from three hemodialysis clinics participated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the EASPRCH consists of 15 items distributed across three domains: (1) Strategic Procedures for Error Prevention (6 items), (2) Organizational Processes in Health Management (5 items), and (3) Care Practices for Infection Control (4 items), with scoring available both by domain and overall. The scale has a maximum score of 45 points and a cutoff point (adequate/inadequate) of 34. It achieved a Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 and explained 72.41% of the total variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>the scale provides evidence of weaknesses or strengths related to specific indicators, which may or may not impact patient safety in hemodialysis care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem\",\"volume\":\"78 3\",\"pages\":\"e20240327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334197/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析血液透析过程中慢性肾病患者安全评估量表(EASPRCH)的有效性和可靠性。方法:一项方法学研究,分析了有效性证据(内容和结构)和可靠性(时间稳定性、内部一致性和参数化)。共有11名评委和来自3家血液透析诊所的240名患者参与。结果:EASPRCH由15个项目组成,分布在三个领域:(1)错误预防战略程序(6个项目),(2)健康管理组织流程(5个项目)和(3)感染控制护理实践(4个项目),并按领域和总体评分。该量表的最高分为45分,分界点(适当/不适当)为34分。它达到了0.78的Cronbach's alpha,解释了总方差的72.41%。结论:该量表提供了与特定指标相关的弱点或优势的证据,这些指标可能会或可能不会影响血液透析护理中的患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chronic kidney disease patient safety in hemodialysis: evidence of scale validity and reliability.

Objectives: to analyze evidence of the validity and reliability of the Chronic Kidney Disease Patient Safety Assessment Scale in Hemodialysis Sessions (EASPRCH).

Methods: a methodological study with an analysis of validity evidence (content and construct) and reliability (temporal stability, internal consistency, and parameterization). A total of 11 judges and 240 patients from three hemodialysis clinics participated.

Results: the EASPRCH consists of 15 items distributed across three domains: (1) Strategic Procedures for Error Prevention (6 items), (2) Organizational Processes in Health Management (5 items), and (3) Care Practices for Infection Control (4 items), with scoring available both by domain and overall. The scale has a maximum score of 45 points and a cutoff point (adequate/inadequate) of 34. It achieved a Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 and explained 72.41% of the total variance.

Conclusions: the scale provides evidence of weaknesses or strengths related to specific indicators, which may or may not impact patient safety in hemodialysis care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
477
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem created in 1932, March 20 is the official publication of the Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (Brazilian Nursing Association) has as purpose to disseminate the scientific production from different nursing interest areas of knowledge, including those which express the political project of the Association. The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem is the oldest journal of the Brazilian nursing. Its first title was "Annaes de Enfermagem" from 1932 to 1941, being entitled Anais de Enfermagem" until 1955, when its title was changed to the current.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信