{"title":"预测川崎病休克综合征:一种增强诊断的机器学习模型。","authors":"Yifeng Xu, Yuting Pan, Yifan Xie, Lingzhi Qiu, Zhidan Fan, Haiguo Yu","doi":"10.1093/qjmed/hcaf180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kawasaki disease shock syndrome (KDSS), a severe and uncommon phenomenon, lacks effective predictive models for early identification.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to establish a new predictive model for KDSS using machine learning.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 746 children with KD admitted between July 2021 and June 2023 were collected including demographics, laboratory test results before intravenous immunoglobulin, and echocardiography results. Data were divided into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. After feature engineering, predictive models were built using random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix, average accuracy from five-fold cross-validation, while also analyzing misclassified cases. A simple early prediction tool was created based on the optimal model. Prospective data from five KDSS patients admitted between January and June 2024 and that of 15 randomly selected non-shock KD patients were used for external validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CD3+ lymphocyte percentage(CD3+%) had the greatest impact on the model and was an important predictive factor for KDSS, followed by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte(NLR) ratio and Interleukin-6(IL-6). The LightGBM model performed best (AUC, 0.9388; average accuracy, 0.9675; 95% CI, 0.9612, 0.9737). Nine patients were misclassified (4.02%). RF and LR models showed slightly lower performance than the LightGBM model (prospective validation AUC, 0.9000; accuracy, 0.8500).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We constructed an early prediction model for KDSS and performed preliminary validation. This web-based prediction tool may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk pediatric patients to enhance monitoring/treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20806,"journal":{"name":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Shock Syndrome in Kawasaki Disease: A Machine Learning Model for Enhanced Diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Yifeng Xu, Yuting Pan, Yifan Xie, Lingzhi Qiu, Zhidan Fan, Haiguo Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/qjmed/hcaf180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kawasaki disease shock syndrome (KDSS), a severe and uncommon phenomenon, lacks effective predictive models for early identification.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to establish a new predictive model for KDSS using machine learning.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 746 children with KD admitted between July 2021 and June 2023 were collected including demographics, laboratory test results before intravenous immunoglobulin, and echocardiography results. Data were divided into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. After feature engineering, predictive models were built using random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix, average accuracy from five-fold cross-validation, while also analyzing misclassified cases. A simple early prediction tool was created based on the optimal model. Prospective data from five KDSS patients admitted between January and June 2024 and that of 15 randomly selected non-shock KD patients were used for external validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CD3+ lymphocyte percentage(CD3+%) had the greatest impact on the model and was an important predictive factor for KDSS, followed by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte(NLR) ratio and Interleukin-6(IL-6). The LightGBM model performed best (AUC, 0.9388; average accuracy, 0.9675; 95% CI, 0.9612, 0.9737). Nine patients were misclassified (4.02%). RF and LR models showed slightly lower performance than the LightGBM model (prospective validation AUC, 0.9000; accuracy, 0.8500).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We constructed an early prediction model for KDSS and performed preliminary validation. This web-based prediction tool may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk pediatric patients to enhance monitoring/treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf180\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QJM: An International Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaf180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting Shock Syndrome in Kawasaki Disease: A Machine Learning Model for Enhanced Diagnosis.
Background: Kawasaki disease shock syndrome (KDSS), a severe and uncommon phenomenon, lacks effective predictive models for early identification.
Aim: This study aimed to establish a new predictive model for KDSS using machine learning.
Design: Single-center, retrospective analysis.
Methods: Data of 746 children with KD admitted between July 2021 and June 2023 were collected including demographics, laboratory test results before intravenous immunoglobulin, and echocardiography results. Data were divided into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. After feature engineering, predictive models were built using random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), confusion matrix, average accuracy from five-fold cross-validation, while also analyzing misclassified cases. A simple early prediction tool was created based on the optimal model. Prospective data from five KDSS patients admitted between January and June 2024 and that of 15 randomly selected non-shock KD patients were used for external validation.
Results: CD3+ lymphocyte percentage(CD3+%) had the greatest impact on the model and was an important predictive factor for KDSS, followed by neutrophil-to-lymphocyte(NLR) ratio and Interleukin-6(IL-6). The LightGBM model performed best (AUC, 0.9388; average accuracy, 0.9675; 95% CI, 0.9612, 0.9737). Nine patients were misclassified (4.02%). RF and LR models showed slightly lower performance than the LightGBM model (prospective validation AUC, 0.9000; accuracy, 0.8500).
Conclusion: We constructed an early prediction model for KDSS and performed preliminary validation. This web-based prediction tool may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk pediatric patients to enhance monitoring/treatment.
期刊介绍:
QJM, a renowned and reputable general medical journal, has been a prominent source of knowledge in the field of internal medicine. With a steadfast commitment to advancing medical science and practice, it features a selection of rigorously reviewed articles.
Released on a monthly basis, QJM encompasses a wide range of article types. These include original papers that contribute innovative research, editorials that offer expert opinions, and reviews that provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics. The journal also presents commentary papers aimed at initiating discussions on controversial subjects and allocates a dedicated section for reader correspondence.
In summary, QJM's reputable standing stems from its enduring presence in the medical community, consistent publication schedule, and diverse range of content designed to inform and engage readers.